Breaking The Promise to Marry Unlawful Acts or Default

Justisi Pub Date : 2024-02-10 DOI:10.33506/js.v10i2.2481
Auliah Ambarwati, Muh. Fadli Faisal Rasyid, S. Saharuddin, Devi Dwi Wulandari, M. Syahril
{"title":"Breaking The Promise to Marry Unlawful Acts or Default","authors":"Auliah Ambarwati, Muh. Fadli Faisal Rasyid, S. Saharuddin, Devi Dwi Wulandari, M. Syahril","doi":"10.33506/js.v10i2.2481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to find civil law arrangements regarding the juridical analysis of breaking a promise to marry or what is commonly referred to as Broken Marriage Promises as an unlawful act. What are the legal consequences of breaking a marriage promise as unlawful? This study uses a normative legal research type with a statutory approach. The types and sources of legal materials use primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. Analysis of legal materials uses deductive logical reasoning, which is studied from a qualitative perspective. The results of the study show that breaking a promise to marry or commonly called promises of marriage as an unlawful act, is regulated in Article 58 of the Civil Code and several judges' decisions such as Supreme Court Decision Number 3191 K/Pdt/1984, Supreme Court Decision Number 3277 K/Pdt/2000, Decision of the Supreme Court Number 1644 K/Pdt/2020. The legal consequences of breaking a marriage promise as an unlawful act, namely if a person suffers a loss due to breaking of the marriage promise, both material and immaterial losses, then he can be sued for compensation following the loss suffered if the element of the unlawful act is fulfilled according to Article 1365 of the Civil Code.\nKeywords: Marriage promise; Unlawful act; Default.","PeriodicalId":477047,"journal":{"name":"Justisi","volume":"62 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Justisi","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v10i2.2481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to find civil law arrangements regarding the juridical analysis of breaking a promise to marry or what is commonly referred to as Broken Marriage Promises as an unlawful act. What are the legal consequences of breaking a marriage promise as unlawful? This study uses a normative legal research type with a statutory approach. The types and sources of legal materials use primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. Analysis of legal materials uses deductive logical reasoning, which is studied from a qualitative perspective. The results of the study show that breaking a promise to marry or commonly called promises of marriage as an unlawful act, is regulated in Article 58 of the Civil Code and several judges' decisions such as Supreme Court Decision Number 3191 K/Pdt/1984, Supreme Court Decision Number 3277 K/Pdt/2000, Decision of the Supreme Court Number 1644 K/Pdt/2020. The legal consequences of breaking a marriage promise as an unlawful act, namely if a person suffers a loss due to breaking of the marriage promise, both material and immaterial losses, then he can be sued for compensation following the loss suffered if the element of the unlawful act is fulfilled according to Article 1365 of the Civil Code. Keywords: Marriage promise; Unlawful act; Default.
违背婚姻承诺的非法行为或违约行为
本研究旨在寻找有关违背婚姻承诺或通常所说的违背婚姻承诺为非法行为的司法分析的民法安排。违背婚姻承诺作为违法行为的法律后果是什么?本研究采用的是规范性法律研究类型和法定方法。法律材料的类型和来源采用第一手、第二手和第三手法律材料。法律材料分析采用演绎逻辑推理,从定性角度进行研究。研究结果表明,《民法典》第 58 条和最高法院第 3191 K/Pdt/1984 号判决、最高法院第 3277 K/Pdt/2000 号判决、最高法院第 1644 K/Pdt/2020 号判决等多项法官判决都规定了违背结婚承诺或通常所说的婚姻承诺为违法行为。违反婚姻承诺作为非法行为的法律后果,即如果某人因违反婚姻承诺而遭受损失,包括物质损失和非物质损失,那么根据《民法典》第 1365 条,如果符合非法行为的要件,他可以在遭受损失后起诉要求赔偿:婚姻承诺;非法行为;违约。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信