Can triglyceride related indices be reliable markers in the assessment of polycystic ovarian syndrome?

Ali Yavuzcan, Betül Keyif, Gizem Yavuzcan, Gökhan Göynümer
{"title":"Can triglyceride related indices be reliable markers in the assessment of polycystic ovarian syndrome?","authors":"Ali Yavuzcan, Betül Keyif, Gizem Yavuzcan, Gökhan Göynümer","doi":"10.1515/tjb-2023-0215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of the Triglyceride Glucose (TyG), Triglyceride Glucose–Body Mass (TyG-BMI), and Lipid Accumulation Product (LAP) indices for both screening Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) and diagnosing insulin resistance (IR) in women diagnosed with PCOS.\n \n \n \n Retrospective data from medical records of 124 women were analyzed, with 71 in the PCOS group and 53 in the non-PCOS group. The PCOS diagnosis followed the 2003 Rotterdam criteria. Basic clinical and biochemical parameters were compared. The TyG index was computed using the formula ln [Triglyceride (TG) (mmol/L) × fasting plasma glukose (FPG) (mg/dL)/2]. TyG-BMI value was derived as TyG × BMI. LAP was calculated as (waist circumference (WC-58) × TG (mmol/L). IR was identified if Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) was >2.7.\n \n \n \n TyG-BMI (AUC=0.62) and LAP indices (AUC=0.61) did not demonstrate statistically significant diagnostic performance for PCOS. Regarding IR in PCOS patients, the highest AUC was for TyG-BMI (0.84, 95 % CI: 0.73–0.93, p<0.001) with a cutoff at 116.15, showing 80 % sensitivity and 86 % specificity. LAP had an AUC of 0.86 with a cutoff of 30.21 (sensitivity 80 %, specificity 81 %), while TyG showed an AUC of 0.78 (95 % CI: 0.67–0.89, p<0.001) with a cutoff of 4.47, demonstrating a sensitivity of 70 % and specificity of 72 %.\n \n \n \n Numerous biochemical markers have been explored for PCOS detection, however, many are expensive, not universally available, and necessitate specific test kits. TyG, TyG-BMI, and LAP indices might not serve as reliable markers for PCOS screening but could offer utility in identifying IR in Turkish women diagnosed with PCOS.\n","PeriodicalId":23344,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Biochemistry","volume":"27 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/tjb-2023-0215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of the Triglyceride Glucose (TyG), Triglyceride Glucose–Body Mass (TyG-BMI), and Lipid Accumulation Product (LAP) indices for both screening Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) and diagnosing insulin resistance (IR) in women diagnosed with PCOS. Retrospective data from medical records of 124 women were analyzed, with 71 in the PCOS group and 53 in the non-PCOS group. The PCOS diagnosis followed the 2003 Rotterdam criteria. Basic clinical and biochemical parameters were compared. The TyG index was computed using the formula ln [Triglyceride (TG) (mmol/L) × fasting plasma glukose (FPG) (mg/dL)/2]. TyG-BMI value was derived as TyG × BMI. LAP was calculated as (waist circumference (WC-58) × TG (mmol/L). IR was identified if Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) was >2.7. TyG-BMI (AUC=0.62) and LAP indices (AUC=0.61) did not demonstrate statistically significant diagnostic performance for PCOS. Regarding IR in PCOS patients, the highest AUC was for TyG-BMI (0.84, 95 % CI: 0.73–0.93, p<0.001) with a cutoff at 116.15, showing 80 % sensitivity and 86 % specificity. LAP had an AUC of 0.86 with a cutoff of 30.21 (sensitivity 80 %, specificity 81 %), while TyG showed an AUC of 0.78 (95 % CI: 0.67–0.89, p<0.001) with a cutoff of 4.47, demonstrating a sensitivity of 70 % and specificity of 72 %. Numerous biochemical markers have been explored for PCOS detection, however, many are expensive, not universally available, and necessitate specific test kits. TyG, TyG-BMI, and LAP indices might not serve as reliable markers for PCOS screening but could offer utility in identifying IR in Turkish women diagnosed with PCOS.
甘油三酯相关指数能否成为评估多囊卵巢综合征的可靠指标?
本研究旨在评估甘油三酯血糖(TyG)、甘油三酯血糖-体重(TyG-BMI)和脂质累积产物(LAP)指数在筛查多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)和诊断多囊卵巢综合征女性胰岛素抵抗(IR)方面的诊断效用。 研究分析了 124 名妇女的病历回顾数据,其中多囊卵巢综合征组 71 人,非多囊卵巢综合征组 53 人。多囊卵巢综合症的诊断遵循 2003 年鹿特丹标准。对基本的临床和生化参数进行了比较。TyG指数的计算公式为ln[甘油三酯(TG)(mmol/L)×空腹血浆葡萄糖(FPG)(mg/dL)/2]。TyG-BMI 值为 TyG × BMI。LAP计算公式为(腰围(WC-58)×TG(mmol/L))。如果胰岛素抵抗的稳态模型评估(HOMA-IR)大于 2.7,则确定为 IR。 TyG-BMI指数(AUC=0.62)和LAP指数(AUC=0.61)对多囊卵巢综合症的诊断效果没有统计学意义。关于 PCOS 患者的 IR,TyG-BMI 的 AUC 最高(0.84,95 % CI:0.73-0.93,p<0.001),临界值为 116.15,显示出 80 % 的灵敏度和 86 % 的特异性。LAP 的 AUC 为 0.86,临界值为 30.21(灵敏度为 80%,特异度为 81%);TyG 的 AUC 为 0.78(95 % CI:0.67-0.89,p<0.001),临界值为 4.47,灵敏度为 70%,特异度为 72%。 许多生化标志物已被用于多囊卵巢综合症的检测,但其中许多标志物价格昂贵,并非普遍可用,而且需要特定的检测试剂盒。TyG、TyG-BMI 和 LAP 指数可能不能作为多囊卵巢综合症筛查的可靠标记物,但可用于鉴别确诊为多囊卵巢综合症的土耳其妇女的内分泌失调情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信