Colonial necropolitics in responding to gender-based violence amidst cascading disasters in Puerto Rico

Waleska Sanabria León, M. Gabriela Torres
{"title":"Colonial necropolitics in responding to gender-based violence amidst cascading disasters in Puerto Rico","authors":"Waleska Sanabria León,&nbsp;M. Gabriela Torres","doi":"10.1002/fea2.12136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article analyzes how the practice of cascading disaster responses and the relative erasure of increasing cases of gender-based violence (GBV), including feminicidio, or feminicide, by the government in Puerto Rico evidence the structural and regularly reproduced vulnerability of marginalized populations. Drawn from fieldwork in southwestern Puerto Rico between 2019 and 2020, this essay juxtaposes the lived experience of frontline GBV service providers with the relative absence of GBV from the public record until 2022. For activists and scholars, the prevalence of GBV and its relative exclusion from state discourse and records is rooted in ideological, cultural, and operational concerns: operationally, GBV is too often excluded from planned disaster response. Culturally, state-supplied statistics on GBV minimized and otherwise naturalized GBV into a cultural norm or reality-to-be-expected. Ideologically, the exclusion of GBV is also tied to the colonial relationship between Puerto Rico and the United States. We argue that GBV and its relative exclusion from the public record sustains high levels of violence that have already fueled notable public protest and the constrained working conditions of GBV frontline service providers. The article's focus on frontline worker experiences highlights their important role at the forefront of decision-making on how to mitigate GBV during and in the wake of cascading disasters.</p>","PeriodicalId":73022,"journal":{"name":"Feminist anthropology","volume":"5 1","pages":"13-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fea2.12136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article analyzes how the practice of cascading disaster responses and the relative erasure of increasing cases of gender-based violence (GBV), including feminicidio, or feminicide, by the government in Puerto Rico evidence the structural and regularly reproduced vulnerability of marginalized populations. Drawn from fieldwork in southwestern Puerto Rico between 2019 and 2020, this essay juxtaposes the lived experience of frontline GBV service providers with the relative absence of GBV from the public record until 2022. For activists and scholars, the prevalence of GBV and its relative exclusion from state discourse and records is rooted in ideological, cultural, and operational concerns: operationally, GBV is too often excluded from planned disaster response. Culturally, state-supplied statistics on GBV minimized and otherwise naturalized GBV into a cultural norm or reality-to-be-expected. Ideologically, the exclusion of GBV is also tied to the colonial relationship between Puerto Rico and the United States. We argue that GBV and its relative exclusion from the public record sustains high levels of violence that have already fueled notable public protest and the constrained working conditions of GBV frontline service providers. The article's focus on frontline worker experiences highlights their important role at the forefront of decision-making on how to mitigate GBV during and in the wake of cascading disasters.

在波多黎各连环灾难中应对性别暴力的殖民地亡灵政治学
本文分析了波多黎各政府级联式灾害响应的做法和对日益增多的性别暴力(GBV)案件(包括女性暴力(feminicidio)或女性被杀案件)的相对抹杀,如何证明了边缘化人群的结构性和定期再现的脆弱性。本文取材于 2019 年至 2020 年期间在波多黎各西南部进行的实地调查,将基于性别的暴力一线服务提供者的生活经验与 2022 年之前公共记录中相对缺失的基于性别的暴力并列。对于活动家和学者来说,性别暴力的普遍性及其在国家话语和记录中的相对缺失植根于意识形态、文化和操作方面的担忧:在操作方面,性别暴力往往被排除在计划的灾难响应之外。在文化上,国家提供的关于基于性别的暴力的统计数据将基于性别的暴力最小化或自然化,使其成为一种文化规范或可以预期的现实。在意识形态上,将基于性别的暴力排除在外也与波多黎各和美国之间的殖民关系有关。我们认为,基于性别的暴力及其相对被排除在公共记录之外的情况使暴力程度居高不下,这已经引发了显著的公众抗议,并使基于性别的暴力一线服务提供者的工作条件受到限制。文章对一线工作者经历的关注,凸显了他们在灾难发生期间和灾后如何减轻基于性别的暴力的决策前沿所发挥的重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信