Multiple Dimensions of Machismo: Linguistic Considerations for Latino Sexual Minority Men in the United States

Gabriel Robles, Trey V. Dellucci, Javier Garcia-Perez, Tyrel J. Starks
{"title":"Multiple Dimensions of Machismo: Linguistic Considerations for Latino Sexual Minority Men in the United States","authors":"Gabriel Robles, Trey V. Dellucci, Javier Garcia-Perez, Tyrel J. Starks","doi":"10.1177/10608265241234361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The literature differentiates between two domains of machismo: traditional machismo and caballerismo. Research has largely focused on measuring machismo among English speakers. We evaluated whether Estrada’s (2011) 2-factor model of machismo was invariant across language (English vs. a direct Spanish translation). A series of multigroup confirmatory factor analyses were conducted between respondents who completed the survey in English ( n = 428) and Spanish ( n = 102). Analyses suggested the hypothesized 2-factor model did not fit across language groups. While the traditional 2-factor structure emerged in the English language data, exploratory factor analysis indicated a 3-factor structure of machismo among Spanish-speaking respondents. One of the new factors (inherent machismo), among Spanish-speaking respondents, was associated with internalized heterosexism, suggesting that the new factor structure may capture the belief that masculine men are superior. These findings suggest there is a need for the development of culturally appropriate Spanish language assessment.","PeriodicalId":510060,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Men’s Studies","volume":"26 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Men’s Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10608265241234361","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The literature differentiates between two domains of machismo: traditional machismo and caballerismo. Research has largely focused on measuring machismo among English speakers. We evaluated whether Estrada’s (2011) 2-factor model of machismo was invariant across language (English vs. a direct Spanish translation). A series of multigroup confirmatory factor analyses were conducted between respondents who completed the survey in English ( n = 428) and Spanish ( n = 102). Analyses suggested the hypothesized 2-factor model did not fit across language groups. While the traditional 2-factor structure emerged in the English language data, exploratory factor analysis indicated a 3-factor structure of machismo among Spanish-speaking respondents. One of the new factors (inherent machismo), among Spanish-speaking respondents, was associated with internalized heterosexism, suggesting that the new factor structure may capture the belief that masculine men are superior. These findings suggest there is a need for the development of culturally appropriate Spanish language assessment.
大男子主义的多重维度:美国拉丁裔性少数群体男性的语言考量
文献将大男子主义区分为两个领域:传统大男子主义和男性大男子主义。研究主要集中于测量英语使用者的大男子主义。我们评估了 Estrada(2011 年)的大男子主义双因素模型是否具有跨语言(英语与西班牙语直译)的不变性。我们对用英语(n = 428)和西班牙语(n = 102)完成调查的受访者进行了一系列多组确认性因素分析。分析表明,假设的 2 因子模型并不适合不同语言组。虽然英语数据中出现了传统的 2 因子结构,但探索性因子分析表明,西班牙语受访者的大男子主义结构为 3 因子结构。在西班牙语受访者中,其中一个新因子(固有的大男子主义)与内化的异性恋相关,这表明新的因子结构可能捕捉到了男性优越的信念。这些研究结果表明,有必要开发与文化相适应的西班牙语评估工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信