A Retrospective Study: The Effectiveness of Lipid-Lowering Medications in Individuals at High Risk for Cardiovascular Disease

F. Kayan, S. Günlü
{"title":"A Retrospective Study: The Effectiveness of Lipid-Lowering Medications in Individuals at High Risk for Cardiovascular Disease","authors":"F. Kayan, S. Günlü","doi":"10.5798/dicletip.1451412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The effective administration of lipid-lowering treatment is of utmost importance in mitigating cardiovascular (CV) risk in patients who are undergoing secondary prevention. \nHigh-dose statins, ezetimibe, and the relatively newer PCSK9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) have shown effectiveness in achieving low density lipoprotein cholesterol(LDL-C) treatment targets for these patients. \nHowever, despite substantial evidence supporting their efficacy, these interventions remain significantly underutilized, primarily due to poor levels of patient adherence. \nMoreover, there is limited data available on the overall effectiveness of cholesterol-lowering treatment and the proportion of secondary prevention patients who have achieved a well-regulated lipid profile. \nIn light of these factors, the principal aim of this investigation was to evaluate the present status of lipid-lowering medication within this specific group of individuals. \nMethods: The study was conducted at Mardin Artuklu University, Mardin Training and Research Hospital between April 2021 and March 2023, focusing on patients with a history of secondary prevention of CVD. The study investigated prescribed cholesterol-lowering drugs, factors contributing to statin underuse, and lipid profile disclosure. \nResults: 872 patients were included. 86.8% received statins, 5.2% ezetimibe, and 3.4% fibrates, while 13.2% received no lipid-lowering therapy. 64% of those on statins were on high doses. LDL-C values were assessed in 452 patients, with only 30% below the recommended cutoff of 70 mg/dL. \nConclusion: In this investigation involving secondary prevention patients, slightly over half of the participants received high-dose statins, while a negligible proportion received ezetimibe treatment. \nAlarmingly, over two-thirds of the patients demonstrated LDL-C values that deviated significantly from the therapeutic range, indicating a considerable gap between their lipid profiles and the recommendations set forth by clinical guidelines.","PeriodicalId":11203,"journal":{"name":"Dicle Tıp Dergisi","volume":"37 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dicle Tıp Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.1451412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The effective administration of lipid-lowering treatment is of utmost importance in mitigating cardiovascular (CV) risk in patients who are undergoing secondary prevention. High-dose statins, ezetimibe, and the relatively newer PCSK9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) have shown effectiveness in achieving low density lipoprotein cholesterol(LDL-C) treatment targets for these patients. However, despite substantial evidence supporting their efficacy, these interventions remain significantly underutilized, primarily due to poor levels of patient adherence. Moreover, there is limited data available on the overall effectiveness of cholesterol-lowering treatment and the proportion of secondary prevention patients who have achieved a well-regulated lipid profile. In light of these factors, the principal aim of this investigation was to evaluate the present status of lipid-lowering medication within this specific group of individuals. Methods: The study was conducted at Mardin Artuklu University, Mardin Training and Research Hospital between April 2021 and March 2023, focusing on patients with a history of secondary prevention of CVD. The study investigated prescribed cholesterol-lowering drugs, factors contributing to statin underuse, and lipid profile disclosure. Results: 872 patients were included. 86.8% received statins, 5.2% ezetimibe, and 3.4% fibrates, while 13.2% received no lipid-lowering therapy. 64% of those on statins were on high doses. LDL-C values were assessed in 452 patients, with only 30% below the recommended cutoff of 70 mg/dL. Conclusion: In this investigation involving secondary prevention patients, slightly over half of the participants received high-dose statins, while a negligible proportion received ezetimibe treatment. Alarmingly, over two-thirds of the patients demonstrated LDL-C values that deviated significantly from the therapeutic range, indicating a considerable gap between their lipid profiles and the recommendations set forth by clinical guidelines.
一项回顾性研究:降脂药物对心血管疾病高危人群的疗效
目的:有效实施降脂治疗对于降低接受二级预防的患者的心血管(CV)风险至关重要。高剂量他汀类药物、依折麦布和相对较新的 PCSK9 抑制剂(PCSK9i)在实现这些患者的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)治疗目标方面显示出了有效性。然而,尽管有大量证据支持其疗效,但这些干预措施的利用率仍然很低,主要原因是患者的依从性很差。此外,关于降胆固醇治疗的总体效果以及二级预防患者中实现血脂状况良好调节的比例的数据也很有限。鉴于这些因素,本次调查的主要目的是评估这一特殊群体中降脂药物的使用现状。研究方法研究于 2021 年 4 月至 2023 年 3 月期间在马尔丁阿尔图克鲁大学马尔丁培训与研究医院进行,主要针对有心血管疾病二级预防史的患者。研究调查了处方降胆固醇药物、导致他汀类药物使用不足的因素以及血脂概况披露。研究结果共纳入 872 名患者。86.8%的患者接受了他汀类药物治疗,5.2%的患者接受了依折麦布治疗,3.4%的患者接受了纤维酸盐治疗,13.2%的患者未接受任何降脂治疗。在接受他汀类药物治疗的患者中,64%为高剂量患者。对 452 名患者的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇值进行了评估,只有 30% 低于 70 毫克/分升的推荐临界值。结论:在这项涉及二级预防患者的调查中,略多于一半的参与者接受了高剂量他汀类药物治疗,而接受依折麦布治疗的比例微乎其微。令人担忧的是,超过三分之二的患者的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)值明显偏离治疗范围,这表明他们的血脂状况与临床指南的建议之间存在相当大的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信