Sedentary Behavior and Risk of Depression in Older Adults: A Systematic Meta-Analysis

Qiusha Li, Zixuan Zhao, Chunxiao Yang, Zhongming Chen, Wenqiang Yin
{"title":"Sedentary Behavior and Risk of Depression in Older Adults: A Systematic Meta-Analysis","authors":"Qiusha Li, Zixuan Zhao, Chunxiao Yang, Zhongming Chen, Wenqiang Yin","doi":"10.18502/ijph.v53i2.14914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The elderly represents the population group with the highest rate of sedentary behavior. Sedentary behavior has an adverse impact on the elderly, which might be related to depression. \nMethods: We queried PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and MEDLINE to collect literature data. The odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were adopted for the pooled measurements. Sub-group analyses were conducted through stratified meta-analyses based on study design, depression indicator, adjustment for physical activity, sedentary behavior indicator, and type. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the results, and publication bias was assessed through a funnel plot. \nResults: Seven cross-sectional studies and five cohort studies were included in our meta-analysis. The overall pooled OR was 1.38 (95%CI: 1.16–1.65; P < 0.01), which indicated that sedentary behavior was positively associated with depression in older adults. Sub-group analysis showed that different study designs, depression indicators, sedentary behavior indicators, adjustment for physical activity, sedentary behavior indicator, and type produced different results. In the cross-sectional studies (OR = 1.45, 95%CI: 1.15–1.84), CES-D scale (OR = 1.54, 95%CI: 1.13–2.10), self-reported (OR = 1.39, 95%CI: 1.04–1.87), watching TV (OR = 1.75, 95%CI: 1.02–3.02), and not adjusted for physical activity (OR = 1.37, 95%CI: 1.14–1.65) groups, there was a strong correlation between sedentary behavior and depression in the elderly. \nConclusion: Sedentary behavior is associated with depression in the elderly. As a preventive strategy, we should consider reducing their sedentary time and appropriately increasing physical activity. \n ","PeriodicalId":510223,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Public Health","volume":"137 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v53i2.14914","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The elderly represents the population group with the highest rate of sedentary behavior. Sedentary behavior has an adverse impact on the elderly, which might be related to depression. Methods: We queried PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and MEDLINE to collect literature data. The odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were adopted for the pooled measurements. Sub-group analyses were conducted through stratified meta-analyses based on study design, depression indicator, adjustment for physical activity, sedentary behavior indicator, and type. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the results, and publication bias was assessed through a funnel plot. Results: Seven cross-sectional studies and five cohort studies were included in our meta-analysis. The overall pooled OR was 1.38 (95%CI: 1.16–1.65; P < 0.01), which indicated that sedentary behavior was positively associated with depression in older adults. Sub-group analysis showed that different study designs, depression indicators, sedentary behavior indicators, adjustment for physical activity, sedentary behavior indicator, and type produced different results. In the cross-sectional studies (OR = 1.45, 95%CI: 1.15–1.84), CES-D scale (OR = 1.54, 95%CI: 1.13–2.10), self-reported (OR = 1.39, 95%CI: 1.04–1.87), watching TV (OR = 1.75, 95%CI: 1.02–3.02), and not adjusted for physical activity (OR = 1.37, 95%CI: 1.14–1.65) groups, there was a strong correlation between sedentary behavior and depression in the elderly. Conclusion: Sedentary behavior is associated with depression in the elderly. As a preventive strategy, we should consider reducing their sedentary time and appropriately increasing physical activity.  
久坐行为与老年人抑郁风险:系统性元分析
背景老年人是久坐行为发生率最高的人群。久坐不动对老年人有不利影响,可能与抑郁症有关。研究方法我们查询了 PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science 和 MEDLINE,以收集文献数据。在汇总测量中采用了几率比(OR)和相应的 95% 置信区间(CI)。根据研究设计、抑郁指标、体力活动调整、久坐行为指标和类型,通过分层荟萃分析进行亚组分析。进行了敏感性分析以检验结果的稳健性,并通过漏斗图评估了发表偏倚。研究结果我们的荟萃分析纳入了七项横断面研究和五项队列研究。总体汇总 OR 为 1.38(95%CI:1.16-1.65;P < 0.01),表明久坐行为与老年人抑郁呈正相关。亚组分析表明,不同的研究设计、抑郁指标、久坐行为指标、体力活动调整、久坐行为指标和类型会产生不同的结果。在横断面研究组(OR = 1.45,95%CI:1.15-1.84)、CES-D 量表组(OR = 1.54,95%CI:1.13-2.10)、自我报告组(OR = 1.39,95%CI:1.04-1.87)、看电视组(OR = 1.75,95%CI:1.02-3.02)和未调整体力活动组(OR = 1.37,95%CI:1.14-1.65)中,老年人的久坐行为与抑郁症之间存在很强的相关性。结论久坐不动与老年人抑郁有关。作为预防策略,我们应考虑减少老年人的久坐时间,并适当增加体育锻炼。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信