Efficacy and Safety of High-power Short-duration Radio Frequency Ablation in the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-analysis of Prospective Study

Guohua Ma, Weijiang Zhang
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of High-power Short-duration Radio Frequency Ablation in the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-analysis of Prospective Study","authors":"Guohua Ma, Weijiang Zhang","doi":"10.59958/hsf.6853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Radiofrequency ablation is a critical therapeutic method used in the management of atrial fibrillation (AF). This study systematically evaluates the effectiveness and safety of two catheter radio frequency ablation approaches: high-power short-duration (HPSD) and traditional low-power long-duration (LPLD), in treating AF. Methods: Four databases were searched for prospective studies (eight cohort studies and three randomised controlled trials) that evaluated the effect of HPSD treatment on AF recurrence, occurrence rate of complications and procedural time in patients with AF from the establishment of the databases to March 2023. We utilised RevMan 5.20 and Stata 11.0 statistical software to conduct a meta-analysis, and publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger's test. The effect estimates were synthesised as relative risks (RRs) or standardised mean differences (SMDs) along with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: A total of 536 relevant studies were retrieved, and 11 prospective studies were collected. The combined value of the estimated effect of HPSD versus LPLD treatment on AF recurrence in patients with AF had an RR of 0.59 (95% CI: 0.45–0.78; p < 0.001), the effects of HPSD versus LPLD treatment on procedural time in patients with AF had an SMD of –1.17 (95% CI: –1.56– –0.77; p < 0.001), and the effect of HPSD versus LPLD treatment on oesophageal thermal injury in patients with AF had an RR of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.22–3.28; p = 0.80). Notably, the estimated combined effects of HPSD and LPLD on other major complications (steam pop) in patients with AF had an RR of 0.57 (95% CI: 0.22–1.47; p = 0.24). Conclusions: HPSD is more effective than traditional LPLD and has a lower AF recurrence rate after surgery. Meanwhile, HPSD treatment can improve surgical efficiency and has a shorter procedural time than LPLD treatment.","PeriodicalId":503802,"journal":{"name":"The Heart Surgery Forum","volume":"15 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Heart Surgery Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59958/hsf.6853","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Radiofrequency ablation is a critical therapeutic method used in the management of atrial fibrillation (AF). This study systematically evaluates the effectiveness and safety of two catheter radio frequency ablation approaches: high-power short-duration (HPSD) and traditional low-power long-duration (LPLD), in treating AF. Methods: Four databases were searched for prospective studies (eight cohort studies and three randomised controlled trials) that evaluated the effect of HPSD treatment on AF recurrence, occurrence rate of complications and procedural time in patients with AF from the establishment of the databases to March 2023. We utilised RevMan 5.20 and Stata 11.0 statistical software to conduct a meta-analysis, and publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger's test. The effect estimates were synthesised as relative risks (RRs) or standardised mean differences (SMDs) along with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: A total of 536 relevant studies were retrieved, and 11 prospective studies were collected. The combined value of the estimated effect of HPSD versus LPLD treatment on AF recurrence in patients with AF had an RR of 0.59 (95% CI: 0.45–0.78; p < 0.001), the effects of HPSD versus LPLD treatment on procedural time in patients with AF had an SMD of –1.17 (95% CI: –1.56– –0.77; p < 0.001), and the effect of HPSD versus LPLD treatment on oesophageal thermal injury in patients with AF had an RR of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.22–3.28; p = 0.80). Notably, the estimated combined effects of HPSD and LPLD on other major complications (steam pop) in patients with AF had an RR of 0.57 (95% CI: 0.22–1.47; p = 0.24). Conclusions: HPSD is more effective than traditional LPLD and has a lower AF recurrence rate after surgery. Meanwhile, HPSD treatment can improve surgical efficiency and has a shorter procedural time than LPLD treatment.
高功率短时射频消融治疗心房颤动的有效性和安全性:前瞻性研究的元分析
背景:射频消融是治疗心房颤动(房颤)的重要治疗方法。本研究系统评估了两种导管射频消融方法:高功率短时程(HPSD)和传统的低功率长时程(LPLD)治疗房颤的有效性和安全性。方法:在四个数据库中检索了自数据库建立至 2023 年 3 月期间评估 HPSD 治疗对房颤复发、并发症发生率和房颤患者手术时间影响的前瞻性研究(八项队列研究和三项随机对照试验)。我们使用RevMan 5.20和Stata 11.0统计软件进行了荟萃分析,并使用漏斗图和Egger检验评估了发表偏倚。效应估计值以相对风险 (RR) 或标准化平均差 (SMD) 及其相应的 95% 置信区间 (CI) 的形式进行综合。研究结果共检索到 536 项相关研究,收集到 11 项前瞻性研究。HPSD与LPLD治疗对心房颤动患者心房颤动复发的影响的综合估计值的RR为0.59 (95% CI: 0.45-0.78; p < 0.001),HPSD与LPLD治疗对心房颤动患者手术时间的影响的SMD为-1.17 (95% CI: -1.56- -0.77; p < 0.001),HPSD与LPLD治疗对房颤患者食道热损伤的影响的RR为0.84 (95% CI: 0.22-3.28; p = 0.80)。值得注意的是,HPSD和LPLD对心房颤动患者其他主要并发症(蒸汽爆裂)的综合影响估计RR为0.57(95% CI:0.22-1.47;P = 0.24)。结论HPSD比传统的LPLD更有效,术后房颤复发率更低。同时,与 LPLD 治疗相比,HPSD 治疗可提高手术效率,缩短手术时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信