Replacement of Total Abdominal Hysterectomy by TLH in a Patient with Previous Pelvic Surgery

Sharmin Afroz, Sumyia Akhter, Amena Begum, Asma Begum
{"title":"Replacement of Total Abdominal Hysterectomy by TLH in a Patient with Previous Pelvic Surgery","authors":"Sharmin Afroz, Sumyia Akhter, Amena Begum, Asma Begum","doi":"10.36347/sjams.2024.v12i02.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In a patient who had previous pelvic surgery, total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) has well-established advantages over total abdominal hysterectomy. The hysterectomy is a common gynaecological operation. Although the vaginal route is preferred for hysterectomy, the best route for women who are not candidates for the vaginal approach is unknown. Hysterectomies are increasingly being performed laparoscopically as technology advances and experience grows. Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate the replacement of total abdominal hysterectomy by TLH in a patient with previous pelvic surgery. Method: This observational study was carried out on 60 women admitted in the Department of obstetrics and gynaecology, Labaid specialized Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh during the study period. The duration of the period was from July 2021 to June 2022. The data for this study about had been accumulated from patients sociodemographic & obstetrics information, physical examination and per-operative findings. Statistical evaluation of the results used to be got via the use of a window-based computer software program devised with Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS-24). Results: A total of 60 patients were included in final analysis. According to the study population's age distribution of the study population, it was observed that 15(25.0%) were in group 35-38, 23(38.33%) were in group 39-42, 16(26.66%) were in group 43-46 and 6(10.0%) were in group 47-50. according to patient demographics, it was observed that 44(73.33%) were Leiomyoma, 29(48.33%) were Bleeding, 3(5.0%) were Pelvic pressure, 19(31.66) were Pelvic pain and 15(0%) were size growth. Conclusion: TLH for endometrial pathology has few problems and is well tolerated by a restricted group of patients. For suitable patients, the benefits include decreased blood loss and a shorter hospital stay. TLH can be performed effectively despite previous abdominal surgery. Patients who had previous .......","PeriodicalId":504829,"journal":{"name":"Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36347/sjams.2024.v12i02.013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In a patient who had previous pelvic surgery, total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) has well-established advantages over total abdominal hysterectomy. The hysterectomy is a common gynaecological operation. Although the vaginal route is preferred for hysterectomy, the best route for women who are not candidates for the vaginal approach is unknown. Hysterectomies are increasingly being performed laparoscopically as technology advances and experience grows. Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate the replacement of total abdominal hysterectomy by TLH in a patient with previous pelvic surgery. Method: This observational study was carried out on 60 women admitted in the Department of obstetrics and gynaecology, Labaid specialized Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh during the study period. The duration of the period was from July 2021 to June 2022. The data for this study about had been accumulated from patients sociodemographic & obstetrics information, physical examination and per-operative findings. Statistical evaluation of the results used to be got via the use of a window-based computer software program devised with Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS-24). Results: A total of 60 patients were included in final analysis. According to the study population's age distribution of the study population, it was observed that 15(25.0%) were in group 35-38, 23(38.33%) were in group 39-42, 16(26.66%) were in group 43-46 and 6(10.0%) were in group 47-50. according to patient demographics, it was observed that 44(73.33%) were Leiomyoma, 29(48.33%) were Bleeding, 3(5.0%) were Pelvic pressure, 19(31.66) were Pelvic pain and 15(0%) were size growth. Conclusion: TLH for endometrial pathology has few problems and is well tolerated by a restricted group of patients. For suitable patients, the benefits include decreased blood loss and a shorter hospital stay. TLH can be performed effectively despite previous abdominal surgery. Patients who had previous .......
曾接受过盆腔手术的患者以 TLH 代替全腹子宫切除术
背景:对于曾接受过盆腔手术的患者,全腹腔镜子宫切除术(TLH)与全腹腔镜子宫切除术相比具有公认的优势。子宫切除术是一种常见的妇科手术。虽然阴道途径是子宫切除术的首选,但对于不适合阴道途径的妇女来说,最佳途径尚不清楚。随着技术的进步和经验的增加,越来越多的子宫切除术在腹腔镜下进行。研究目的本研究旨在对曾接受过盆腔手术的患者用腹腔镜子宫切除术取代全腹子宫切除术进行评估。方法:本观察性研究在研究期间对孟加拉国达卡拉贝德专科医院妇产科的 60 名妇女进行了观察。研究时间为 2021 年 7 月至 2022 年 6 月。本研究的数据来自患者的社会人口学和产科信息、体格检查和围手术期结果。研究结果的统计评估是通过使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS-24)设计的基于窗口的计算机软件进行的。结果:共有 60 名患者被纳入最终分析。根据研究人群的年龄分布,观察到 35-38 岁组有 15 人(25.0%),39-42 岁组有 23 人(38.33%),43-46 岁组有 16 人(26.66%),47-50 岁组有 6 人(10.根据患者的人口统计学特征,观察到 44(73.33%)例患者为子宫肌瘤,29(48.33%)例患者为出血,3(5.0%)例患者为盆腔压迫,19(31.66%)例患者为盆腔疼痛,15(0%)例患者为体积增大。结论TLH 治疗子宫内膜病变的问题很少,少数患者可以很好地耐受。对于合适的患者来说,TLH 的好处包括减少失血量和缩短住院时间。尽管曾进行过腹部手术,TLH 仍可有效实施。曾接受过 .......
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信