Comparison of elastic stable intramedullary nailing versus Kirschner wires in treatment of pediatric radial neck fractures

Kaixuan Tian, Jin-chao Cao, Xinjian Pei, Yuchang Liu, Tianyou Li, Yazhou Li
{"title":"Comparison of elastic stable intramedullary nailing versus Kirschner wires in treatment of pediatric radial neck fractures","authors":"Kaixuan Tian, Jin-chao Cao, Xinjian Pei, Yuchang Liu, Tianyou Li, Yazhou Li","doi":"10.1177/18632521241233444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study was to compare the different internal fixations between elastic stable intramedullary nailing and Kirschner wires in treatment of angulated radial neck fractures. We retrospectively reviewed the patients with radial neck fracture without associated injuries who underwent surgery approach in our department during April 2011–March 2020. There were 62 patients meeting all the criteria with complete clinical data, with median age of 7.5 (IQR 5.8–9.5) years, 34 males and 28 females. The preoperative fracture pattern was assessed according to the Judet classification system. Depending on the materials implanted and fixation strategy, the patients could be divided into a Kirschner wire group and an elastic stable intramedullary nailing group. Final functional outcomes of patients were assessed by the Mayo Elbow Performance Score and Tibone–Stoltz functional evaluation classification. The Kirschner wire group included 37 patients, with 4.8 years median follow-up. The elastic stable intramedullary nailing group included 25 patients with 5.9 years median follow-up. There were no significant differences in gender, age, Judet classification, average operative time, Mayo Elbow Performance Score, Tibone–Stoltz classification, or length of hospital stay between groups. However, the time to union in the Kirschner wire group was significantly shorter than that in the elastic stable intramedullary nailing group (p < 0.05). Both groups achieved satisfactory functional and cosmetic results. In the management of pediatric radial neck fractures, both elastic stable intramedullary nailing and Kirschner wire internal fixation have shown equivalent therapeutic results, leading to satisfactory functional outcomes. The selection of the internal fixation approach can be influenced by the patient’s fracture characteristics and the surgeon’s preferences. Level III; Retrospective Comparison; Treatment Study.","PeriodicalId":138259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Children's Orthopaedics","volume":"3 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Children's Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18632521241233444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare the different internal fixations between elastic stable intramedullary nailing and Kirschner wires in treatment of angulated radial neck fractures. We retrospectively reviewed the patients with radial neck fracture without associated injuries who underwent surgery approach in our department during April 2011–March 2020. There were 62 patients meeting all the criteria with complete clinical data, with median age of 7.5 (IQR 5.8–9.5) years, 34 males and 28 females. The preoperative fracture pattern was assessed according to the Judet classification system. Depending on the materials implanted and fixation strategy, the patients could be divided into a Kirschner wire group and an elastic stable intramedullary nailing group. Final functional outcomes of patients were assessed by the Mayo Elbow Performance Score and Tibone–Stoltz functional evaluation classification. The Kirschner wire group included 37 patients, with 4.8 years median follow-up. The elastic stable intramedullary nailing group included 25 patients with 5.9 years median follow-up. There were no significant differences in gender, age, Judet classification, average operative time, Mayo Elbow Performance Score, Tibone–Stoltz classification, or length of hospital stay between groups. However, the time to union in the Kirschner wire group was significantly shorter than that in the elastic stable intramedullary nailing group (p < 0.05). Both groups achieved satisfactory functional and cosmetic results. In the management of pediatric radial neck fractures, both elastic stable intramedullary nailing and Kirschner wire internal fixation have shown equivalent therapeutic results, leading to satisfactory functional outcomes. The selection of the internal fixation approach can be influenced by the patient’s fracture characteristics and the surgeon’s preferences. Level III; Retrospective Comparison; Treatment Study.
在治疗小儿桡骨颈骨折时比较弹性稳定髓内钉和 Kirschner 钢丝
本研究旨在比较弹性稳定髓内钉和Kirschner钢丝在治疗成角桡骨颈骨折中的不同内固定方法。我们回顾性分析了 2011 年 4 月至 2020 年 3 月期间在我科接受手术治疗的无伴发损伤的桡骨颈骨折患者。符合所有标准且临床资料完整的患者共有 62 例,中位年龄为 7.5 岁(IQR 5.8-9.5),男性 34 例,女性 28 例。术前骨折模式根据 Judet 分类系统进行评估。根据植入材料和固定策略的不同,患者可分为基氏钢丝组和弹性稳定髓内钉组。患者的最终功能结果由梅奥肘关节功能评分和Tibone-Stoltz功能评估分类进行评估。Kirschner钢丝组包括37名患者,中位随访时间为4.8年。弹性稳定髓内钉组包括25名患者,中位随访时间为5.9年。各组之间在性别、年龄、Judet分级、平均手术时间、梅奥肘关节表现评分、Tibone-Stoltz分级或住院时间等方面均无明显差异。不过,Kirschner钢丝组的骨结合时间明显短于弹性稳定髓内钉组(P < 0.05)。两组均获得了令人满意的功能和外观效果。在小儿桡骨颈骨折的治疗中,弹性稳定髓内钉和Kirschner钢丝内固定的治疗效果相当,都能达到满意的功能效果。患者的骨折特点和外科医生的偏好会影响内固定方法的选择。III级;回顾性比较;治疗研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信