Prevalence and predictors of hypercoagulability detected by rotational thromboelastometry in peritoneal malignancy patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery

Elizabeth Skalkos, Mina Sarofim, Stephany Game, Ruwanthi Wijayawardana, Nima Ahmadi, David L Morris
{"title":"Prevalence and predictors of hypercoagulability detected by rotational thromboelastometry in peritoneal malignancy patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery","authors":"Elizabeth Skalkos, Mina Sarofim, Stephany Game, Ruwanthi Wijayawardana, Nima Ahmadi, David L Morris","doi":"10.18203/2349-2902.isj20240333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is an established treatment for peritoneal malignancy. A hypercoagulable state in these patients and the associated risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), remains the most common cause of 30-day mortality. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and perioperative factors associated with baseline hypercoagulability detected by rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM), a point-of-care haemostatic assay, in peritoneal malignancy patients.\nMethods: A retrospective cohort study was performed in a peritoneal malignancy unit on patients undergoing CRS between 2019 and 2023, who underwent preoperative ROTEM testing. Patients were divided into group A (hypercoagulable) and Group B (normal coagulation). Baseline characteristics, pathology results, operative details and post operative outcomes were reviewed. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to identify factors associated with baseline hypercoagulability.\nResults: The 70 patients were included, 23 patients in group A (32.9%) and 47 patients in group B (67.1%). Group A had a lower preoperative haemoglobin (p<0.001), higher platelet count (p<0.001) and median peritoneal carcinomatosis index (33 vs 10, p=0.003). Appendiceal primary was associated with hypercoagulability (47.8% vs 23.4%, p=0.039). Group A required more intraoperative transfusion with red blood cells (p=0.014) but not platelets (p=0.6) or cryoprecipitate (p=0.8). Although group A had a higher incidence of VTE events (30.4% vs 23.4%) this was not statistically significant.\nConclusions: Baseline hypercoagulability exists in one-third of patients with peritoneal malignancy and was associated with increased tumour burden and appendiceal primary. The increasing use of ROTEM is a valuable tool for perioperative management of complex peritoneal malignancy patients.","PeriodicalId":14372,"journal":{"name":"International Surgery Journal","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20240333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is an established treatment for peritoneal malignancy. A hypercoagulable state in these patients and the associated risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), remains the most common cause of 30-day mortality. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and perioperative factors associated with baseline hypercoagulability detected by rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM), a point-of-care haemostatic assay, in peritoneal malignancy patients. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed in a peritoneal malignancy unit on patients undergoing CRS between 2019 and 2023, who underwent preoperative ROTEM testing. Patients were divided into group A (hypercoagulable) and Group B (normal coagulation). Baseline characteristics, pathology results, operative details and post operative outcomes were reviewed. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to identify factors associated with baseline hypercoagulability. Results: The 70 patients were included, 23 patients in group A (32.9%) and 47 patients in group B (67.1%). Group A had a lower preoperative haemoglobin (p<0.001), higher platelet count (p<0.001) and median peritoneal carcinomatosis index (33 vs 10, p=0.003). Appendiceal primary was associated with hypercoagulability (47.8% vs 23.4%, p=0.039). Group A required more intraoperative transfusion with red blood cells (p=0.014) but not platelets (p=0.6) or cryoprecipitate (p=0.8). Although group A had a higher incidence of VTE events (30.4% vs 23.4%) this was not statistically significant. Conclusions: Baseline hypercoagulability exists in one-third of patients with peritoneal malignancy and was associated with increased tumour burden and appendiceal primary. The increasing use of ROTEM is a valuable tool for perioperative management of complex peritoneal malignancy patients.
通过旋转血栓弹性测定法检测接受细胞再生手术的腹膜恶性肿瘤患者高凝状态的发生率和预测因素
背景:腹腔镜手术(CRS)配合腹腔内热化疗(HIPEC)是治疗腹膜恶性肿瘤的成熟疗法。这些患者的高凝状态以及与之相关的静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)风险仍是导致 30 天死亡的最常见原因。本研究旨在评估腹膜恶性肿瘤患者通过旋转血栓弹性测定法(ROTEM)(一种护理点止血测定法)检测到的基线高凝状态的发生率和围手术期相关因素:在腹膜恶性肿瘤科对2019年至2023年期间接受CRS手术、术前接受ROTEM检测的患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。患者被分为A组(高凝状态)和B组(正常凝状态)。对基线特征、病理结果、手术细节和术后结果进行了回顾。采用单变量和多变量分析来确定与基线高凝相关的因素:70名患者中,A组23人(32.9%),B组47人(67.1%)。A组患者术前血红蛋白较低(P<0.001),血小板计数较高(P<0.001),腹膜癌变指数中位数(33 vs 10,P=0.003)。阑尾原发癌与高凝相关(47.8% 对 23.4%,P=0.039)。A 组术中需要输更多红细胞(P=0.014),但不需要输血小板(P=0.6)或低温沉淀(P=0.8)。虽然 A 组的 VTE 事件发生率更高(30.4% 对 23.4%),但并无统计学意义:结论:三分之一的腹膜恶性肿瘤患者存在基线高凝状态,这与肿瘤负荷增加和阑尾原发疾病有关。越来越多地使用 ROTEM 是复杂腹膜恶性肿瘤患者围手术期管理的重要工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信