Erin N Macke, Landon Richard Jones, Raymond Iglay, Jared A Elmore
{"title":"Drone noise differs by flight maneuver and model: implications for animal surveys","authors":"Erin N Macke, Landon Richard Jones, Raymond Iglay, Jared A Elmore","doi":"10.1139/dsa-2023-0054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drones are becoming a common tool for animal monitoring; however, sound emitted from drones may disturb animals and bias survey results. Understanding noise levels produced by different flight maneuvers, altitudes [i.e., above ground level (AGL)], and drone models could mitigate animal disturbance during surveys. We measured maximum sound (dB) emitted during three flight maneuvers (hovering, flyover, turning) among eight AGLs (15-120 m) and two vertical maneuvers (ascending, descending) for 4 commercially available quadcopter drone models (DJI Matrice 300, Matrice 200, Phantom 3, and Autel Evo II), accounting for wind speed and comparing to ambient (background) noise. Ascending, descending, and hovering produced more noise compared to flyover and turning maneuvers. One large drone (Matrice 200, 4.7 kg) produced more noise than the two smaller drones (Evo II, 1.2 kg and Phantom 3, 1.1 kg). However, the largest drone (Matrice 300, 6.4 kg) produced noise similar to smaller models and was the quietest among all models from 75–120 m AGL, providing potential size advantages with less noise disturbance. Our results indicate that flights consisting of flyover and turning maneuvers likely cause less noise disturbance than surveys with prolonged hovering over animals.","PeriodicalId":202289,"journal":{"name":"Drone Systems and Applications","volume":"37 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drone Systems and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/dsa-2023-0054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Drones are becoming a common tool for animal monitoring; however, sound emitted from drones may disturb animals and bias survey results. Understanding noise levels produced by different flight maneuvers, altitudes [i.e., above ground level (AGL)], and drone models could mitigate animal disturbance during surveys. We measured maximum sound (dB) emitted during three flight maneuvers (hovering, flyover, turning) among eight AGLs (15-120 m) and two vertical maneuvers (ascending, descending) for 4 commercially available quadcopter drone models (DJI Matrice 300, Matrice 200, Phantom 3, and Autel Evo II), accounting for wind speed and comparing to ambient (background) noise. Ascending, descending, and hovering produced more noise compared to flyover and turning maneuvers. One large drone (Matrice 200, 4.7 kg) produced more noise than the two smaller drones (Evo II, 1.2 kg and Phantom 3, 1.1 kg). However, the largest drone (Matrice 300, 6.4 kg) produced noise similar to smaller models and was the quietest among all models from 75–120 m AGL, providing potential size advantages with less noise disturbance. Our results indicate that flights consisting of flyover and turning maneuvers likely cause less noise disturbance than surveys with prolonged hovering over animals.