Comparative analysis of the protein content and nutritional label of whey protein, plant-based, and animal proteins supplements

Lívia Velloso Fabris, Leonardo Moreira dos Santos, Giuseppe Potrick Stefani
{"title":"Comparative analysis of the protein content and nutritional label of whey protein, plant-based, and animal proteins supplements","authors":"Lívia Velloso Fabris, Leonardo Moreira dos Santos, Giuseppe Potrick Stefani","doi":"10.21527/2176-7114.2024.48.14497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The consumption of protein supplements is increasingly part of the everyday life of adults in general and is associated with a healthier lifestyle. However, a constant lack of commitment to the quality of these products by companies poses risks to consumers’ health. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the protein content and compare it with the nutrition label of different protein supplements. This is an analytical original investigation. It was verified whether the food supplements comply with the label presented through food analysis (Kjeldahl method, ash content and moisture percentage) of the composition of various national and international brands (n=51). A total of 51 different protein-based supplements sold in Brazil were analyzed. The results showed that the protein values advertised on the nutritional label are similar to what the product has (P value > 0,05) and are within the 20% tolerance limit according to the current law. Also, there are similarities between different types of products (P value > 0,05) regarding their ash and water content. In conclusion, the nutrition facts of protein supplements reflect the reality of the bran of these products.","PeriodicalId":267088,"journal":{"name":"Revista Contexto & Saúde","volume":"22 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Contexto & Saúde","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21527/2176-7114.2024.48.14497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The consumption of protein supplements is increasingly part of the everyday life of adults in general and is associated with a healthier lifestyle. However, a constant lack of commitment to the quality of these products by companies poses risks to consumers’ health. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the protein content and compare it with the nutrition label of different protein supplements. This is an analytical original investigation. It was verified whether the food supplements comply with the label presented through food analysis (Kjeldahl method, ash content and moisture percentage) of the composition of various national and international brands (n=51). A total of 51 different protein-based supplements sold in Brazil were analyzed. The results showed that the protein values advertised on the nutritional label are similar to what the product has (P value > 0,05) and are within the 20% tolerance limit according to the current law. Also, there are similarities between different types of products (P value > 0,05) regarding their ash and water content. In conclusion, the nutrition facts of protein supplements reflect the reality of the bran of these products.
乳清蛋白、植物蛋白和动物蛋白补充剂的蛋白质含量和营养标签比较分析
蛋白质补充剂越来越多地成为成年人日常生活的一部分,并与更健康的生活方式联系在一起。然而,企业对这些产品的质量始终缺乏承诺,给消费者的健康带来了风险。因此,本研究旨在分析蛋白质含量,并将其与不同蛋白质补充剂的营养标签进行比较。这是一项原创性的分析调查。通过对各种国内和国际品牌(n=51)的成分进行食品分析(凯氏定氮法、灰分含量和水分百分比),验证食品补充剂是否符合标签要求。共分析了 51 种在巴西销售的不同蛋白质补充剂。结果显示,营养标签上宣传的蛋白质值与产品的蛋白质值相似(P 值 > 0,05),并且在现行法律规定的 20% 容忍限度内。此外,不同类型产品的灰分和水分含量也有相似之处(P 值 > 0,05)。总之,蛋白质补充剂的营养成分反映了这些产品糠麸的实际情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信