The True Infinity of the Living: The Hegelian Infrastructure of Hägglund's This Life

Hegel bulletin Pub Date : 2024-02-19 DOI:10.1017/hgl.2023.33
Gene Flenady
{"title":"The True Infinity of the Living: The Hegelian Infrastructure of Hägglund's This Life","authors":"Gene Flenady","doi":"10.1017/hgl.2023.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Although the concept of ‘true infinity’ is undoubtedly central to Hegel's philosophy, the Anglophone rehabilitation of Hegel as a post-Kantian critical philosopher has avoided any sustained interpretive confrontation with the concept. In this paper, I provide a revisionary reconstruction of Hegelian true infinity by engaging with Martin Hägglund's argument in This Life (2019) for the centrality of finitude to Hegel's philosophy. For Hägglund, Hegel's philosophy effects a ‘secular reconciliation’ with finitude by demonstrating that our mortality is not a negative condition to be overcome; rather, mortality is constitutive of rational social agency or ‘spiritual life’. While Hägglund's interpretive emphasis on finitude prima facie occludes a consideration of the concept of true infinity, I show that Hägglund's understanding of spiritual life in terms of the dynamic of self-maintenance implicitly articulates a revisionary understanding of true infinity as instantiated in and through the activity of finite living rational beings. More specifically, I show that Hägglund's understanding of finitude as constitutive of spiritual life is grounded in three closely interrelated Hegelian meta-concepts, all of which Hegel derives in the second chapter of the Logic (‘Existence’): (a) the distinction between abstract and determinate negation; (b) the form of individuality as constituted through determinate negation; and (c) true infinity as the form of individuality understood in explicitly processual terms. I thus ground a deflationary interpretation of true infinity in Hegel's logical account of determinate individuality, and at the same time, contribute to This Life's ongoing critical reception by articulating its Hegelian logical infrastructure.","PeriodicalId":495323,"journal":{"name":"Hegel bulletin","volume":"129 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hegel bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/hgl.2023.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although the concept of ‘true infinity’ is undoubtedly central to Hegel's philosophy, the Anglophone rehabilitation of Hegel as a post-Kantian critical philosopher has avoided any sustained interpretive confrontation with the concept. In this paper, I provide a revisionary reconstruction of Hegelian true infinity by engaging with Martin Hägglund's argument in This Life (2019) for the centrality of finitude to Hegel's philosophy. For Hägglund, Hegel's philosophy effects a ‘secular reconciliation’ with finitude by demonstrating that our mortality is not a negative condition to be overcome; rather, mortality is constitutive of rational social agency or ‘spiritual life’. While Hägglund's interpretive emphasis on finitude prima facie occludes a consideration of the concept of true infinity, I show that Hägglund's understanding of spiritual life in terms of the dynamic of self-maintenance implicitly articulates a revisionary understanding of true infinity as instantiated in and through the activity of finite living rational beings. More specifically, I show that Hägglund's understanding of finitude as constitutive of spiritual life is grounded in three closely interrelated Hegelian meta-concepts, all of which Hegel derives in the second chapter of the Logic (‘Existence’): (a) the distinction between abstract and determinate negation; (b) the form of individuality as constituted through determinate negation; and (c) true infinity as the form of individuality understood in explicitly processual terms. I thus ground a deflationary interpretation of true infinity in Hegel's logical account of determinate individuality, and at the same time, contribute to This Life's ongoing critical reception by articulating its Hegelian logical infrastructure.
生命的真正无限:海格伦德《今生》的黑格尔基础结构
尽管 "真无限 "这一概念无疑是黑格尔哲学的核心,但作为后康德批判哲学家的黑格尔在英语国家的复兴却避免了对这一概念进行任何持续的解释性对抗。在本文中,我通过与马丁-海格伦德(Martin Hägglund)在《今生》(2019)中关于有限性在黑格尔哲学中的核心地位的论证进行互动,对黑格尔的真无限性进行了修正性的重建。在海格伦德看来,黑格尔哲学通过证明我们的死亡并不是一种需要克服的消极条件,从而实现了与有限性的 "世俗和解";相反,死亡是理性社会机构或 "精神生活 "的构成要素。虽然海格伦对有限性的解释性强调表面上遮蔽了对真正无限性概念的思考,但我要说明的是,海格伦从自我维护的动态角度对精神生活的理解隐含地阐明了对真正无限性的修正性理解,即真正无限性是在有限的理性生命的活动中并通过这种活动而实现的。更具体地说,我表明,海格伦对有限性作为精神生活构成要素的理解,是以黑格尔的三个密切相关的元概念为基础的,所有这些概念都是黑格尔在《逻辑学》第二章("存在")中引申出来的:(a) 抽象的否定与确定的否定之间的区别;(b) 通过确定的否定构成的个体性形式;(c) 作为以明确的过程性术语理解的个体性形式的真无限性。因此,我以黑格尔关于确定的个体性的逻辑论述为基础,对真正的无限性进行了通货紧缩式的阐释,同时,通过阐明《今生》的黑格尔逻辑基础结构,为《今生》正在进行的批判性接受做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书