Cattle tick-borne pathogens sharing the same vectors in Benin and Burkina Faso: variations in prevalence and coinfection patterns

A. Biguezoton, S. Adehan, H. Adakal, Honorine Badolo, Mamadou Toure, Sébastien Zoungrana, S. Farougou, Christine Chevillon
{"title":"Cattle tick-borne pathogens sharing the same vectors in Benin and Burkina Faso: variations in prevalence and coinfection patterns","authors":"A. Biguezoton, S. Adehan, H. Adakal, Honorine Badolo, Mamadou Toure, Sébastien Zoungrana, S. Farougou, Christine Chevillon","doi":"10.4314/ijbcs.v17i7.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding interactions between pathogens at the level of the individual host and the population in West Africa, may have  noteworthy implications for predictions of diseases emergence and disease control programmes. Hence, the current study was aimed at  investigating the interactions between Anaplasma marginale, Babesia bigemina and B. bovis in West African cattle. Twelve sentinel steers  in each of the eight selected herds were randomly chosen to perform a one-year-long survey designed to monthly collect blood  sample and to diagnose possible infections of the steers. This allowed identifying A. marginale as the most prevalent pathogen across the  three surveyed regions (range: 0.60-1), followed by B. bigemina (0.24-0.85) and B. bovis (0.10-0.64); the same ranking order of the  tick-borne pathogens was observed when considering the apparent duration of cattle infection. Regarding interaction patterns, mainly  avoidance was revealed between A. marginale and B. bigemina and between B. bigemina and B. bovis. Such negative interaction seemed  to be beneficial to the West African cattle surveyed, helping them to escape from babesiosis caused by B. bovis. Altogether, studied Boophilus tick-borne pathogens negatively interact within cattle in Benin and Burkina Faso. This pattern raises new questions regarding  the underlying mechanisms and potential consequences.    ","PeriodicalId":13808,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences","volume":"18 1‐2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v17i7.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding interactions between pathogens at the level of the individual host and the population in West Africa, may have  noteworthy implications for predictions of diseases emergence and disease control programmes. Hence, the current study was aimed at  investigating the interactions between Anaplasma marginale, Babesia bigemina and B. bovis in West African cattle. Twelve sentinel steers  in each of the eight selected herds were randomly chosen to perform a one-year-long survey designed to monthly collect blood  sample and to diagnose possible infections of the steers. This allowed identifying A. marginale as the most prevalent pathogen across the  three surveyed regions (range: 0.60-1), followed by B. bigemina (0.24-0.85) and B. bovis (0.10-0.64); the same ranking order of the  tick-borne pathogens was observed when considering the apparent duration of cattle infection. Regarding interaction patterns, mainly  avoidance was revealed between A. marginale and B. bigemina and between B. bigemina and B. bovis. Such negative interaction seemed  to be beneficial to the West African cattle surveyed, helping them to escape from babesiosis caused by B. bovis. Altogether, studied Boophilus tick-borne pathogens negatively interact within cattle in Benin and Burkina Faso. This pattern raises new questions regarding  the underlying mechanisms and potential consequences.    
贝宁和布基纳法索牛蜱传播的病原体有相同的传播媒介:流行率和共同感染模式的变化
在西非,了解病原体在宿主个体和种群水平上的相互作用,可能对预测疾病的出现和疾病控制计划具有重要意义。因此,本研究旨在调查西非牛群中的边缘疟原虫、大肠巴贝西亚原虫和牛海绵状芽孢杆菌之间的相互作用。在选定的八个牛群中,每个牛群随机选取 12 头定点母牛,进行为期一年的调查,旨在每月采集血样并诊断母牛可能受到的感染。调查结果表明,在所调查的三个地区中,A. marginale 是最流行的病原体(范围:0.60-1),其次是 B. bigemina(0.24-0.85)和 B. bovis(0.10-0.64);在考虑牛感染的明显持续时间时,也观察到了相同的蜱媒病原体排名顺序。在交互作用模式方面,发现边缘蜱(A. marginale)和大蜱(B. bigemina)之间以及大蜱(B. bigemina)和牛蜱(B. bovis)之间的交互作用主要是回避。这种消极的相互作用似乎对被调查的西非牛有益,有助于它们摆脱牛巴贝斯虫引起的巴贝斯虫病。总之,所研究的嗜褐蜱病原体在贝宁和布基纳法索的牛群中产生了负面作用。这种模式提出了有关潜在机制和潜在后果的新问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信