Dzieje kultury europejskiej i polskiej XVIII wieku w ujęciu polskich uczonych w XX stuleciu. Wybrane zagadnienia

Marian Chachaj
{"title":"Dzieje kultury europejskiej i polskiej XVIII wieku w ujęciu polskich uczonych w XX stuleciu. Wybrane zagadnienia","authors":"Marian Chachaj","doi":"10.24425/hsm.2023.147374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses the dispute over the chronology of the Enlightenment in Poland and the views of Józef Gierowski and Jacek Staszewski regarding the assessment of the Saxon times and the origins of the Polish Enlightenment. The problem of the reception of Western cultures (French, English, Italian and German) in the times of the Enlightenment in Poland was also treated more broadly. After presenting various understandings of culture in Polish historiography, the positions of Polish researchers on the assessment of the Enlightenment in Europe (Emanuel Rostworowski) and then the culture of the Saxon times and the Enlightenment in Poland (Józef Andrzej Gierowski, Janusz Maciejewski, Jacek Staszewski) were discussed. The achievements of Polish historiography in the field of research on the reception in Poland of the works of the most eminent authors of the French Enlightenment (these were primarily Voltaire, Rousseau, Diderot, Montesquieu), English (including Locke), Italian (Genovesi, Beccaria) and German (including Wolff, Gottsched) were shown in greater detail. The reception of this work would not have been possible without the appearance in Poland of an intellectual elite, often speaking French, who were able to evaluate and appreciate the innovative views of Western writers and philosophers.","PeriodicalId":398182,"journal":{"name":"Historyka Studia Metodologiczne","volume":"360 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historyka Studia Metodologiczne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24425/hsm.2023.147374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article discusses the dispute over the chronology of the Enlightenment in Poland and the views of Józef Gierowski and Jacek Staszewski regarding the assessment of the Saxon times and the origins of the Polish Enlightenment. The problem of the reception of Western cultures (French, English, Italian and German) in the times of the Enlightenment in Poland was also treated more broadly. After presenting various understandings of culture in Polish historiography, the positions of Polish researchers on the assessment of the Enlightenment in Europe (Emanuel Rostworowski) and then the culture of the Saxon times and the Enlightenment in Poland (Józef Andrzej Gierowski, Janusz Maciejewski, Jacek Staszewski) were discussed. The achievements of Polish historiography in the field of research on the reception in Poland of the works of the most eminent authors of the French Enlightenment (these were primarily Voltaire, Rousseau, Diderot, Montesquieu), English (including Locke), Italian (Genovesi, Beccaria) and German (including Wolff, Gottsched) were shown in greater detail. The reception of this work would not have been possible without the appearance in Poland of an intellectual elite, often speaking French, who were able to evaluate and appreciate the innovative views of Western writers and philosophers.
二十世纪波兰学者眼中的十八世纪欧洲和波兰文化史。部分问题
文章讨论了波兰启蒙运动年代学方面的争议,以及约瑟夫-吉耶罗夫斯基(Józef Gierowski)和雅切克-斯塔谢夫斯基(Jacek Staszewski)关于萨克森时代的评估和波兰启蒙运动起源的观点。此外,还更广泛地探讨了启蒙运动时期波兰对西方文化(法国、英国、意大利和德国)的接受问题。在介绍了波兰史学界对文化的各种理解之后,讨论了波兰研究人员对欧洲启蒙运动的评估立场(伊曼纽尔-罗斯特沃罗夫斯基),然后是撒克逊时代的文化和波兰的启蒙运动(约瑟夫-安杰伊-吉耶罗夫斯基、雅努什-马谢耶夫斯基、雅切克-斯塔谢夫斯基)。更详细地介绍了波兰历史学在研究法国启蒙运动(主要是伏尔泰、卢梭、狄德罗、孟德斯鸠)、英国启蒙运动(包括洛克)、意大利启蒙运动(热诺维西、贝卡利亚)和德国启蒙运动(包括沃尔夫、哥特舒德)最杰出作家的作品在波兰的接受情况方面所取得的成就。如果波兰没有出现一批知识精英,他们通常讲法语,能够评价和欣赏西方作家和哲学家的创新观点,这些作品就不可能受到欢迎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书