Mapping English language proficiency test scores of lecturers onto the common European framework level

I. Pane, Kurnia Hendra Putra, Puan Suri Mira Annisa Sembiring
{"title":"Mapping English language proficiency test scores of lecturers onto the common European framework level","authors":"I. Pane, Kurnia Hendra Putra, Puan Suri Mira Annisa Sembiring","doi":"10.33369/jwacana.v22i1.32764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was conducted to display the lecturer’s English language proficiency test scores at one of the state universities in Indonesia. The research applied descriptive design by quantitative approach. The sample is the lecturers of the English and non-English departments at one of the state universities in Indonesia. The instrument of the research was English language proficiency test of TOEFL ITP. Descriptive statistics was used as data analysis technique, mean and percentage. The result of this research disclosed that 86% of the lecturers are in the level of B1 of CEFR which achieved the targeted score of English competences certification file requirements of certified lecturer and 3.92% of the lecturers are in the A2 level of CEFR. The researchers discovered that the most difficult language skill of the test is in the structure and written expression section where 4 % of the lecturers are in the A2 CEFR level. Then it is also revealed that the lecturers got the lowest scaled score in the structure and written expression section, which was 37. From all parts of the test, none of the lecturers achieved C1 level in the structure and written expression. This is implied that the lecturers have problems in their writing skills and need to improve their grammatical skills to be able to write correct sentence structure in standard academic English.","PeriodicalId":309552,"journal":{"name":"Wacana: Jurnal Penelitian Bahasa, Sastra dan Pengajaran","volume":"26 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wacana: Jurnal Penelitian Bahasa, Sastra dan Pengajaran","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33369/jwacana.v22i1.32764","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was conducted to display the lecturer’s English language proficiency test scores at one of the state universities in Indonesia. The research applied descriptive design by quantitative approach. The sample is the lecturers of the English and non-English departments at one of the state universities in Indonesia. The instrument of the research was English language proficiency test of TOEFL ITP. Descriptive statistics was used as data analysis technique, mean and percentage. The result of this research disclosed that 86% of the lecturers are in the level of B1 of CEFR which achieved the targeted score of English competences certification file requirements of certified lecturer and 3.92% of the lecturers are in the A2 level of CEFR. The researchers discovered that the most difficult language skill of the test is in the structure and written expression section where 4 % of the lecturers are in the A2 CEFR level. Then it is also revealed that the lecturers got the lowest scaled score in the structure and written expression section, which was 37. From all parts of the test, none of the lecturers achieved C1 level in the structure and written expression. This is implied that the lecturers have problems in their writing skills and need to improve their grammatical skills to be able to write correct sentence structure in standard academic English.
将讲师的英语语言能力测试分数映射到欧洲共同框架水平上
本研究旨在了解印度尼西亚一所国立大学讲师的英语水平测试成绩。本研究采用定量方法进行描述性设计。样本为印度尼西亚一所国立大学英语系和非英语系的讲师。研究工具为 TOEFL ITP 英语语言能力测试。数据分析采用描述性统计、平均值和百分比。研究结果显示,86% 的讲师达到了 CEFR B1 水平,达到了英语能力认证文件要求的目标分数;3.92% 的讲师达到了 CEFR A2 水平。研究人员发现,测试中最难的语言技能是结构和书面表达部分,4%的讲师处于 CEFR A2 水平。研究还发现,讲师们在结构和书面表达部分的得分最低,仅为 37 分。在测试的所有部分中,没有一位讲师在结构和书面表达方面达到 C1 水平。这意味着讲师们在写作技巧方面存在问题,需要提高语法技能,才能用标准学术英语写出正确的句子结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信