{"title":"Moving On: Rethinking Practice and Transforming Data at the Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of Cambridge","authors":"Lucie Carreau, Imogen Gunn","doi":"10.1177/15501906241234943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scholarly attention is increasingly focusing on museum catalogues: their histories, challenges and, as this paper explores, their potential. Many databases contain outdated information and offensive language, the legacy of colonial-era knowledge production and digitization processes that translated catalogue cards into database entries. Much has been written about the potential of catalogues to act as sites of contact and collaboration, as well as how institutions can and should mitigate harm stemming from discriminatory language within their catalogues. Yet as museum practitioners are acutely aware, the extensive work required to enact change throughout a database is rarely perceived as exciting enough to garner dedicated project funding. This paper uses the Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology and the Stores Move Project (2020–2024) as a case study to illustrate how museums can, and realistically must, integrate critical documentation work into larger projects in order to achieve these objectives. The authors first engage with MAA’s own history of collecting and cataloguing, before detailing how collections staff have incorporated documentation priorities (re-cataloguing, historicizing data, and addressing bias) into the larger Project. They conclude with the hope that by making this work more visible and demonstrating its value, such projects might attract dedicated funding in the future.","PeriodicalId":422403,"journal":{"name":"Collections: A Journal for Museum and Archives Professionals","volume":"21 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collections: A Journal for Museum and Archives Professionals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15501906241234943","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Scholarly attention is increasingly focusing on museum catalogues: their histories, challenges and, as this paper explores, their potential. Many databases contain outdated information and offensive language, the legacy of colonial-era knowledge production and digitization processes that translated catalogue cards into database entries. Much has been written about the potential of catalogues to act as sites of contact and collaboration, as well as how institutions can and should mitigate harm stemming from discriminatory language within their catalogues. Yet as museum practitioners are acutely aware, the extensive work required to enact change throughout a database is rarely perceived as exciting enough to garner dedicated project funding. This paper uses the Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology and the Stores Move Project (2020–2024) as a case study to illustrate how museums can, and realistically must, integrate critical documentation work into larger projects in order to achieve these objectives. The authors first engage with MAA’s own history of collecting and cataloguing, before detailing how collections staff have incorporated documentation priorities (re-cataloguing, historicizing data, and addressing bias) into the larger Project. They conclude with the hope that by making this work more visible and demonstrating its value, such projects might attract dedicated funding in the future.
学术界越来越关注博物馆目录:它们的历史、挑战,以及本文所探讨的它们的潜力。许多数据库包含过时的信息和令人反感的语言,这些都是殖民时代知识生产和数字化过程的遗留问题,这些过程将目录卡片翻译成数据库条目。关于目录作为联系与合作场所的潜力,以及机构如何能够并应该减少目录中的歧视性语言所造成的伤害,已经有很多论述。然而,正如博物馆从业人员所清楚意识到的那样,在整个数据库中进行变革所需的大量工作很少被认为是令人兴奋的,以至于无法获得专门的项目资金。本文以考古学与人类学博物馆和商店搬迁项目(2020-2024 年)为案例,说明博物馆如何能够、而且必须将关键性的文献工作整合到更大的项目中,以实现这些目标。作者首先介绍了 MAA 自身的收藏和编目历史,然后详细说明了收藏人员如何将文献工作的重点(重新编目、数据历史化和解决偏差问题)纳入到更大的项目中。最后,他们希望通过提高这项工作的可见度并展示其价值,此类项目将来可能会吸引到专项资金。