Silhouette Profiles in the Assessment of Facial Aesthetics: A Comparison of Cases Treated with Damon and Traditional Braces

Aadhirai Gopinath, Samyuktha, Dilip Srinivasan, S. Kishore
{"title":"Silhouette Profiles in the Assessment of Facial Aesthetics: A Comparison of Cases Treated with Damon and Traditional Braces","authors":"Aadhirai Gopinath, Samyuktha, Dilip Srinivasan, S. Kishore","doi":"10.1177/03015742241231084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate the perception of patient’s soft tissue profiles treated with Damon and traditional braces (MBT) in non-extraction cases. Methods: The record of 14 patients (five Damon, five MBT, and four Duplicated) non extraction cases was included in the study. A total of 28 resulting profile silhouettes (pre- and post-treatment profile photographs) were evaluated by 90 examiners (orthodontists, general dentists, laypersons) using a Likert scale to rate the profiles randomly. Statistical analysis (Student t-test, ANOVA) revealed significant differences both between and within groups. Results: The Laypersons, General dentist, and Orthodontist significantly gave high scores for Damon system compared to (MBT system). It is seen that both male and female examiners gave high scores for Damon compared to MBT system. Conclusion: Damon system was found to have a perceptible difference in the profile improvement when compared to MBT with all three groups of examiners.","PeriodicalId":31847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society","volume":"8 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03015742241231084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate the perception of patient’s soft tissue profiles treated with Damon and traditional braces (MBT) in non-extraction cases. Methods: The record of 14 patients (five Damon, five MBT, and four Duplicated) non extraction cases was included in the study. A total of 28 resulting profile silhouettes (pre- and post-treatment profile photographs) were evaluated by 90 examiners (orthodontists, general dentists, laypersons) using a Likert scale to rate the profiles randomly. Statistical analysis (Student t-test, ANOVA) revealed significant differences both between and within groups. Results: The Laypersons, General dentist, and Orthodontist significantly gave high scores for Damon system compared to (MBT system). It is seen that both male and female examiners gave high scores for Damon compared to MBT system. Conclusion: Damon system was found to have a perceptible difference in the profile improvement when compared to MBT with all three groups of examiners.
面部美学评估中的轮廓剖面图:戴蒙矫正器和传统矫正器治疗病例的比较
目的:本研究旨在比较和评估在非拔牙病例中使用戴蒙牙套和传统牙套(MBT)治疗的患者对软组织外形的感觉。研究方法本研究包括 14 名非拔牙病例患者(5 名戴蒙患者、5 名 MBT 患者和 4 名复式患者)的记录。90 名检查人员(正畸医生、普通牙医、非专业人员)使用李克特量表对总共 28 个结果轮廓剪影(治疗前和治疗后的轮廓照片)进行了评估,并对轮廓进行了随机评分。统计分析(学生 t 检验、方差分析)显示,组间和组内差异显著。结果显示与(MBT 系统)相比,非专业人士、普通牙医和正畸医生对 Damon 系统的评分明显较高。与 MBT 系统相比,男性和女性检查者对 Damon 系统的评分都很高。结论:与 MBT 系统相比,Damon 系统在三组检查者的轮廓改善方面都有明显的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信