Early Perceptions of Teaching and Learning Using Generative AI in Higher Education

Amanda D. Damiano, E. Lauría, Christian Sarmiento, Ningjing Zhao
{"title":"Early Perceptions of Teaching and Learning Using Generative AI in Higher Education","authors":"Amanda D. Damiano, E. Lauría, Christian Sarmiento, Ningjing Zhao","doi":"10.1177/00472395241233290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This project explored perceptions of ChatGPT in higher education among students and faculty to assess teaching and learning implications of this Generative Artificial Intelligence (Generative AI)–based novel tool. Two theoretical frameworks inspired the project, including Diffusion of Innovation theory (Rogers, 1962) and Technology Acceptance Model (Davis, 1989). An online survey was completed by 380 participants ( N = 380). Participants indicated that they would not use ChatGPT to plagiarize but believed others would. When asked to rate the accuracy of ChatGPT's output, more than half took the incorrect output as correct/somewhat correct or could not tell whether it was correct or incorrect. Results varied based on participant demographics, including age, gender, and occupation. These findings support the need for data literacy. If Generative AI is to be used in higher education to aid in the learning process, it is imperative to continue teaching critical thinking.","PeriodicalId":300288,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Technology Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational Technology Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395241233290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This project explored perceptions of ChatGPT in higher education among students and faculty to assess teaching and learning implications of this Generative Artificial Intelligence (Generative AI)–based novel tool. Two theoretical frameworks inspired the project, including Diffusion of Innovation theory (Rogers, 1962) and Technology Acceptance Model (Davis, 1989). An online survey was completed by 380 participants ( N = 380). Participants indicated that they would not use ChatGPT to plagiarize but believed others would. When asked to rate the accuracy of ChatGPT's output, more than half took the incorrect output as correct/somewhat correct or could not tell whether it was correct or incorrect. Results varied based on participant demographics, including age, gender, and occupation. These findings support the need for data literacy. If Generative AI is to be used in higher education to aid in the learning process, it is imperative to continue teaching critical thinking.
在高等教育中使用生成式人工智能进行教学的早期感知
该项目探讨了学生和教师对 ChatGPT 在高等教育中的应用的看法,以评估这种基于生成式人工智能(Generative AI)的新工具对教学的影响。本项目采用了两个理论框架,包括创新扩散理论(罗杰斯,1962 年)和技术接受模型(戴维斯,1989 年)。380 名参与者完成了在线调查(N = 380)。参与者表示,他们不会使用 ChatGPT 进行抄袭,但相信其他人会。当被要求对 ChatGPT 输出的准确性进行评分时,一半以上的人认为不正确的输出是正确的/有点正确的,或者无法判断它是正确的还是不正确的。结果因参与者的人口统计学特征(包括年龄、性别和职业)而异。这些发现支持了对数据素养的需求。如果要在高等教育中使用生成式人工智能来帮助学习过程,就必须继续教授批判性思维。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信