Behavioral Public Administration (BPA): The Need for a New Field (Literature Review)

Gvantsa Dzidziguri
{"title":"Behavioral Public Administration (BPA): The Need for a New Field (Literature Review)","authors":"Gvantsa Dzidziguri","doi":"10.19044/esj.2024.v20n37p42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modern scientific literature agrees on the issue that it is impossible to perceive public administration as a separate field. Public administration as a field, by general definition, includes the implementation of public policy and the structure and work of various actors (state or non-state) involved in the implementation process. Due to the voluminous nature of the mentioned field, it is not appropriate to consider them separately, because the organizations involved in the process of public policy implementation are not self-generated structures but each organization relies on human resources. Therefore, in the agenda of the scientific space, together with the research in the field of public administration, there was a need to use the results of the research of behavioral science. \nThe paper specifically deals with the issue of analyzing the necessity of behavioral public administration as a field, which is analyzed through a literature review. The sources used to analyze the mentioned issue include relevant scientific articles and books. \nThe purpose of the study is to determine and analyze the connection between behavioral science and the field of public administration, and the effectiveness of their combination, which leads to the broader goal of the study, which should answer the question of the necessity and effectiveness of the existence of behavioral public administration as a field. \nThe relevance of the research stems from the broad nature of the field of public administration, which puts on the agenda the need to combine the achievements of various adjacent fields.","PeriodicalId":12225,"journal":{"name":"European Scientific Journal, ESJ","volume":"149 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Scientific Journal, ESJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2024.v20n37p42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Modern scientific literature agrees on the issue that it is impossible to perceive public administration as a separate field. Public administration as a field, by general definition, includes the implementation of public policy and the structure and work of various actors (state or non-state) involved in the implementation process. Due to the voluminous nature of the mentioned field, it is not appropriate to consider them separately, because the organizations involved in the process of public policy implementation are not self-generated structures but each organization relies on human resources. Therefore, in the agenda of the scientific space, together with the research in the field of public administration, there was a need to use the results of the research of behavioral science. The paper specifically deals with the issue of analyzing the necessity of behavioral public administration as a field, which is analyzed through a literature review. The sources used to analyze the mentioned issue include relevant scientific articles and books. The purpose of the study is to determine and analyze the connection between behavioral science and the field of public administration, and the effectiveness of their combination, which leads to the broader goal of the study, which should answer the question of the necessity and effectiveness of the existence of behavioral public administration as a field. The relevance of the research stems from the broad nature of the field of public administration, which puts on the agenda the need to combine the achievements of various adjacent fields.
行为公共管理(BPA):建立新领域的必要性(文献综述)
现代科学文献一致认为,不可能将公共行政视为一个独立的领域。根据一般定义,公共行政作为一个领域,包括公共政策的执行以及参与执行过程的各种行为者(国家或非国家行为者)的结构和工作。由于上述领域内容繁多,将其分开考虑并不合适,因为参与公共政策执行过程的组织并不是自发形成的结构,而是每个组织都依赖于人力资源。因此,在科学领域的议程中,除了公共行政领域的研究之外,还需要利用行为科学的研究成果。本文通过文献综述分析了行为学公共管理作为一个领域的必要性。用于分析上述问题的资料来源包括相关的科学文章和书籍。研究的目的是确定和分析行为科学与公共行政领域之间的联系,以及二者结合的有效性,这就引出了研究的更广泛目标,即应回答行为公共行政作为一个领域存在的必要性和有效性问题。研究的相关性源于公共行政领域的广泛性,它将结合各相邻领域成就的必要性提上了议事日程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信