Revisiting “What is Strategy?” and Why it Matters

Kenneth Cory
{"title":"Revisiting “What is Strategy?” and Why it Matters","authors":"Kenneth Cory","doi":"10.1108/sl-07-2023-0077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThere are few concepts in the modern business lexicon where people feel as strongly confident in their understanding of its meaning – while there is simultaneously such profound disagreement in how people actually define the term – than the concept of “strategy.” After decades of research and publications trying to correct this situation, the problem remains. It is difficult to advance the field, teach the field, or even effectively put it into practice if you cannot define what “it” is in a clear, concise, and meaningful way. This paper offers updated definitions of key strategic management concepts.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA large academic and practitioner literature review was added to the author’s personal experience as a Fortune 500 chief strategy officer and university professor to identify five separate concepts at the heart of current colloquial uses of the term “strategy.” These concepts were then clarified and defined with implications summarized.\n\n\nFindings\nThe generic term “strategy” is frequently used in place of multiple other very distinct concepts. This problem of concept ambiguity can be greatly reduced by understanding and emphasizing the definitions and usage of five other, already existing, business terms – “Strategic Management,” “Strategic Planning Process,” “Strategic Plan,” “Realized Strategy,” and “Business Model.”\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper identifies the negative effects of the misuse of the term strategy and offers clear, concise remedies. Resolving the definition problems is a necessary precursor to the advancement, education, and practice of the field.\n","PeriodicalId":169963,"journal":{"name":"Strategy & Leadership","volume":"32 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategy & Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sl-07-2023-0077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose There are few concepts in the modern business lexicon where people feel as strongly confident in their understanding of its meaning – while there is simultaneously such profound disagreement in how people actually define the term – than the concept of “strategy.” After decades of research and publications trying to correct this situation, the problem remains. It is difficult to advance the field, teach the field, or even effectively put it into practice if you cannot define what “it” is in a clear, concise, and meaningful way. This paper offers updated definitions of key strategic management concepts. Design/methodology/approach A large academic and practitioner literature review was added to the author’s personal experience as a Fortune 500 chief strategy officer and university professor to identify five separate concepts at the heart of current colloquial uses of the term “strategy.” These concepts were then clarified and defined with implications summarized. Findings The generic term “strategy” is frequently used in place of multiple other very distinct concepts. This problem of concept ambiguity can be greatly reduced by understanding and emphasizing the definitions and usage of five other, already existing, business terms – “Strategic Management,” “Strategic Planning Process,” “Strategic Plan,” “Realized Strategy,” and “Business Model.” Originality/value This paper identifies the negative effects of the misuse of the term strategy and offers clear, concise remedies. Resolving the definition problems is a necessary precursor to the advancement, education, and practice of the field.
重新审视 "什么是战略?"及其重要性
目的在现代商业词典中,很少有一个概念能比 "战略 "这个概念更让人们对其含义的理解充满信心,而同时人们对这个词的实际定义却存在如此深刻的分歧。经过数十年的研究和出版,试图纠正这种情况,但问题依然存在。如果不能清晰、简明、有意义地定义 "它 "是什么,就很难推动这一领域的发展、教授这一领域的知识,甚至无法有效地将其付诸实践。本文提供了关键战略管理概念的最新定义。设计/方法论/方法 除了作者作为《财富》500 强企业首席战略官和大学教授的个人经验外,还对大量学术和实践文献进行了回顾,从而确定了当前 "战略 "一词口语化使用的五个核心概念。研究结果 "战略 "这一通用术语经常被用来替代其他多个截然不同的概念。通过理解和强调其他五个已经存在的商业术语--"战略管理"、"战略规划过程"、"战略计划"、"实现战略 "和 "商业模式"--的定义和用法,可以大大减少概念模糊的问题。解决定义问题是该领域进步、教育和实践的必要前提。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信