Formalizing ethical principles within AI systems: experts’ opinions on why (not) and how to do it

Franziska Poszler, Edy Portmann, Christoph Lütge
{"title":"Formalizing ethical principles within AI systems: experts’ opinions on why (not) and how to do it","authors":"Franziska Poszler,&nbsp;Edy Portmann,&nbsp;Christoph Lütge","doi":"10.1007/s43681-024-00425-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>AI systems are increasingly put into contexts where computed decisions must be guided by ethical considerations. To develop ethically grounded algorithms and technologies, scholars have suggested computational ethics as an essential frontier, which aims to translate ethical principles into computer code. However, computational ethics has received little attention in academic literature so far, with existing work mainly focusing on its technical implementation, while many open questions concerning its (societal and ethical) implications still need to be resolved. Therefore, in this study, we interviewed 12 experts from philosophy, AI and cognitive sciences to shed light on computational ethics beyond a technical perspective. Findings suggest that indicated supporting and opposing arguments can be clustered into pragmatic/practical, societal and epistemic reasons, all of which need to be contemplated when engaging in computational ethics and developing resulting artificial moral agents. Furthermore, the mentioned recommendations for companies’ technological design and development, for industry’s governance measures and academia’s research endeavors are recapitulated and summarized in a holistic framework that aims to facilitate a reflected implementation of ‘ethics in and by design’ in the future.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72137,"journal":{"name":"AI and ethics","volume":"5 2","pages":"937 - 965"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s43681-024-00425-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI and ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-024-00425-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AI systems are increasingly put into contexts where computed decisions must be guided by ethical considerations. To develop ethically grounded algorithms and technologies, scholars have suggested computational ethics as an essential frontier, which aims to translate ethical principles into computer code. However, computational ethics has received little attention in academic literature so far, with existing work mainly focusing on its technical implementation, while many open questions concerning its (societal and ethical) implications still need to be resolved. Therefore, in this study, we interviewed 12 experts from philosophy, AI and cognitive sciences to shed light on computational ethics beyond a technical perspective. Findings suggest that indicated supporting and opposing arguments can be clustered into pragmatic/practical, societal and epistemic reasons, all of which need to be contemplated when engaging in computational ethics and developing resulting artificial moral agents. Furthermore, the mentioned recommendations for companies’ technological design and development, for industry’s governance measures and academia’s research endeavors are recapitulated and summarized in a holistic framework that aims to facilitate a reflected implementation of ‘ethics in and by design’ in the future.

在人工智能系统中正式确立伦理原则:专家们关于为什么(不)和如何做的意见
人工智能系统越来越多地被置于必须以道德考虑为指导的计算决策环境中。为了开发基于伦理的算法和技术,学者们建议将计算伦理学作为一个基本前沿,旨在将伦理原则转化为计算机代码。然而,到目前为止,计算伦理学在学术文献中受到的关注很少,现有的工作主要集中在其技术实现上,而许多关于其(社会和伦理)影响的开放性问题仍然需要解决。因此,在这项研究中,我们采访了12位来自哲学、人工智能和认知科学的专家,以揭示超越技术视角的计算伦理。研究结果表明,支持和反对的论点可以归结为实用/实用、社会和认知的原因,所有这些都需要在从事计算伦理学和开发由此产生的人工道德主体时加以考虑。此外,上述对公司技术设计和开发、行业治理措施和学术界研究努力的建议在一个整体框架中进行了概括和总结,旨在促进未来“设计中的道德”的反映实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信