Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Literature Review in Social Manufacturing

IF 1.4 Q4 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Marti Widya Sari, I. B. Dharma, Herianto, A. Tontowi
{"title":"Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Literature Review in Social Manufacturing","authors":"Marti Widya Sari, I. B. Dharma, Herianto, A. Tontowi","doi":"10.2478/mspe-2024-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study aims to map out social manufacturing research and the distribution of social manufacturing research, which can be used as a reference for social manufacturing research. Various studies on social manufacturing have been carried out to explore various insights on social manufacturing in different domains. This study was conducted in 2021, and explored the social manufacturing literature using bibliometric analysis methods. The approach used in the bibliometric analysis is the citation analysis to see one article cited by another article, and the co-citation analysis approach to find two or more articles cited by one article. In this study, the data source used is from the Scopus database, with social manufacturing keyword. The results show the types of analysis that have been processed include co-authorship (authors, organizations, countries), citations (authors), and co-citations (sources, cited authors). This research still has limitations, because it use the Scopus database only, so for further research, it could be added with other sources, such as Web of Science, PubMed, Crossref, etc. In addition, there are still many visualization results using VOSviewer software that could be explored further, such as the type of analysis citation-document, citation-organization, bibliographic coupling, which has not been discussed in this study.","PeriodicalId":44097,"journal":{"name":"Management Systems in Production Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management Systems in Production Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/mspe-2024-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to map out social manufacturing research and the distribution of social manufacturing research, which can be used as a reference for social manufacturing research. Various studies on social manufacturing have been carried out to explore various insights on social manufacturing in different domains. This study was conducted in 2021, and explored the social manufacturing literature using bibliometric analysis methods. The approach used in the bibliometric analysis is the citation analysis to see one article cited by another article, and the co-citation analysis approach to find two or more articles cited by one article. In this study, the data source used is from the Scopus database, with social manufacturing keyword. The results show the types of analysis that have been processed include co-authorship (authors, organizations, countries), citations (authors), and co-citations (sources, cited authors). This research still has limitations, because it use the Scopus database only, so for further research, it could be added with other sources, such as Web of Science, PubMed, Crossref, etc. In addition, there are still many visualization results using VOSviewer software that could be explored further, such as the type of analysis citation-document, citation-organization, bibliographic coupling, which has not been discussed in this study.
社会制造业的文献计量分析和系统文献综述
本研究旨在绘制社会制造研究和社会制造研究分布图,为社会制造研究提供参考。关于社会制造的研究多种多样,以探索不同领域对社会制造的各种见解。本研究于 2021 年开展,采用文献计量分析方法对社会制造文献进行了探索。文献计量分析中使用的方法是引文分析法,即查看一篇文章被另一篇文章引用的情况,以及共引分析法,即查找两篇或更多文章被一篇文章引用的情况。本研究使用的数据源来自 Scopus 数据库,关键词为社会制造业。结果显示,已处理的分析类型包括合著(作者、组织、国家)、引文(作者)和共引(来源、被引作者)。这项研究仍有局限性,因为它只使用了 Scopus 数据库,所以为了进一步研究,还可以增加其他来源,如 Web of Science、PubMed、Crossref 等。此外,还有许多使用 VOSviewer 软件的可视化结果可以进一步探讨,比如引文-文献、引文-组织、书目耦合等分析类型,这些在本研究中都没有讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
48
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信