Participatory Research for Person-Centered Care: Involving Undocumented and Recent Migrants

Carol Rivas
{"title":"Participatory Research for Person-Centered Care: Involving Undocumented and Recent Migrants","authors":"Carol Rivas","doi":"10.5750/ijpcm.v13i1.1119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Participatory research is increasingly used to inform person-centered care bottom-up. Nonetheless, researchers often declare it too challenging to include the most underserved groups, a misconception the CICADA study sought to address.\nObjectives: The objectives of this study were to examine a combination of several participatory approaches and research methods that were used to explore COVID-19 pandemic experiences of health and social care among disabled people from minoritized ethnic groups.\nMethods: An intersectional mixed-methods study included secondary data analyses, a three-wave survey and semi-structured qualitative interviews with follow-up workshops. Inclusive assets-based participatory methods were deployed. These incorporated focal community members as co-researchers and participants as co-designers of pragmatic outputs.\nResults: This approach enabled rich data collection from groups often excluded from health research, such as disabled recent and undocumented migrants. Data exemplify the extent, diversity and intersecting nature of various determinants of health and inequities and also successful coping strategies. The community of focus was chosen bottom-up with stakeholders, across the UK, with emphasis on locally relevant contexts and local capacity building, with local embedding of co-researchers. Focusing on community and individual strengths, assets and contexts has transformative potential. Shared power with and engagement of underserved groups was ensured throughout.\nConclusions: Participatory research methods can effectively inform person-centered care, especially for underserved groups. Different participatory procedures are designed for different ends and should be used strategically. A carefully considered approach with community members as co-researchers and partner collaborators is practical, effective and efficient. Co-creation and co-design enhance mutual understandings, with outputs likely to beused in practice for and by underserved groups.","PeriodicalId":89680,"journal":{"name":"International journal of person centered medicine","volume":"172 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of person centered medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5750/ijpcm.v13i1.1119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Participatory research is increasingly used to inform person-centered care bottom-up. Nonetheless, researchers often declare it too challenging to include the most underserved groups, a misconception the CICADA study sought to address. Objectives: The objectives of this study were to examine a combination of several participatory approaches and research methods that were used to explore COVID-19 pandemic experiences of health and social care among disabled people from minoritized ethnic groups. Methods: An intersectional mixed-methods study included secondary data analyses, a three-wave survey and semi-structured qualitative interviews with follow-up workshops. Inclusive assets-based participatory methods were deployed. These incorporated focal community members as co-researchers and participants as co-designers of pragmatic outputs. Results: This approach enabled rich data collection from groups often excluded from health research, such as disabled recent and undocumented migrants. Data exemplify the extent, diversity and intersecting nature of various determinants of health and inequities and also successful coping strategies. The community of focus was chosen bottom-up with stakeholders, across the UK, with emphasis on locally relevant contexts and local capacity building, with local embedding of co-researchers. Focusing on community and individual strengths, assets and contexts has transformative potential. Shared power with and engagement of underserved groups was ensured throughout. Conclusions: Participatory research methods can effectively inform person-centered care, especially for underserved groups. Different participatory procedures are designed for different ends and should be used strategically. A carefully considered approach with community members as co-researchers and partner collaborators is practical, effective and efficient. Co-creation and co-design enhance mutual understandings, with outputs likely to beused in practice for and by underserved groups.
以人为本的护理参与式研究:让无证移民和新移民参与进来
背景:参与式研究越来越多地被用于自下而上地为以人为本的护理提供信息。然而,研究人员经常宣称,要让最缺乏服务的群体参与进来太具有挑战性,而 CICADA 研究正是要解决这一误解:本研究的目的是综合运用几种参与式方法和研究方法,探讨 COVID-19 大流行对少数民族残疾人的健康和社会关怀的影响:一项交叉混合方法研究包括二手数据分析、三波调查、半结构化定性访谈和后续研讨会。采用了以资产为基础的包容性参与方法。这些方法将重点社区成员作为共同研究者,将参与者作为务实成果的共同设计者:结果:这一方法能够从通常被排除在健康研究之外的群体(如残疾的新移民和无证移民)那里收集到丰富的数据。数据体现了健康和不平等的各种决定因素的程度、多样性和交叉性,以及成功的应对策略。重点社区是由英国各地的利益相关者自下而上选择的,强调与当地相关的背景和当地能力建设,并在当地嵌入共同研究者。关注社区和个人的优势、资产和背景具有变革潜力。与得不到充分服务的群体共享权力和他们的参与在整个过程中都得到了保证:参与式研究方法可以有效地为以人为本的护理提供信息,尤其是对服务不足的群体。不同的参与式程序旨在达到不同的目的,应战略性地加以使用。将社区成员作为共同研究者和合作者,这种经过深思熟虑的方法是实用、有效和高效的。共同创造和共同设计可以增进相互理解,其成果有可能在实践中被服务不足群体所使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信