Effects of foreign direct investment, economic integration, industrialization and economic growth on energy intensity: case of India

IF 1.9 Q2 ECONOMICS
Mustafa Naimoglu, İsmail Kavaz, Ahmed Ihsan Simsek
{"title":"Effects of foreign direct investment, economic integration, industrialization and economic growth on energy intensity: case of India","authors":"Mustafa Naimoglu,&nbsp;İsmail Kavaz,&nbsp;Ahmed Ihsan Simsek","doi":"10.1007/s41685-024-00329-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>India is a developing market economy that comprised over 18% of the global population in 2020 and showed a 1.29% share of world GDP (Gross Domestic Product) in 1990. In addition, 3.20% of global energy consumption belonged to India in 1990. By 2020, India’s share of the world GDP was 3.08%, increasing its GDP by almost 3 times. However, energy usage increased by less than 2 times with a share of 6.25% in the world’s total energy consumption. Therefore, India managed to decrease its energy intensity per capita level by 64.35% in 2020 compared to 1990 by using less energy even with an increased income. In this context, this study investigated the question of how the Indian economy reduced its energy intensity for the period between 1990 and 2020. The impacts of GDP per capita, economic integration, foreign direct investments (FDI) and industrialization on energy intensity were analyzed using annual data from 1990 to 2020. First, the standard Augmented Dickey–Fuller Test (ADF) and Fourier ADF test methods were used to determine stationarity of the series. Then Fourier Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ADL) and Fourier Engle–Granger tests, recently introduced in the literature, were used to examine the cointegration relationships because all of the series were stable after subtracting the first differences. The results indicated a cointegration link between the variables. According to the empirical evidence obtained from FMOLS/CCR (DOLS) analysis, an increase of 1% in economic growth and foreign direct investment over the long run led to a decrease in energy intensity of approximately 1.08%/1.12% (1.14%) and 0.01%/0.001% (0.05%), respectively. Additionally, the results from FMOLS/CCR (DOLS) analysis indicated that a 1% rise in industrialization and trade openness in the long term resulted in an increase in energy intensity of approximately 0.25%/0.13% (0.39%) and 0.15%/0.18% (0.21%), respectively. Finally, fully modified ordinary least squares (FMOLS), Charnes, Cooper and Rhodes Model (CCR), and Stock-Watson Dynamic Ordinary Least Squares (DOLS) estimators were used for short and long-term coefficient estimations. Therefore, we conclude based on these findings that economic growth and foreign capital decrease energy intensity over the long term, while industrialization and economic integration increase energy intensity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36164,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science","volume":"8 1","pages":"333 - 354"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41685-024-00329-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

India is a developing market economy that comprised over 18% of the global population in 2020 and showed a 1.29% share of world GDP (Gross Domestic Product) in 1990. In addition, 3.20% of global energy consumption belonged to India in 1990. By 2020, India’s share of the world GDP was 3.08%, increasing its GDP by almost 3 times. However, energy usage increased by less than 2 times with a share of 6.25% in the world’s total energy consumption. Therefore, India managed to decrease its energy intensity per capita level by 64.35% in 2020 compared to 1990 by using less energy even with an increased income. In this context, this study investigated the question of how the Indian economy reduced its energy intensity for the period between 1990 and 2020. The impacts of GDP per capita, economic integration, foreign direct investments (FDI) and industrialization on energy intensity were analyzed using annual data from 1990 to 2020. First, the standard Augmented Dickey–Fuller Test (ADF) and Fourier ADF test methods were used to determine stationarity of the series. Then Fourier Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ADL) and Fourier Engle–Granger tests, recently introduced in the literature, were used to examine the cointegration relationships because all of the series were stable after subtracting the first differences. The results indicated a cointegration link between the variables. According to the empirical evidence obtained from FMOLS/CCR (DOLS) analysis, an increase of 1% in economic growth and foreign direct investment over the long run led to a decrease in energy intensity of approximately 1.08%/1.12% (1.14%) and 0.01%/0.001% (0.05%), respectively. Additionally, the results from FMOLS/CCR (DOLS) analysis indicated that a 1% rise in industrialization and trade openness in the long term resulted in an increase in energy intensity of approximately 0.25%/0.13% (0.39%) and 0.15%/0.18% (0.21%), respectively. Finally, fully modified ordinary least squares (FMOLS), Charnes, Cooper and Rhodes Model (CCR), and Stock-Watson Dynamic Ordinary Least Squares (DOLS) estimators were used for short and long-term coefficient estimations. Therefore, we conclude based on these findings that economic growth and foreign capital decrease energy intensity over the long term, while industrialization and economic integration increase energy intensity.

