Carcinogenic Chemicals in Occupational Settings: A Tool for Comparison and Translation between Different Classification Systems

Hygiene Pub Date : 2024-02-21 DOI:10.3390/hygiene4010007
Carolina Zellino, A. Spinazzè, F. Borghi, D. Campagnolo, G. Fanti, M. Keller, Alessio Carminati, S. Rovelli, Andrea Cattaneo, D. Cavallo
{"title":"Carcinogenic Chemicals in Occupational Settings: A Tool for Comparison and Translation between Different Classification Systems","authors":"Carolina Zellino, A. Spinazzè, F. Borghi, D. Campagnolo, G. Fanti, M. Keller, Alessio Carminati, S. Rovelli, Andrea Cattaneo, D. Cavallo","doi":"10.3390/hygiene4010007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the European Union, Occupational Safety and Health legislation generally refers to European Regulation (CE) n. 1272/2008 to define and classify carcinogens of concern for occupational risk assessment and exposure assessment. In Europe, the current reference is Directive (UE) 2022/431, regarding carcinogen, mutagen, and reprotoxic agent (CMR) exposure. However, at the worldwide level, different classification approaches are used to establish carcinogenicity of substances and it is often difficult to compare the classifications of carcinogenicity (CoCs) proposed by different international bodies. This study aims to investigate a list of carcinogens of concern in occupational settings based on the CLP (Classification Labelling Packaging) CoC and to create a tool that allows a rapid translation–comparison of some international CoCs with the reference one. CoCs proposed by various sources were consulted and used to apply a translation method, to favor an alignment of different CoCs according to a reference. Results outlined that, considering diverse sources, CoCs can result in different classifications of the same chemicals. Overall, this may have implications for the hazard assessment process, which is the base of risk assessment. The proposed tool is expected to help risk assessors in the occupational field when it is needed to have a comparison with different CoC systems.","PeriodicalId":513294,"journal":{"name":"Hygiene","volume":"9 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/hygiene4010007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the European Union, Occupational Safety and Health legislation generally refers to European Regulation (CE) n. 1272/2008 to define and classify carcinogens of concern for occupational risk assessment and exposure assessment. In Europe, the current reference is Directive (UE) 2022/431, regarding carcinogen, mutagen, and reprotoxic agent (CMR) exposure. However, at the worldwide level, different classification approaches are used to establish carcinogenicity of substances and it is often difficult to compare the classifications of carcinogenicity (CoCs) proposed by different international bodies. This study aims to investigate a list of carcinogens of concern in occupational settings based on the CLP (Classification Labelling Packaging) CoC and to create a tool that allows a rapid translation–comparison of some international CoCs with the reference one. CoCs proposed by various sources were consulted and used to apply a translation method, to favor an alignment of different CoCs according to a reference. Results outlined that, considering diverse sources, CoCs can result in different classifications of the same chemicals. Overall, this may have implications for the hazard assessment process, which is the base of risk assessment. The proposed tool is expected to help risk assessors in the occupational field when it is needed to have a comparison with different CoC systems.
职业环境中的致癌化学品:不同分类系统之间的比较和转换工具
在欧洲联盟,职业安全与健康立法一般参照欧洲法规 (CE) n. 1272/2008,以界定和分类职业风险评估和接触评估所关注的致癌物质。欧洲目前参照的是关于致癌物、诱变剂和生殖毒性剂(CMR)接触的指令 (UE) 2022/431。然而,在世界范围内,人们采用不同的分类方法来确定物质的致癌性,而且通常很难比较不同国际机构提出的致癌性分类(CoCs)。本研究旨在根据 CLP(分类标签包装)CoC 调查职业环境中的致癌物清单,并创建一个工具,以便快速翻译比较一些国际 CoC 和参考 CoC。我们参考了各种来源提出的 CoC,并将其用于翻译方法,以便根据参考文献对不同的 CoC 进行比对。结果表明,考虑到不同的来源,CoC 可能会对相同的化学品进行不同的分类。总体而言,这可能会对作为风险评估基础的危害评估过程产生影响。当职业领域的风险评估人员需要与不同的化学品统一分类系统进行比较时,所提议的工具有望为他们提供帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信