A bibliometric and scientometric analysis-based review of environmental health and safety research in the construction industry

Juliet Owusu-Boadi, Ernest Kissi, Ivy Maame Abu, Cecilia Dapaah Owusu, Bernard Baiden, Caleb Debrah
{"title":"A bibliometric and scientometric analysis-based review of environmental health and safety research in the construction industry","authors":"Juliet Owusu-Boadi, Ernest Kissi, Ivy Maame Abu, Cecilia Dapaah Owusu, Bernard Baiden, Caleb Debrah","doi":"10.1108/jedt-09-2023-0423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe construction business is widely recognised for its inherent complexity and dynamic nature, which stems from the nature of the job involved. The industry is often regarded as one of the most challenging industries globally in terms of implementing environmental, health and safety (EHS) practices. However, in the absence of EHS, the construction industry cannot be considered sustainable. Therefore, this study aims to identify the trends, knowledge gaps and implications of EHS research to enhance construction activities and knowledge.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe study adopted a science mapping approach involving bibliometric and scientometric analysis of 407 construction EHS publications from the Scopus database with the VOSviewer software. The study is based on journal articles from the Scopus database without restriction to any time range.\n\n\nFindings\nThe main focus of construction EHS research identified in the study includes sustainability-related studies, risk-related, environmental issues, EHS management, integrated management systems studies, health and safety related and EHS in the construction process. Some emerging areas also identified include productivity, design, culture, social sustainability and machine learning. The most influential and productive publication sources, countries/regions and EHS publications with the highest impact were also determined.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nDocuments published in the Scopus database were considered for analysis because of the wider coverage of the database. Journal articles written in English language represent the inclusion criteria, whereas other documents were excluded from the analysis. The study also limited the search to articles with the engineering subject area.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe research findings will enlighten stakeholders and practitioners on the focal knowledge areas in the EHS research domain, which are vital for enhancing EHS in the industry.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this review-based study is the first attempt to internationally conduct a science mapping on extant literature in the EHS research domain through bibliometric and scientometric assessments.\n","PeriodicalId":514531,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology","volume":"43 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jedt-09-2023-0423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The construction business is widely recognised for its inherent complexity and dynamic nature, which stems from the nature of the job involved. The industry is often regarded as one of the most challenging industries globally in terms of implementing environmental, health and safety (EHS) practices. However, in the absence of EHS, the construction industry cannot be considered sustainable. Therefore, this study aims to identify the trends, knowledge gaps and implications of EHS research to enhance construction activities and knowledge. Design/methodology/approach The study adopted a science mapping approach involving bibliometric and scientometric analysis of 407 construction EHS publications from the Scopus database with the VOSviewer software. The study is based on journal articles from the Scopus database without restriction to any time range. Findings The main focus of construction EHS research identified in the study includes sustainability-related studies, risk-related, environmental issues, EHS management, integrated management systems studies, health and safety related and EHS in the construction process. Some emerging areas also identified include productivity, design, culture, social sustainability and machine learning. The most influential and productive publication sources, countries/regions and EHS publications with the highest impact were also determined. Research limitations/implications Documents published in the Scopus database were considered for analysis because of the wider coverage of the database. Journal articles written in English language represent the inclusion criteria, whereas other documents were excluded from the analysis. The study also limited the search to articles with the engineering subject area. Practical implications The research findings will enlighten stakeholders and practitioners on the focal knowledge areas in the EHS research domain, which are vital for enhancing EHS in the industry. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this review-based study is the first attempt to internationally conduct a science mapping on extant literature in the EHS research domain through bibliometric and scientometric assessments.
基于文献计量和科学计量分析的建筑业环境健康与安全研究综述
目的建筑业因其固有的复杂性和动态性而被广泛认可,这源于其工作性质。在实施环境、健康和安全(EHS)实践方面,该行业通常被视为全球最具挑战性的行业之一。然而,如果没有 EHS,建筑行业就不能被视为可持续发展的行业。因此,本研究旨在确定 EHS 研究的趋势、知识差距和影响,以增强建筑活动和知识。本研究采用科学绘图法,利用 VOSviewer 软件对 Scopus 数据库中的 407 篇建筑 EHS 出版物进行文献计量和科学计量分析。研究结果本研究确定的建筑 EHS 研究重点包括可持续性相关研究、风险相关研究、环境问题研究、EHS 管理研究、综合管理系统研究、健康与安全相关研究以及施工过程中的 EHS 研究。一些新兴领域还包括生产力、设计、文化、社会可持续性和机器学习。此外,还确定了最有影响力和最有成果的出版物来源、国家/地区以及影响最大的 EHS 出版物。研究局限性/影响由于 Scopus 数据库的覆盖面较广,因此考虑对该数据库中发表的文献进行分析。以英语撰写的期刊论文代表了纳入标准,而其他文献则被排除在分析之外。实践意义研究结果将启发利益相关者和从业人员了解 EHS 研究领域的重点知识领域,这对提高行业的 EHS 至关重要。原创性/价值据作者所知,这项基于综述的研究是国际上首次尝试通过文献计量学和科学计量学评估对 EHS 研究领域的现有文献进行科学绘图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信