Genotyping of UGT1A1 and DPYD polymorphisms in patients with colorectal cancer. A review

Q4 Medicine
NN Timoshkina, N. A. Petrusenko, P. N. Gabrichidze, Maria A. Cherkess, T. F. Pushkareva, Dmitry A. Savchenko
{"title":"Genotyping of UGT1A1 and DPYD polymorphisms in patients with colorectal cancer. A review","authors":"NN Timoshkina, N. A. Petrusenko, P. N. Gabrichidze, Maria A. Cherkess, T. F. Pushkareva, Dmitry A. Savchenko","doi":"10.26442/18151434.2023.4.202514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main treatment regimen for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer is still cycle-based chemotherapy with fluoropyridines combined with oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan. The activity of these chemotherapeutic agents depends on a predominant specific metabolism pathway. Therefore, the genetic features of the patient become important as a prognostic factor for the occurrence and severity of adverse events during therapy. The review addresses current views about the mechanisms of toxic activity of irinotecan and fluoropyrimidines, analyzes the results of pharmacogenotyping of UGT1A1 and DPYD polymorphisms, and published studies assessing the relationship between genetic variants of these genes and the safety of chemotherapy. A significant role of the population component is noted both in the distribution of gene allele frequencies and in their phenotypic expression. For some polymorphisms of the DPYD gene, dose-dependent associations with the toxicity of 5-fluorouracil have been established. Nevertheless, they determine only 1–8% of cases out of 40–60% of patients with adverse events and DPD protein deficiency associated with other enzyme activity reduction mechanisms. The pharmacological significance of UGT1A1 genetic variations is associated with toxicity prediction and helps allocate patients for more effective high-dose irinotecan therapy. Data is presented on the pharmacogenotyping of these markers to establish the dose of drugs in various national guidelines. Currently, the heterogeneity of the available pharmacogenetic data leaves open the question of determining the most appropriate dosing strategies for irinotecan and fluoropyrimidines. The widespread introduction of UGT1A1 and DPYD genotyping into clinical practice balances the economic feasibility and predictive value of biomarkers. As pharmacogenomics evolves rapidly, more robust research would overcome existing hurdles and facilitate personalized drug dosage decisions.","PeriodicalId":16401,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern Oncology","volume":"31 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Modern Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26442/18151434.2023.4.202514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main treatment regimen for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer is still cycle-based chemotherapy with fluoropyridines combined with oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan. The activity of these chemotherapeutic agents depends on a predominant specific metabolism pathway. Therefore, the genetic features of the patient become important as a prognostic factor for the occurrence and severity of adverse events during therapy. The review addresses current views about the mechanisms of toxic activity of irinotecan and fluoropyrimidines, analyzes the results of pharmacogenotyping of UGT1A1 and DPYD polymorphisms, and published studies assessing the relationship between genetic variants of these genes and the safety of chemotherapy. A significant role of the population component is noted both in the distribution of gene allele frequencies and in their phenotypic expression. For some polymorphisms of the DPYD gene, dose-dependent associations with the toxicity of 5-fluorouracil have been established. Nevertheless, they determine only 1–8% of cases out of 40–60% of patients with adverse events and DPD protein deficiency associated with other enzyme activity reduction mechanisms. The pharmacological significance of UGT1A1 genetic variations is associated with toxicity prediction and helps allocate patients for more effective high-dose irinotecan therapy. Data is presented on the pharmacogenotyping of these markers to establish the dose of drugs in various national guidelines. Currently, the heterogeneity of the available pharmacogenetic data leaves open the question of determining the most appropriate dosing strategies for irinotecan and fluoropyrimidines. The widespread introduction of UGT1A1 and DPYD genotyping into clinical practice balances the economic feasibility and predictive value of biomarkers. As pharmacogenomics evolves rapidly, more robust research would overcome existing hurdles and facilitate personalized drug dosage decisions.
结直肠癌患者 UGT1A1 和 DPYD 多态性基因分型。综述
转移性结直肠癌患者的主要治疗方案仍然是氟吡啶类药物联合奥沙利铂和/或伊立替康的周期性化疗。这些化疗药物的活性取决于主要的特定代谢途径。因此,患者的遗传特征成为治疗期间不良反应发生和严重程度的重要预后因素。本综述探讨了目前关于伊立替康和氟嘧啶类药物毒性活动机制的观点,分析了 UGT1A1 和 DPYD 多态性的药物基因分型结果,以及已发表的评估这些基因的遗传变异与化疗安全性之间关系的研究。在基因等位基因频率的分布及其表型表达中,人群因素都发挥了重要作用。DPYD 基因的某些多态性与 5 氟尿嘧啶的毒性存在剂量依赖关系。尽管如此,在 40-60% 的不良事件和与其他酶活性降低机制相关的 DPD 蛋白缺乏症患者中,它们仅占 1-8% 的病例。UGT1A1 基因变异的药理学意义与毒性预测有关,有助于为患者分配更有效的大剂量伊立替康疗法。各种国家指南中都介绍了通过对这些标记物进行药物基因分型来确定药物剂量的数据。目前,由于现有药物基因数据的异质性,在确定伊立替康和氟嘧啶类药物最合适的剂量策略方面仍存在问题。在临床实践中广泛采用 UGT1A1 和 DPYD 基因分型技术可以在生物标志物的经济可行性和预测价值之间取得平衡。随着药物基因组学的快速发展,更有力的研究将克服现有障碍,促进个性化药物剂量决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Modern Oncology
Journal of Modern Oncology Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信