Irenaeus’ Theology in Second-Century Platonism and Christianity

Grayden McCashen
{"title":"Irenaeus’ Theology in Second-Century Platonism and Christianity","authors":"Grayden McCashen","doi":"10.1093/jts/flae007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n As scholars have come to appreciate Irenaeus’ use of philosophy, emphasis has fallen on his use of pre-Socratic traditions. This emphasis stands in stark contrast to the typical emphasis scholars place on Platonic themes in second-century Christian theologies. This article argues that Platonic resources, the definition of God as simple and incomposite, the Platonic viae, and reasoning from ‘oneness’ to ‘unlimitedness’, play a key role in Irenaeus’ theology, governing his interpretation of pre-Socratic materials, including Irenaeus’ version of the well-known Xenophanes quotation (fr. 24) and materials Irenaeus apparently draws from Pseudo-Aristotle’s On Melissus, Xenophanes, and Gorgias. Irenaeus, furthermore, draws a logical connection between God’s simplicity and the doctrine that there is one God to the exclusion of others, as he says, thereby pressing Platonic doctrine into the service of his distinctly Christian theological convictions. The upshot of all this is a deeper appreciation first for the sophistication of Irenaeus’ own theology, and second for Irenaeus’ role in engaging and advancing Christian philosophical theology.","PeriodicalId":213560,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Theological Studies","volume":"539 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Theological Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jts/flae007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As scholars have come to appreciate Irenaeus’ use of philosophy, emphasis has fallen on his use of pre-Socratic traditions. This emphasis stands in stark contrast to the typical emphasis scholars place on Platonic themes in second-century Christian theologies. This article argues that Platonic resources, the definition of God as simple and incomposite, the Platonic viae, and reasoning from ‘oneness’ to ‘unlimitedness’, play a key role in Irenaeus’ theology, governing his interpretation of pre-Socratic materials, including Irenaeus’ version of the well-known Xenophanes quotation (fr. 24) and materials Irenaeus apparently draws from Pseudo-Aristotle’s On Melissus, Xenophanes, and Gorgias. Irenaeus, furthermore, draws a logical connection between God’s simplicity and the doctrine that there is one God to the exclusion of others, as he says, thereby pressing Platonic doctrine into the service of his distinctly Christian theological convictions. The upshot of all this is a deeper appreciation first for the sophistication of Irenaeus’ own theology, and second for Irenaeus’ role in engaging and advancing Christian philosophical theology.
爱任纽的神学在第二世纪柏拉图主义和基督教中的应用
随着学者们逐渐了解爱任纽对哲学的运用,人们开始强调他对前苏格拉底传统的运用。这种强调与学者们在二世纪基督教神学中对柏拉图主题的典型强调形成了鲜明的对比。本文认为,柏拉图式的资源、上帝简单而不复合的定义、柏拉图式的viae以及从 "本体 "到 "无限 "的推理,在爱任纽的神学中发挥了关键作用,支配着他对前苏格拉底材料的解释,包括爱任纽对著名的色诺芬语录(fr. 24)的版本,以及爱任纽显然从伪亚里士多德的《论梅利索斯》、色诺芬和高尔吉亚那里汲取的材料。此外,爱任纽还将上帝的单纯性与他所说的 "只有一个上帝 "和 "排除其他上帝 "的学说建立了逻辑联系,从而将柏拉图的学说应用于他独特的基督教神学信念中。这一切的结果是,我们首先对爱任纽自身神学的复杂性有了更深的认识,其次对爱任纽在参与和推进基督教哲学神学方面所起的作用有了更深的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信