Post-clustering Prioritization Framework for Autonomous Decision Making in the Absence of Ground Truth via Hypothetical Probing

Wolfgang Fink, Karm Al Hajhog
{"title":"Post-clustering Prioritization Framework for Autonomous Decision Making in the Absence of Ground Truth via Hypothetical Probing","authors":"Wolfgang Fink, Karm Al Hajhog","doi":"10.36001/ijphm.2024.v15i1.3206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A generic prioritization framework is introduced for addressing the problem of automated prioritization of region of interest or target selection. The framework is based on the assumption that clustering of preliminary data for preidentified regions or targets of interest within an operational area has already occurred, i.e., post-classification, and that the clustering quality can be expressed as an energy/objective function. Region or target of interest prioritization then means to rank regions or targets of interest according to their probability of changing the energy/objective function value upon subsequent hypothetical probing as opposed to actually conducted reexamination, i.e., thorough follow-up or in-situ measurements. The mathematical formalism for calculating these probabilities to contribute to this change of the energy/objective function value is introduced and validated through numerical simulations. Moreover, these probabilities can also be understood as a confidence-check of the classification, i.e., the pre-clustering of the preliminary data. The operation of the prioritization framework is independent of the algorithm used to pre-cluster the preliminary data, and supports autonomous decision-making. It is widely applicable across many scientific disciplines and areas, ranging from the microscopic to the macroscopic scale. Due to its ability to help maximize scientific return while optimizing resource utilization, it is particularly relevant in the context of resource-constrained autonomous robotic planetary exploration as it may extend the Remaining Useful Lifetime (RUL) – a key aspect in Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) – of space missions. On a more general, PHM-relevant level, the prioritization framework may provide an additional mechanism of identifying and correcting the maintenance status of system components to assist predictive maintenance or condition-based maintenance.","PeriodicalId":502775,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management","volume":"98 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36001/ijphm.2024.v15i1.3206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A generic prioritization framework is introduced for addressing the problem of automated prioritization of region of interest or target selection. The framework is based on the assumption that clustering of preliminary data for preidentified regions or targets of interest within an operational area has already occurred, i.e., post-classification, and that the clustering quality can be expressed as an energy/objective function. Region or target of interest prioritization then means to rank regions or targets of interest according to their probability of changing the energy/objective function value upon subsequent hypothetical probing as opposed to actually conducted reexamination, i.e., thorough follow-up or in-situ measurements. The mathematical formalism for calculating these probabilities to contribute to this change of the energy/objective function value is introduced and validated through numerical simulations. Moreover, these probabilities can also be understood as a confidence-check of the classification, i.e., the pre-clustering of the preliminary data. The operation of the prioritization framework is independent of the algorithm used to pre-cluster the preliminary data, and supports autonomous decision-making. It is widely applicable across many scientific disciplines and areas, ranging from the microscopic to the macroscopic scale. Due to its ability to help maximize scientific return while optimizing resource utilization, it is particularly relevant in the context of resource-constrained autonomous robotic planetary exploration as it may extend the Remaining Useful Lifetime (RUL) – a key aspect in Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) – of space missions. On a more general, PHM-relevant level, the prioritization framework may provide an additional mechanism of identifying and correcting the maintenance status of system components to assist predictive maintenance or condition-based maintenance.
通过假设探究在缺乏地面实况的情况下自主决策的后聚类优先排序框架
为解决感兴趣区域或目标选择的自动优先排序问题,引入了一个通用优先排序框架。该框架基于以下假设:在一个业务区域内,已经对预先确定的感兴趣区域或目标的初步数据进行了聚类,即分类后聚类,聚类质量可以用能量/目标函数表示。感兴趣区域或目标的优先排序是指根据感兴趣区域或目标在后续假设探测(而不是实际进行的复查,即彻底的后续测量或现场测量)时改变能量/目标函数值的概率进行排序。通过数值模拟,介绍并验证了计算这些导致能量/目标函数值变化的概率的数学形式。此外,这些概率也可以理解为分类的置信度检查,即对初步数据的预聚类。优先级排序框架的运行与用于对初步数据进行预聚类的算法无关,并支持自主决策。它广泛适用于从微观到宏观尺度的多个科学学科和领域。由于它能够在优化资源利用的同时帮助实现科学回报最大化,因此与资源受限的自主行星探测机器人特别相关,因为它可以延长太空任务的剩余有用寿命(RUL)--这是诊断和健康管理(PHM)的一个关键方面。在更一般的、与健康管理相关的层面上,优先排序框架可提供一个额外的机制,用于识别和纠正系统组件的维护状态,以协助预测性维护或基于状态的维护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信