Consistency of the inverse scattering imaging condition, the energy norm imaging condition and the impedance kernel in acoustic and elastic reverse-time migration
{"title":"Consistency of the inverse scattering imaging condition, the energy norm imaging condition and the impedance kernel in acoustic and elastic reverse-time migration","authors":"Pengfei Wang, Jidong Yang, Jianping Huang, Jiaxing Sun, Chong Zhao","doi":"10.1093/jge/gxae022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this work, we draw connections between the imaging conditions using the impedance kernel, the inverse scattering imaging condition, and the energy norm imaging condition in acoustic and elastic reverse-time migration (RTM). Traditional RTM often introduces large low-wavenumber artifacts that degrade image quality in intricate geological structures with large velocity variations. In practice, the Laplacian filter is commonly used to remove these low-wavenumber artifacts, but it changes the image wavenumber spectrum. The advanced imaging conditions of the inverse scattering, the energy norm, and the impedance kernel can effectively remove the low-wavenumber artifacts while not changing the wavenumber spectrum. This study aims to build a connection between these three types of imaging conditions by conducting detailed analysis in the wavenumber domain for acoustic and elastic RTMs. We find that they are exactly the same except for the varying weights of the source-receiver wavefield cross-correlation. All three imaging conditions can generate clear RTM images that are not affected by low-wavenumber artifacts. Numerical examples for a simple model, Sigsbee 2a, and BP models verify the consistency of these three imaging conditions and show their advantage over conventional simple zero-lag cross-correlation imaging conditions. This is important for improving the quality and reliability of seismic imaging technology.","PeriodicalId":54820,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysics and Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysics and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jge/gxae022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this work, we draw connections between the imaging conditions using the impedance kernel, the inverse scattering imaging condition, and the energy norm imaging condition in acoustic and elastic reverse-time migration (RTM). Traditional RTM often introduces large low-wavenumber artifacts that degrade image quality in intricate geological structures with large velocity variations. In practice, the Laplacian filter is commonly used to remove these low-wavenumber artifacts, but it changes the image wavenumber spectrum. The advanced imaging conditions of the inverse scattering, the energy norm, and the impedance kernel can effectively remove the low-wavenumber artifacts while not changing the wavenumber spectrum. This study aims to build a connection between these three types of imaging conditions by conducting detailed analysis in the wavenumber domain for acoustic and elastic RTMs. We find that they are exactly the same except for the varying weights of the source-receiver wavefield cross-correlation. All three imaging conditions can generate clear RTM images that are not affected by low-wavenumber artifacts. Numerical examples for a simple model, Sigsbee 2a, and BP models verify the consistency of these three imaging conditions and show their advantage over conventional simple zero-lag cross-correlation imaging conditions. This is important for improving the quality and reliability of seismic imaging technology.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Geophysics and Engineering aims to promote research and developments in geophysics and related areas of engineering. It has a predominantly applied science and engineering focus, but solicits and accepts high-quality contributions in all earth-physics disciplines, including geodynamics, natural and controlled-source seismology, oil, gas and mineral exploration, petrophysics and reservoir geophysics. The journal covers those aspects of engineering that are closely related to geophysics, or on the targets and problems that geophysics addresses. Typically, this is engineering focused on the subsurface, particularly petroleum engineering, rock mechanics, geophysical software engineering, drilling technology, remote sensing, instrumentation and sensor design.