Evaluation of zootechnical performance of pigs associated with diets based on microencapsulated probiotics with and without growth promoting antibiotics

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
J.M. Agudelo Rendón, C.M. Bedoya Ortiz, J.E. Vasquez, J.M. Uran Velásquez, A.J. Acevedo Montoya, L.C. Veloza Angulo, J.C. Pareja Arcila, O.A. Sáenz Ruíz, R. R. García, J.F. Naranjo Ramírez
{"title":"Evaluation of zootechnical performance of pigs associated with diets based on microencapsulated probiotics with and without growth promoting antibiotics","authors":"J.M. Agudelo Rendón, C.M. Bedoya Ortiz, J.E. Vasquez, J.M. Uran Velásquez, A.J. Acevedo Montoya, L.C. Veloza Angulo, J.C. Pareja Arcila, O.A. Sáenz Ruíz, R. R. García, J.F. Naranjo Ramírez","doi":"10.1163/2049257x-20230005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nFeed efficiency is a crucial parameter in pig production due to its economic and environmental impact. This trial evaluated feed efficiency in pre-fattening pigs subjected to two diets. Diet 1 (D1) was a commercial pelleted feed supplemented with growth-promoting antibiotics and microencapsulated probiotics (Fortcell FeedTM). Diet 2 (D2) was a commercial pelleted feed supplemented with the microencapsulated probiotics. A total of 280 piglets were randomly assigned into two groups with different diets, using four replicated pens per treatment, with five pigs per pen. Seven independent trials (replications) were done. Each replication lasted for 49 days with two phases, 1 (day 1 to 21) and 2 (day 22 to 49). Pigs were individually weighed at the end of each phase. Food consumption and rejection were recorded weekly to determine weight gain, feed conversion and average feed intake per pen. There was no difference in body weight between pigs fed with the two diets during phases 1 and 2. The average daily gain in phase 1 was 11% lower in animals that received D2 (0.27 kg for D1 vs 0.24 kg for D2; P<0.05). The consumption in phase 2 and overall consumption was higher in pigs fed D1 (P<0.05). Overall feed conversion ratio was not statistically different, but was numerically 9.5% lower in animals that received D2 in Phase 2 (1.43 kg for D1 vs 1.35 kg for D2). It was concluded that supplementation with microencapsulated probiotics provides a suitable option to replace antibiotics in pig production.","PeriodicalId":36124,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Animal Nutrition","volume":"79 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Animal Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/2049257x-20230005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Feed efficiency is a crucial parameter in pig production due to its economic and environmental impact. This trial evaluated feed efficiency in pre-fattening pigs subjected to two diets. Diet 1 (D1) was a commercial pelleted feed supplemented with growth-promoting antibiotics and microencapsulated probiotics (Fortcell FeedTM). Diet 2 (D2) was a commercial pelleted feed supplemented with the microencapsulated probiotics. A total of 280 piglets were randomly assigned into two groups with different diets, using four replicated pens per treatment, with five pigs per pen. Seven independent trials (replications) were done. Each replication lasted for 49 days with two phases, 1 (day 1 to 21) and 2 (day 22 to 49). Pigs were individually weighed at the end of each phase. Food consumption and rejection were recorded weekly to determine weight gain, feed conversion and average feed intake per pen. There was no difference in body weight between pigs fed with the two diets during phases 1 and 2. The average daily gain in phase 1 was 11% lower in animals that received D2 (0.27 kg for D1 vs 0.24 kg for D2; P<0.05). The consumption in phase 2 and overall consumption was higher in pigs fed D1 (P<0.05). Overall feed conversion ratio was not statistically different, but was numerically 9.5% lower in animals that received D2 in Phase 2 (1.43 kg for D1 vs 1.35 kg for D2). It was concluded that supplementation with microencapsulated probiotics provides a suitable option to replace antibiotics in pig production.
对添加或不添加促生长抗生素、以微胶囊益生菌为基础的日粮的猪的动物技术性能进行评估
由于对经济和环境的影响,饲料效率是养猪生产中的一个重要参数。本试验对使用两种日粮的育肥猪的饲料效率进行了评估。日粮 1(D1)是一种商用颗粒饲料,添加了促进生长的抗生素和微囊益生菌(Fortcell FeedTM)。日粮 2(D2)是添加了微胶囊益生菌的商品颗粒饲料。总共 280 头仔猪被随机分配到两组,每组使用不同的日粮,每个处理使用 4 个重复的猪栏,每个猪栏 5 头猪。共进行了七次独立试验(重复)。每个重复持续 49 天,分为两个阶段:第 1 阶段(第 1 天至第 21 天)和第 2 阶段(第 22 天至第 49 天)。每个阶段结束时分别称重。每周记录猪的采食量和拒食情况,以确定每栏猪的增重、饲料转化率和平均采食量。在第 1 和第 2 阶段,使用两种日粮喂养的猪的体重没有差异。使用 D2 的动物在第一阶段的平均日增重比使用 D1 的动物低 11%(D1 为 0.27 千克,D2 为 0.24 千克;P<0.05)。饲喂 D1 的猪在第二阶段的消耗量和总消耗量更高(P<0.05)。总体饲料转化率没有统计学差异,但第二阶段饲喂 D2 的动物饲料转化率低 9.5%(D1 为 1.43 千克,D2 为 1.35 千克)。结论是,在养猪生产中补充微胶囊益生菌是替代抗生素的合适选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Animal Nutrition
Journal of Applied Animal Nutrition Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信