{"title":"A Comparative Analysis of Energy Consumption in Various Wireless Sensor Network Techniques","authors":"Suresh Vellaiyan, Vijayarani N","doi":"10.54392/irjmt2428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study is to analyze the energy consumption associated with modern methodologies utilized in wireless sensor networks and to conduct a comparative assessment with Reed Solomon (RS) codes. This paper presents three discrete techniques for wireless sensor networks. The strategies mentioned include the Self-Evolving Sensor System (SESS), the Secure and Adaptive Key Management utilizing Multipath Routing Protocol (SAKM-MRP), and the National Instruments Secure Reference-based Data Aggregation (NI-SRDA). A distinct algorithm was developed for each method to examine the energy use. Based on the experimental results, it has been shown that the RS-codes approach consumes a considerably greater quantity of energy compared to the SESS methods, which, in contrast, exhibit a significantly lower energy consumption. When comparing the efficiency of RS-codes and SESS methods, it is observed that the SAKN-MRP technique exhibits a more significant decrease in energy consumption. Compared to the RS-Codes system, the SESS scheme stands out with a significant 45.5% reduction in energy usage at the maximum delivery node. Similarly, the SAKM-MRP scheme showcases an average decrease of 35.7% in energy consumption. Notably, the NI-SRDA scheme achieves an impressive 60% reduction in energy consumption, underscoring its remarkable impact on energy efficiency. In a broader sense, it can be inferred that the NI-SDRA technique holds promise as an energy-efficient solution for wireless sensor networks in comparison to alternative strategies suggested in the current study.","PeriodicalId":14412,"journal":{"name":"International Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Technovation","volume":"248 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Technovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54392/irjmt2428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The objective of this study is to analyze the energy consumption associated with modern methodologies utilized in wireless sensor networks and to conduct a comparative assessment with Reed Solomon (RS) codes. This paper presents three discrete techniques for wireless sensor networks. The strategies mentioned include the Self-Evolving Sensor System (SESS), the Secure and Adaptive Key Management utilizing Multipath Routing Protocol (SAKM-MRP), and the National Instruments Secure Reference-based Data Aggregation (NI-SRDA). A distinct algorithm was developed for each method to examine the energy use. Based on the experimental results, it has been shown that the RS-codes approach consumes a considerably greater quantity of energy compared to the SESS methods, which, in contrast, exhibit a significantly lower energy consumption. When comparing the efficiency of RS-codes and SESS methods, it is observed that the SAKN-MRP technique exhibits a more significant decrease in energy consumption. Compared to the RS-Codes system, the SESS scheme stands out with a significant 45.5% reduction in energy usage at the maximum delivery node. Similarly, the SAKM-MRP scheme showcases an average decrease of 35.7% in energy consumption. Notably, the NI-SRDA scheme achieves an impressive 60% reduction in energy consumption, underscoring its remarkable impact on energy efficiency. In a broader sense, it can be inferred that the NI-SDRA technique holds promise as an energy-efficient solution for wireless sensor networks in comparison to alternative strategies suggested in the current study.