Plane Hijackings between Cuba and the United States and the Opportunity for Diplomacy (1958–1973)

Dan Porat
{"title":"Plane Hijackings between Cuba and the United States and the Opportunity for Diplomacy (1958–1973)","authors":"Dan Porat","doi":"10.1017/s0018246x24000013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Between 1958 and 1973, hijackings between Cuba and the US surged, prompting Cuban officials in the early 1960s to propose an extradition agreement for hijackers. However, the US, leveraging its superpower status, dismissed these initiatives, viewing hijackers as political asylum seekers rather than criminals. By the late 1960s, as hijackings escalated from the US to Cuba, the American approach shifted, seeking a bilateral agreement to address air piracy, only to be rebuffed by Cuba, which refused to accept the US’s categorization of specific hijackers as political asylum seekers while classifying others as criminals. Meanwhile, the US pressed its extradition stance through international bodies like the International Civil Aviation Organization. These diplomatic efforts underscored broader challenges in US–Cuban relations, with negotiations repeatedly missing opportunities for enhanced co-operation. A pivotal shift occurred after a significant incident threatened both nations, leading to a more balanced perspective between the US and Cuba. This change culminated in the 1973 signing of a ‘Memorandum of understanding’, marking a turning point that significantly curbed hijacking incidents and hinted at potential future improvements in bilateral relations.","PeriodicalId":515830,"journal":{"name":"The Historical Journal","volume":"332 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Historical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0018246x24000013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Between 1958 and 1973, hijackings between Cuba and the US surged, prompting Cuban officials in the early 1960s to propose an extradition agreement for hijackers. However, the US, leveraging its superpower status, dismissed these initiatives, viewing hijackers as political asylum seekers rather than criminals. By the late 1960s, as hijackings escalated from the US to Cuba, the American approach shifted, seeking a bilateral agreement to address air piracy, only to be rebuffed by Cuba, which refused to accept the US’s categorization of specific hijackers as political asylum seekers while classifying others as criminals. Meanwhile, the US pressed its extradition stance through international bodies like the International Civil Aviation Organization. These diplomatic efforts underscored broader challenges in US–Cuban relations, with negotiations repeatedly missing opportunities for enhanced co-operation. A pivotal shift occurred after a significant incident threatened both nations, leading to a more balanced perspective between the US and Cuba. This change culminated in the 1973 signing of a ‘Memorandum of understanding’, marking a turning point that significantly curbed hijacking incidents and hinted at potential future improvements in bilateral relations.
古巴和美国之间的劫机事件与外交机遇(1958-1973 年)
1958 年至 1973 年间,古巴和美国之间的劫机事件激增,促使古巴官员在 20 世纪 60 年代初提出引渡劫机者的协议。然而,美国利用其超级大国的地位,将劫机者视为政治避难者而非罪犯,拒绝了这些倡议。到 20 世纪 60 年代末,随着从美国到古巴的劫持事件不断升级,美国的做法发生了转变,寻求达成双边协议来解决海盗问题,但遭到了古巴的拒绝,古巴拒绝接受美国将特定劫持者归类为政治避难者,而将其他劫持者归类为罪犯的做法。与此同时,美国通过国际民用航空组织等国际机构坚持其引渡立场。这些外交努力凸显了美古关系中更广泛的挑战,谈判一再错失加强合作的机会。在一起威胁两国的重大事件发生后,美国和古巴之间的观点发生了关键性的转变。1973 年签署的 "谅解备忘录 "将这一转变推向高潮,它标志着一个转折点,极大地遏制了劫机事件的发生,并预示着双边关系未来可能的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信