Keabsahan Perkawinan Beda Agama Ada Di Tangan Hakim?

Kharis Mudakir
{"title":"Keabsahan Perkawinan Beda Agama Ada Di Tangan Hakim?","authors":"Kharis Mudakir","doi":"10.47200/awtjhpsa.v2i2.2253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research explores the controversy that still occurs surrounding the Judge's approval in registering marriages between individuals of different religions, even though many religions and laws prohibit interfaith marriages. This research seeks to analyze the factors that are taken into consideration by judges in their decisions, in accordance with relevant laws and regulations in marriage law and the KHI (Compilation of Islamic Law). The research method used is qualitative, especially library research. This approach uses a normative legal approach as an analytical tool which aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of existing problems. The findings of this research highlight the important role of judges in determining the validity of interfaith marriages. Decision Number 508/Pdt.P/2022/PN JKT.SEL was granted, while Decision Number 71/Pdt.P/2017/PN Bla was rejected. The judge's interpretation of Article 2 paragraph (1) of the Marriage Law plays an important role in the validity of interfaith marriages, even though there are quite significant differences with the Compilation of Islamic Law.","PeriodicalId":242964,"journal":{"name":"Asas Wa Tandhim: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan Dan Sosial Keagamaan","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asas Wa Tandhim: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan Dan Sosial Keagamaan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47200/awtjhpsa.v2i2.2253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research explores the controversy that still occurs surrounding the Judge's approval in registering marriages between individuals of different religions, even though many religions and laws prohibit interfaith marriages. This research seeks to analyze the factors that are taken into consideration by judges in their decisions, in accordance with relevant laws and regulations in marriage law and the KHI (Compilation of Islamic Law). The research method used is qualitative, especially library research. This approach uses a normative legal approach as an analytical tool which aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of existing problems. The findings of this research highlight the important role of judges in determining the validity of interfaith marriages. Decision Number 508/Pdt.P/2022/PN JKT.SEL was granted, while Decision Number 71/Pdt.P/2017/PN Bla was rejected. The judge's interpretation of Article 2 paragraph (1) of the Marriage Law plays an important role in the validity of interfaith marriages, even though there are quite significant differences with the Compilation of Islamic Law.
不同信仰间婚姻的有效性掌握在法官手中吗?
尽管许多宗教和法律都禁止不同宗教间的婚姻,但本研究探讨了法官在批准不同宗教间的婚姻登记时仍然存在的争议。本研究试图根据婚姻法和《伊斯兰教法汇编》(KHI)中的相关法律法规,分析法官在做出裁决时所考虑的因素。采用的研究方法是定性研究,尤其是图书馆研究。这种方法采用规范性法律方法作为分析工具,旨在全面了解现存问题。研究结果突出了法官在确定不同信仰间婚姻有效性方面的重要作用。第 508/Pdt.P/2022/PN JKT.SEL 号裁决被批准,而第 71/Pdt.P/2017/PN Bla 号裁决被驳回。法官对《婚姻法》第2条第(1)款的解释在不同信仰间婚姻的有效性方面发挥了重要作用,尽管这与《伊斯兰法律汇编》存在相当大的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信