Evaluation of Enamel Volume Loss after Exposure to Energy Drinks

Oral Pub Date : 2024-02-23 DOI:10.3390/oral4010009
Karen A. Schulze, Noëlle M. Santucci, Bina Surti, Stefan Habelitz, Mouchumi Bhattacharyya, Warden Noble
{"title":"Evaluation of Enamel Volume Loss after Exposure to Energy Drinks","authors":"Karen A. Schulze, Noëlle M. Santucci, Bina Surti, Stefan Habelitz, Mouchumi Bhattacharyya, Warden Noble","doi":"10.3390/oral4010009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This study was conducted to determine the erosive potential of various commercial energy drinks (EDs), sports drinks (SDs), and sugar sweetened beverages (SSBs) and to correlate quantitative changes in tooth enamel volume loss based on the pH and titratable acidity of the drinks. Methods: A flat plane on the facial surface of 36 human incisor teeth was created and embedded in sample holders using resin. After pre-scanning with a profilometer (Proscan 2000, Scantron, Ind Products Ltd., Taunton, UK), the six samples per group were immersed for 4 h into either Monster Energy™ (ED), Rockstar™ (ED), Red Bull™ (ED), or 5-h Energy™ (ED) and, for comparison with a sports drink, Gatorade™ (SD) and a sugar sweetened beverage, Coca-Cola® (SSB). After immersion and post-scanning, the quantitative volume loss of the tooth enamel of the 36 samples was calculated (Proscan 3D software V2.1.1.15B), and the pH and titratable acidity (TA) of each drink was determined. Results: All drinks tested caused enamel volume loss. The actual amount varied among the different drinks, from 0.39 mm3 for Red Bull™, up to 1.01 mm3 for Gatorade™. The pH measurements differed for each drink, ranging from 2.6 to 3.7. There was a small reverse correlation of 0.326 between the pH of all drinks and volume loss. Among the energy drinks, titratable acidity was similar and there was only a weak correlation between TA and volume loss (0.319 at p = 0.53). Conclusions: Energy drinks, sugar sweetened beverages, and sport drinks all have the potential to cause enamel tooth surface loss resulting in demineralization. Therefore, the pH of a drink cannot be the sole determinant for choosing a less harmful commercial beverage.","PeriodicalId":19685,"journal":{"name":"Oral","volume":"22 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/oral4010009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study was conducted to determine the erosive potential of various commercial energy drinks (EDs), sports drinks (SDs), and sugar sweetened beverages (SSBs) and to correlate quantitative changes in tooth enamel volume loss based on the pH and titratable acidity of the drinks. Methods: A flat plane on the facial surface of 36 human incisor teeth was created and embedded in sample holders using resin. After pre-scanning with a profilometer (Proscan 2000, Scantron, Ind Products Ltd., Taunton, UK), the six samples per group were immersed for 4 h into either Monster Energy™ (ED), Rockstar™ (ED), Red Bull™ (ED), or 5-h Energy™ (ED) and, for comparison with a sports drink, Gatorade™ (SD) and a sugar sweetened beverage, Coca-Cola® (SSB). After immersion and post-scanning, the quantitative volume loss of the tooth enamel of the 36 samples was calculated (Proscan 3D software V2.1.1.15B), and the pH and titratable acidity (TA) of each drink was determined. Results: All drinks tested caused enamel volume loss. The actual amount varied among the different drinks, from 0.39 mm3 for Red Bull™, up to 1.01 mm3 for Gatorade™. The pH measurements differed for each drink, ranging from 2.6 to 3.7. There was a small reverse correlation of 0.326 between the pH of all drinks and volume loss. Among the energy drinks, titratable acidity was similar and there was only a weak correlation between TA and volume loss (0.319 at p = 0.53). Conclusions: Energy drinks, sugar sweetened beverages, and sport drinks all have the potential to cause enamel tooth surface loss resulting in demineralization. Therefore, the pH of a drink cannot be the sole determinant for choosing a less harmful commercial beverage.
评估接触能量饮料后牙釉质体积的损失
研究目的本研究旨在确定各种商业能量饮料(ED)、运动饮料(SD)和含糖饮料(SSB)的侵蚀潜力,并根据饮料的 pH 值和可滴定酸度对牙釉质体积损失的定量变化进行相关分析。研究方法在 36 颗人类门牙的面部创建一个平面,并用树脂将其嵌入样本夹中。使用轮廓仪(Proscan 2000,Scantron,Ind Products Ltd.,Taunton,UK)进行预扫描后,将每组的 6 个样本分别浸入 Monster Energy™ (ED)、Rockstar™ (ED)、Red Bull™ (ED) 或 5-h Energy™ (ED) 中 4 小时,并与运动饮料佳得乐™ (SD) 和含糖饮料可口可乐® (SSB) 进行比较。浸泡和扫描后,计算 36 个样本的牙釉质定量体积损失(Proscan 3D 软件 V2.1.1.15B),并测定每种饮料的 pH 值和可滴定酸度(TA)。结果所有测试饮料都会造成牙釉质体积损失。不同饮料的实际损失量各不相同,红牛™的损失量为0.39立方毫米,佳得乐™的损失量则高达1.01立方毫米。每种饮料的 pH 值测量值也不同,从 2.6 到 3.7 不等。所有饮料的 pH 值与体积损失之间存在 0.326 的微小反向相关性。在能量饮料中,可滴定酸度相似,可滴定酸度与体积损失之间只有微弱的相关性(0.319,p = 0.53)。结论能量饮料、含糖饮料和运动饮料都有可能导致釉质牙齿表面脱落,造成牙齿脱矿。因此,饮料的酸碱度不能作为选择危害较小的商业饮料的唯一决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信