Beyond the participant-researcher division: co-creating ethical relationships through care and rapport in studies of post-laryngectomy communication

IF 0.4 0 PHILOSOPHY
Diametros Pub Date : 2024-02-26 DOI:10.33392/diam.1942
Joanna Komorowska-Mach, Adrianna Wojdat, Konrad Zieliński
{"title":"Beyond the participant-researcher division: co-creating ethical relationships through care and rapport in studies of post-laryngectomy communication","authors":"Joanna Komorowska-Mach, Adrianna Wojdat, Konrad Zieliński","doi":"10.33392/diam.1942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents the ethical implications for social science research emerging from our study on interpersonal communication after a laryngectomy. By tracing the evolution of our approach through specific research experiences and participant feedback, we provide empirical support for a flexible, multidimensional, and relational understanding of key ethical concepts, such as vulnerability and the researcher-participant relationship. Our approach has shifted from institutionally imposed rigid categorizations and somewhat stereotypical treatment of both the research group and the researcher-participant relationship to an emphasis on building relationships founded on mutual care and rapport. We argue that this revised perspective fosters ethical collaboration that is beneficial and secure for all parties involved, and we offer practical examples of its implementation in research practice.","PeriodicalId":42290,"journal":{"name":"Diametros","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diametros","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33392/diam.1942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents the ethical implications for social science research emerging from our study on interpersonal communication after a laryngectomy. By tracing the evolution of our approach through specific research experiences and participant feedback, we provide empirical support for a flexible, multidimensional, and relational understanding of key ethical concepts, such as vulnerability and the researcher-participant relationship. Our approach has shifted from institutionally imposed rigid categorizations and somewhat stereotypical treatment of both the research group and the researcher-participant relationship to an emphasis on building relationships founded on mutual care and rapport. We argue that this revised perspective fosters ethical collaboration that is beneficial and secure for all parties involved, and we offer practical examples of its implementation in research practice.
超越参与者与研究者之间的分歧:在喉切除术后交流研究中通过关怀和融洽共同创建伦理关系
本文介绍了我们对喉切除术后人际沟通的研究对社会科学研究产生的伦理影响。通过追溯我们的研究方法在具体研究经历和参与者反馈中的演变过程,我们为灵活、多维和关联性地理解关键伦理概念(如脆弱性和研究者与参与者的关系)提供了实证支持。我们的方法已经从机构强加的僵化分类以及对研究小组和研究者与参与者关系的刻板处理,转变为强调建立在相互关心和融洽关系基础上的关系。我们认为,这种经过修订的观点能够促进对所有相关方都有利且安全的伦理合作,我们还提供了在研究实践中实施这种观点的实例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diametros
Diametros PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信