Globally consistent estimates of high-resolution Antarctic ice mass balance and spatially resolved glacial isostatic adjustment

M. Willen, M. Horwath, E. Buchta, M. Scheinert, Veit Helm, B. Uebbing, Jürgen Kusche
{"title":"Globally consistent estimates of high-resolution Antarctic ice mass balance and spatially resolved glacial isostatic adjustment","authors":"M. Willen, M. Horwath, E. Buchta, M. Scheinert, Veit Helm, B. Uebbing, Jürgen Kusche","doi":"10.5194/tc-18-775-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. A detailed understanding of how the Antarctic ice sheet (AIS) responds to a warming climate is needed because it will most likely increase the rate of global mean sea level rise. Time-variable satellite gravimetry, realized by the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment Follow-On (GRACE-FO) missions, is directly sensitive to AIS mass changes. However, gravimetric mass balances are subject to two major limitations. First, the usual correction of the glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) effect by modelling results is a dominant source of uncertainty. Second, satellite gravimetry allows for a resolution of a few hundred kilometres only, which is insufficient to thoroughly explore causes of AIS imbalance. We have overcome both limitations by the first global inversion of data from GRACE and GRACE-FO, satellite altimetry (CryoSat-2), regional climate modelling (RACMO2), and firn densification modelling (IMAU-FDM). The inversion spatially resolves GIA in Antarctica independently from GIA modelling jointly with changes of ice mass and firn air content at 50 km resolution. We find an AIS mass balance of −144 ± 27 Gt a−1 from January 2011 to December 2020. This estimate is the same, within uncertainties, as the statistical analysis of 23 different mass balances evaluated in the Ice sheet Mass Balance Inter-comparison Exercise (IMBIE; Otosaka et al., 2023b). The co-estimated GIA corresponds to an integrated mass effect of 86 ± 21 Gt a−1 over Antarctica, and it fits better with global navigation satellite system (GNSS) results than other GIA predictions. From propagating covariances to integrals, we find a correlation coefficient of −0.97 between the AIS mass balance and the GIA estimate. Sensitivity tests with alternative input data sets lead to results within assessed uncertainties.\n","PeriodicalId":509217,"journal":{"name":"The Cryosphere","volume":"211 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cryosphere","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-775-2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. A detailed understanding of how the Antarctic ice sheet (AIS) responds to a warming climate is needed because it will most likely increase the rate of global mean sea level rise. Time-variable satellite gravimetry, realized by the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment Follow-On (GRACE-FO) missions, is directly sensitive to AIS mass changes. However, gravimetric mass balances are subject to two major limitations. First, the usual correction of the glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) effect by modelling results is a dominant source of uncertainty. Second, satellite gravimetry allows for a resolution of a few hundred kilometres only, which is insufficient to thoroughly explore causes of AIS imbalance. We have overcome both limitations by the first global inversion of data from GRACE and GRACE-FO, satellite altimetry (CryoSat-2), regional climate modelling (RACMO2), and firn densification modelling (IMAU-FDM). The inversion spatially resolves GIA in Antarctica independently from GIA modelling jointly with changes of ice mass and firn air content at 50 km resolution. We find an AIS mass balance of −144 ± 27 Gt a−1 from January 2011 to December 2020. This estimate is the same, within uncertainties, as the statistical analysis of 23 different mass balances evaluated in the Ice sheet Mass Balance Inter-comparison Exercise (IMBIE; Otosaka et al., 2023b). The co-estimated GIA corresponds to an integrated mass effect of 86 ± 21 Gt a−1 over Antarctica, and it fits better with global navigation satellite system (GNSS) results than other GIA predictions. From propagating covariances to integrals, we find a correlation coefficient of −0.97 between the AIS mass balance and the GIA estimate. Sensitivity tests with alternative input data sets lead to results within assessed uncertainties.
对高分辨率南极冰质量平衡和空间分辨率冰川等静力调整的全球一致估算
摘要。我们需要详细了解南极冰盖(AIS)如何对气候变暖做出反应,因为气候变暖很可能会增加全球平均海平面的上升速度。重力恢复与气候实验(GRACE)和重力恢复与气候实验后续任务(GRACE-FO)实现的时变卫星重力测量法对南极冰盖质量变化直接敏感。然而,重力质量平衡受到两大限制。首先,建模结果对冰川等静力调整(GIA)效应的通常校正是不确定性的主要来源。其次,卫星重力测量的分辨率只有几百公里,不足以深入探讨冰川地表不平衡的原因。我们克服了这两个限制,首次对来自全球大气环流探测卫星(GRACE)和全球大气环流探测卫星(GRACE-FO)、卫星测高(CryoSat-2)、区域气候建模(RACMO2)和冷杉致密化建模(IMAU-FDM)的数据进行了全球反演。反演从空间上解析了南极洲的全球影响评估,与全球影响评估建模以及 50 千米分辨率的冰质量和杉林空气含量变化相结合。我们发现,从 2011 年 1 月到 2020 年 12 月,南极洲国际空间站的质量平衡为-144 ± 27 Gt a-1。在不确定范围内,这一估计值与冰盖质量平衡相互比较工作(IMBIE;Otosaka 等,2023b)中评估的 23 种不同质量平衡的统计分析结果相同。共同估算的全球增量影响相当于南极上空 86 ± 21 Gt a-1 的综合质量效应,与其他全球增量影响预测相比,更符合全球导航卫星系统(GNSS)的结果。从传播协方差到积分,我们发现 AIS 质量平衡与 GIA 估计之间的相关系数为 -0.97。用其他输入数据集进行敏感性测试,得出的结果在评估的不确定性范围内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信