Effect of two recombinant bovine somatotropin formulations on feeding behavior and metabolism of Holstein cows

R. S. Teixeira, Maria Carolina Narval de Araújo, A. Barbosa, Rodrigo de Almeida, Milene Lopes dos Santos, Letícia Alves Martins Duarte, Vanessa Masson Honorio, M. N. Corrêa, F. Pino
{"title":"Effect of two recombinant bovine somatotropin formulations on feeding behavior and metabolism of Holstein cows","authors":"R. S. Teixeira, Maria Carolina Narval de Araújo, A. Barbosa, Rodrigo de Almeida, Milene Lopes dos Santos, Letícia Alves Martins Duarte, Vanessa Masson Honorio, M. N. Corrêa, F. Pino","doi":"10.5433/1679-0359.2024v45n1p315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study evaluated the effect of two commercial forms of recombinant bovine somatotropin (rbST; Later® and Fast®; 500 mg) on feed variability, feeding behavior, zootechnical parameters, and milk production of Holstein cows after peak production. Eighteen cows were randomly divided into two groups and treated with injectable of rbST every 14 days for 70 days. Blood samples were collected on day 1, 4, and 7 of each cycle, to assess circulating levels of non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA). Weight and body condition score (BCS) assessments were performed. Milk yields were measured daily using the DelPro™ software (DeLaval®). Feed consumption and feeding behavior was obtained daily using automatic individual feeders (Intergado®). No difference was observed in dry matter intake (DMI) between groups (P=0.07), and no impact was noted on dietary variability (P=0.64). In addition, animals treated with rbST-Fast exhibited more frequent visits to feeders, longer time in consumption, and higher relative DMI (per percentage of live weight) (P<0.01). Animals in the rbST-Fast group produced more milk than those in the rbST-Later group (P=0.03). Furthermore, the weight of the cows was significantly different (P=0.05) between groups. The weight of the rbST-Fast animals was smaller and varied more than thot of the rbST-Later animals (P <0.01). Nonetheless, no difference was noted in BCS (P=0.30) between the groups. The animals in the rbST-Fast group had higher concentrations of NEFA than those in the rbST-Later group (P<0.01). In conclusion, behavioral and metabolic shifts that sustained greater milk production in the cows receiving rbST-Fast. Nonetheless, these shifts are likely linked to lipomobilization and not dietary variability or consumption, as evidenced by the increase in NEFA and greater weight loss in that group.","PeriodicalId":21921,"journal":{"name":"Semina: Ciências Agrárias","volume":"104 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Semina: Ciências Agrárias","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2024v45n1p315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated the effect of two commercial forms of recombinant bovine somatotropin (rbST; Later® and Fast®; 500 mg) on feed variability, feeding behavior, zootechnical parameters, and milk production of Holstein cows after peak production. Eighteen cows were randomly divided into two groups and treated with injectable of rbST every 14 days for 70 days. Blood samples were collected on day 1, 4, and 7 of each cycle, to assess circulating levels of non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA). Weight and body condition score (BCS) assessments were performed. Milk yields were measured daily using the DelPro™ software (DeLaval®). Feed consumption and feeding behavior was obtained daily using automatic individual feeders (Intergado®). No difference was observed in dry matter intake (DMI) between groups (P=0.07), and no impact was noted on dietary variability (P=0.64). In addition, animals treated with rbST-Fast exhibited more frequent visits to feeders, longer time in consumption, and higher relative DMI (per percentage of live weight) (P<0.01). Animals in the rbST-Fast group produced more milk than those in the rbST-Later group (P=0.03). Furthermore, the weight of the cows was significantly different (P=0.05) between groups. The weight of the rbST-Fast animals was smaller and varied more than thot of the rbST-Later animals (P <0.01). Nonetheless, no difference was noted in BCS (P=0.30) between the groups. The animals in the rbST-Fast group had higher concentrations of NEFA than those in the rbST-Later group (P<0.01). In conclusion, behavioral and metabolic shifts that sustained greater milk production in the cows receiving rbST-Fast. Nonetheless, these shifts are likely linked to lipomobilization and not dietary variability or consumption, as evidenced by the increase in NEFA and greater weight loss in that group.
两种重组牛生长激素配方对荷斯坦奶牛采食行为和新陈代谢的影响
本研究评估了两种商业形式的重组牛体细胞生长激素(rbST;Later® 和 Fast®;500 毫克)对荷斯坦奶牛产奶高峰后的饲料变化、采食行为、动物技术参数和产奶量的影响。将 18 头奶牛随机分为两组,每 14 天注射一次 rbST,连续注射 70 天。在每个周期的第 1、4 和 7 天采集血液样本,以评估非酯化脂肪酸 (NEFA) 的循环水平。进行体重和体况评分(BCS)评估。每天使用 DelPro™ 软件(利拉伐®)测量牛奶产量。每天使用自动个体饲喂器(Intergado®)测定饲料消耗量和饲喂行为。未观察到组间干物质摄入量(DMI)的差异(P=0.07),也未注意到对日粮变异性的影响(P=0.64)。此外,接受 rbST-Fast 治疗的动物到饲喂器的次数更多,消耗时间更长,相对 DMI(每活重百分比)更高(P<0.01)。rbST-Fast组的动物比rbST-Later组的动物产奶量更高(P=0.03)。此外,各组奶牛的体重也有显著差异(P=0.05)。rbST-Fast组奶牛的体重比rbST-Later组奶牛的体重小,且变化更大(P<0.01)。不过,各组间的 BCS 没有差异(P=0.30)。rbST-Fast组动物的NEFA浓度高于rbST-Later组动物(P<0.01)。总之,接受 rbST-Fast 的奶牛的行为和新陈代谢发生了变化,从而维持了更高的产奶量。不过,这些转变很可能与脂肪移动有关,而不是与膳食变化或消耗有关,该组奶牛的 NEFA 增加和体重减轻就证明了这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信