Comparison of Physicians’ Perceptions Regarding Dermatological Diseases

Hasan Aksoy, M. Aslan Kayıran
{"title":"Comparison of Physicians’ Perceptions Regarding Dermatological Diseases","authors":"Hasan Aksoy, M. Aslan Kayıran","doi":"10.54005/geneltip.1359912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/Aims: Physicians frequently encounter skin diseases and provide opinions to their patients regarding dermatology. We aimed to assess the perceptions of physicians regarding skin diseases and to compare dermatologists’ and non-dermatologist physicians’ understanding of specific dermatological issues. \nMethods: Through an online form, participants were asked to respond to sentences indicating whether skin diseases are related to the liver or food with options such as \"almost always,\" \"mostly,\" \"half-and-half,\" \"less often,\" and \"almost never.\" Similarly, they were asked to respond to sentences related to avoiding isotretinoin treatment and performing allergy tests in acute urticaria with options as \"strongly disagree,\" \"disagree,\" \"partly agree,\" \"agree,\" and \"strongly agree.\" Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences v.27. \nResults: The sentences “skin diseases are of liver origin” and “skin diseases are caused by foods/drinks” received responses of “almost never” or “less often” at a rate of 91.8% and 80.9%, respectively. The total proportions of participants who selected “strongly agree,” “agree,” or “partly agree” were 53.9% for the statement restricting isotretinoin use and 45.5% for the statement recommending allergy testing in acute urticaria. While 91.8% of dermatologists disagreed with the statement limiting isotretinoin use, 68.3% of non-dermatologist physicians partially or completely agreed. For the statement recommending allergy testing in acute urticaria, 85.8% of dermatologists disagreed, while 55.7% of non-dermatologist physicians partially or completely agreed. \nConclusions: The popular belief that skin diseases are caused by the liver or food has no basis among physicians. However, contrary to the literature, non-dermatologist physicians have expressed opinions that isotretinoin should be used as little as possible due to potential harm to the liver and that allergy tests should be performed in cases of acute urticaria. Giving importance to these topics during medical education will contribute to changing physicians' perspectives and ultimately benefit public health.","PeriodicalId":504618,"journal":{"name":"Genel Tıp Dergisi","volume":"430 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genel Tıp Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54005/geneltip.1359912","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Aims: Physicians frequently encounter skin diseases and provide opinions to their patients regarding dermatology. We aimed to assess the perceptions of physicians regarding skin diseases and to compare dermatologists’ and non-dermatologist physicians’ understanding of specific dermatological issues. Methods: Through an online form, participants were asked to respond to sentences indicating whether skin diseases are related to the liver or food with options such as "almost always," "mostly," "half-and-half," "less often," and "almost never." Similarly, they were asked to respond to sentences related to avoiding isotretinoin treatment and performing allergy tests in acute urticaria with options as "strongly disagree," "disagree," "partly agree," "agree," and "strongly agree." Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences v.27. Results: The sentences “skin diseases are of liver origin” and “skin diseases are caused by foods/drinks” received responses of “almost never” or “less often” at a rate of 91.8% and 80.9%, respectively. The total proportions of participants who selected “strongly agree,” “agree,” or “partly agree” were 53.9% for the statement restricting isotretinoin use and 45.5% for the statement recommending allergy testing in acute urticaria. While 91.8% of dermatologists disagreed with the statement limiting isotretinoin use, 68.3% of non-dermatologist physicians partially or completely agreed. For the statement recommending allergy testing in acute urticaria, 85.8% of dermatologists disagreed, while 55.7% of non-dermatologist physicians partially or completely agreed. Conclusions: The popular belief that skin diseases are caused by the liver or food has no basis among physicians. However, contrary to the literature, non-dermatologist physicians have expressed opinions that isotretinoin should be used as little as possible due to potential harm to the liver and that allergy tests should be performed in cases of acute urticaria. Giving importance to these topics during medical education will contribute to changing physicians' perspectives and ultimately benefit public health.
医生对皮肤病认识的比较
背景/目的:医生经常会遇到皮肤病,并向病人提供有关皮肤病的意见。我们旨在评估医生对皮肤病的看法,并比较皮肤科医生和非皮肤科医生对特定皮肤病问题的理解。调查方法通过在线表格,要求参与者回答皮肤病是否与肝脏或食物有关的句子,选项包括 "几乎总是"、"大部分"、"一半一半"、"较少 "和 "几乎从不"。同样,他们还被要求回答与避免异维A酸治疗和对急性荨麻疹进行过敏测试有关的句子,选项包括 "非常不同意"、"不同意"、"部分同意"、"同意 "和 "非常同意"。统计分析使用社会科学统计软件包 v.27 进行。结果对 "皮肤病是由肝脏引起的 "和 "皮肤病是由食物/饮料引起的 "这两句话的回答为 "几乎从不 "或 "较少 "的比例分别为 91.8%和 80.9%。对于限制使用异维A酸的说法,选择 "非常同意"、"同意 "或 "部分同意 "的参与者比例分别为 53.9%;对于建议急性荨麻疹患者进行过敏测试的说法,选择 "非常同意"、"同意 "或 "部分同意 "的参与者比例分别为 45.5%。91.8%的皮肤科医生不同意限制异维A酸使用的声明,68.3%的非皮肤科医生部分或完全同意。对于建议在急性荨麻疹时进行过敏测试的说法,85.8% 的皮肤科医生不同意,而 55.7% 的非皮肤科医生部分或完全同意。结论:人们普遍认为皮肤病是由肝脏或食物引起的,这种观点在医生中毫无根据。然而,与文献报道相反的是,非皮肤科医生表示,由于异维A酸可能对肝脏造成伤害,因此应尽量少用异维A酸,而且在急性荨麻疹病例中应进行过敏测试。在医学教育中重视这些话题将有助于改变医生的观点,最终有利于公众健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信