A survey-based assessment of attitudes and needs regarding tinnitus healthcare among patients and healthcare professionals in Europe

K. Steinmetzger, Tabea Schiele, Benjamin Boecking, Marios Avraamides, Panagiotis D. Bamidis, Laura Basso, Christian Dobel, S. Gilou, Christos I. Ioannou, Andria Shimi, E. Vellidou, Evangelos Paraskevopoulos, Birgit Mazurek
{"title":"A survey-based assessment of attitudes and needs regarding tinnitus healthcare among patients and healthcare professionals in Europe","authors":"K. Steinmetzger, Tabea Schiele, Benjamin Boecking, Marios Avraamides, Panagiotis D. Bamidis, Laura Basso, Christian Dobel, S. Gilou, Christos I. Ioannou, Andria Shimi, E. Vellidou, Evangelos Paraskevopoulos, Birgit Mazurek","doi":"10.3389/fauot.2024.1347283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite good agreement of national guidelines for the assessment and treatment of tinnitus, there is still substantial variation regarding tinnitus-related healthcare across Europe. In contrast to previous work, which has mainly focussed on the perspective of healthcare professionals, we here report the results of separate web-based surveys conducted with clinicians and researchers as well as tinnitus patients. These surveys were devised to obtain information about their respective attitudes and needs with respect to tinnitus healthcare, and to reveal possible interdisciplinary inconsistencies among clinicians and researchers. We mainly targeted participants from Germany, Cyprus, and Greece, the countries in which the institutions of the researchers involved in this project are based. Results showed, firstly, that the treatment satisfaction of the patients was overall more negative than that of the clinicians and researchers, and that the patients' treatment satisfaction did not depend on the number of different treatments they had received. Secondly, patients as well as clinicians and researchers indicated that they were interested in learning more about a variety of tinnitus-related topics, especially treatment strategies, with no marked differences between clinicians from different professional disciplines. This suggests similar tinnitus-specific educational needs in patients and healthcare professionals.","PeriodicalId":483207,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Audiology and Otology","volume":"58 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Audiology and Otology","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fauot.2024.1347283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite good agreement of national guidelines for the assessment and treatment of tinnitus, there is still substantial variation regarding tinnitus-related healthcare across Europe. In contrast to previous work, which has mainly focussed on the perspective of healthcare professionals, we here report the results of separate web-based surveys conducted with clinicians and researchers as well as tinnitus patients. These surveys were devised to obtain information about their respective attitudes and needs with respect to tinnitus healthcare, and to reveal possible interdisciplinary inconsistencies among clinicians and researchers. We mainly targeted participants from Germany, Cyprus, and Greece, the countries in which the institutions of the researchers involved in this project are based. Results showed, firstly, that the treatment satisfaction of the patients was overall more negative than that of the clinicians and researchers, and that the patients' treatment satisfaction did not depend on the number of different treatments they had received. Secondly, patients as well as clinicians and researchers indicated that they were interested in learning more about a variety of tinnitus-related topics, especially treatment strategies, with no marked differences between clinicians from different professional disciplines. This suggests similar tinnitus-specific educational needs in patients and healthcare professionals.
以调查为基础,评估欧洲患者和医护人员对耳鸣保健的态度和需求
尽管各国在耳鸣的评估和治疗指南方面达成了良好的共识,但欧洲各国在耳鸣相关的医疗保健方面仍存在很大差异。与以往主要关注医疗保健专业人员视角的工作不同,我们在此报告分别对临床医生、研究人员以及耳鸣患者进行网络调查的结果。这些调查旨在了解他们各自对耳鸣医疗保健的态度和需求,并揭示临床医生和研究人员之间可能存在的跨学科不一致性。我们的调查对象主要来自德国、塞浦路斯和希腊,这三个国家是本项目研究人员所在机构的所在地。结果表明,首先,患者对治疗的满意度总体上比临床医生和研究人员的满意度更消极,而且患者对治疗的满意度与他们接受的不同治疗的次数无关。其次,患者、临床医生和研究人员都表示有兴趣了解更多与耳鸣相关的知识,尤其是治疗策略,不同专业领域的临床医生之间没有明显差异。这表明患者和医护人员对耳鸣特定教育的需求相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信