外国直接投资、经济一体化、工业化和经济增长对能源强度的影响:印度案例
印度是一个发展中的市场经济国家,2020 年占全球人口的 18% 以上,1990 年占世界 GDP(国内生产总值)的 1.29%。此外,1990 年全球能源消耗的 3.20% 属于印度。到 2020 年,印度占世界 GDP 的 3.08%,GDP 增长了近 3 倍。然而,能源使用量却增长了不到 2 倍,占全球能源总消耗量的 6.25%。因此,印度即使在收入增加的情况下,通过减少能源使用量,也能在 2020 年将人均能源密集度比 1990 年降低 64.35%。在此背景下,本研究探讨了印度经济在 1990 年至 2020 年期间如何降低能源强度的问题。研究利用 1990 年至 2020 年的年度数据分析了人均 GDP、经济一体化、外国直接投资(FDI)和工业化对能源强度的影响。首先,使用标准的增强 Dickey-Fuller 检验(ADF)和傅里叶 ADF 检验方法来确定序列的平稳性。然后,由于所有序列在减去第一次差分后都是稳定的,因此使用了最近在文献中引入的傅里叶自回归分布滞后(ADL)和傅里叶恩格尔-格兰杰检验来检验协整关系。结果表明变量之间存在协整关系。根据 FMOLS/CCR(DOLS)分析得出的经验证据,长期来看,经济增长和外国直接投资每增加 1%,能源强度就会下降约 1.08%/1.12%(1.14%)和 0.01%/0.001%(0.05%)。此外,FMOLS/CCR(DOLS)分析结果表明,工业化和贸易开放度在长期内每增加 1%,能源强度就会分别增加约 0.25%/0.13%(0.39%)和 0.15%/0.18%(0.21%)。最后,我们采用完全修正普通最小二乘法(FMOLS)、Charnes、Cooper 和 Rhodes 模型(CCR)以及 Stock-Watson 动态普通最小二乘法(DOLS)估算短期和长期系数。因此,我们根据这些研究结果得出结论:从长期来看,经济增长和外国资本降低了能源强度,而工业化和经济一体化则提高了能源强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science
Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science expands the frontiers of regional science through the diffusion of intrinsically developed and advanced modern, regional science methodologies throughout the Asia-Pacific region. Articles published in the journal foster progress and development of regional science through the promotion of comprehensive and interdisciplinary academic studies in relationship to research in regional science across the globe. The journal’s scope includes articles dedicated to theoretical economics, positive economics including econometrics and statistical analysis and input–output analysis, CGE, Simulation, applied economics including international economics, regional economics, industrial organization, analysis of governance and institutional issues, law and economics, migration and labor markets, spatial economics, land economics, urban economics, agricultural economics, environmental economics, behavioral economics and spatial analysis with GIS/RS data education economics, sociology including urban sociology, rural sociology, environmental sociology and educational sociology, as well as traffic engineering. The journal provides a unique platform for its research community to further develop, analyze, and resolve urgent regional and urban issues in Asia, and to further refine established research around the world in this multidisciplinary field. The journal invites original articles, proposals, and book reviews.The Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science is a new English-language journal that spun out of Chiikigakukenkyuu, which has a 45-year history of publishing the best Japanese research in regional science in the Japanese language and, more recently and more frequently, in English. The development of regional science as an international discipline has necessitated the need for a new publication in English. The Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science is a publishing vehicle for English-language contributions to the field in Japan, across the complete Asia-Pacific arena, and beyond.Content published in this journal is peer reviewed (Double Blind).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信