The Difference in Clinical Knowledge Between Staff Employed at Faith-based and Public Facilities in Malawi

Q4 Medicine
Wiktoria Tafesse, Martin Chalkley
{"title":"The Difference in Clinical Knowledge Between Staff Employed at Faith-based and Public Facilities in Malawi","authors":"Wiktoria Tafesse, Martin Chalkley","doi":"10.15566/cjgh.v11i1.853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Empirical evidence concerning differences in the quality of service offered by faith-based and public healthcare facilities in low- and middle-income countries is limited. This study contributes by examining the difference in clinical knowledge of staff based at faith-based and government facilities in Malawi.  Using vignette data for individual healthcare workers from the 2018/2019 Malawi Harmonised Health Facility Assessment we undertake regression analysis of the relationship between ownership and the probability of respondents making the correct diagnosis, treatment and management choices for eight childhood, adult and pregnancy-related cases after accounting for differences across healthcare workers, facilities and geography. Staff employed at faith-based facilities, compared to staff at public facilities, are found to be less likely to correctly diagnose and treat children presenting with diarrhoea with severe dehydration but are better at diagnosing and treating adults presenting with diabetes.  We do not find any differences in the diagnosis and treatment of the remaining six cases. Hence, we do not find compelling evidence of an overall difference in clinical knowledge across staff at faith-based compared to public facilities in Malawi. \n ","PeriodicalId":52275,"journal":{"name":"Christian Journal for Global Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Christian Journal for Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15566/cjgh.v11i1.853","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Empirical evidence concerning differences in the quality of service offered by faith-based and public healthcare facilities in low- and middle-income countries is limited. This study contributes by examining the difference in clinical knowledge of staff based at faith-based and government facilities in Malawi.  Using vignette data for individual healthcare workers from the 2018/2019 Malawi Harmonised Health Facility Assessment we undertake regression analysis of the relationship between ownership and the probability of respondents making the correct diagnosis, treatment and management choices for eight childhood, adult and pregnancy-related cases after accounting for differences across healthcare workers, facilities and geography. Staff employed at faith-based facilities, compared to staff at public facilities, are found to be less likely to correctly diagnose and treat children presenting with diarrhoea with severe dehydration but are better at diagnosing and treating adults presenting with diabetes.  We do not find any differences in the diagnosis and treatment of the remaining six cases. Hence, we do not find compelling evidence of an overall difference in clinical knowledge across staff at faith-based compared to public facilities in Malawi.  
马拉维信仰机构和公共机构员工在临床知识方面的差异
有关中低收入国家信仰医疗机构和公共医疗机构服务质量差异的经验证据十分有限。本研究通过考察马拉维信仰机构和政府机构工作人员在临床知识方面的差异做出了贡献。 利用 2018/2019 年马拉维统一医疗机构评估中的医护人员个人小节数据,我们对所有权与受访者对八个儿童、成人和妊娠相关病例做出正确诊断、治疗和管理选择的概率之间的关系进行了回归分析,并考虑了不同医护人员、医疗机构和地域之间的差异。我们发现,与公共医疗机构的工作人员相比,宗教机构的工作人员在正确诊断和治疗腹泻伴严重脱水的儿童病例方面的可能性较低,但在诊断和治疗糖尿病成人病例方面的可能性较高。 在诊断和治疗其余 6 个病例方面,我们没有发现任何差异。因此,我们没有发现令人信服的证据表明马拉维宗教机构与公共机构的员工在临床知识方面存在整体差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Christian Journal for Global Health
Christian Journal for Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信