Infectious keratitis after photorefractive keratectomy, femtosecond-LASIK and lenticule extraction in a 100,000-eye case series

Q2 Medicine
Laser therapy Pub Date : 2024-02-27 DOI:10.4081/ltj.2024.389
Antonio Leccisotti, Stefania V. Fields, G. De Bartolo, Christian Crudale
{"title":"Infectious keratitis after photorefractive keratectomy, femtosecond-LASIK and lenticule extraction in a 100,000-eye case series","authors":"Antonio Leccisotti, Stefania V. Fields, G. De Bartolo, Christian Crudale","doi":"10.4081/ltj.2024.389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study evaluates the incidence and outcome of infectious keratitis after laser vision correction by photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), femtosecond LASIK, and keratorefractive lenticule extraction (KLEx) in a retrospective, consecutive, single-institute series. Patients with presumed infectious keratitis between 2011 and 2023 were analyzed. In PRK, manual deepithelialization was done, and mitomycin C was used with spherical equivalents greater than 3 diopters. Femtosecond LASIK and KLEx were performed with an LDV Ziemer laser; the interface was rinsed in both techniques. All treatments received post-operative netilmicin eyedrops. Finally, 106269 eyes of 54278 patients were included; 6 eyes of 6 patients were identified as having infectious keratitis (3 by staphylococci, 3 culture-negative). The overall incidence of infectious keratitis was 0.0056% (0.0164% after PRK, 0.0023% after femtosecond LASIK, 0.1366% after KLEx; Chi2 p<0.00001). The odds ratio for PRK compared to LASIK was 7.2 (p=0.0307); for KLEx compared to LASIK 59.7 (p=0.0008). Presentation after KLEx (2 days) was earlier than after PRK (5, 4, and 5 days) and LASIK (6 and 4 days). In all cases, hourly fortified cefazolin and tobramycin eyedrops were used, with a good response: 3 eyes maintained a 20/20 uncorrected visual acuity; 2 eyes 20/20 with myopic astigmatism; 1 eye ended 20/25 with correction because of irregular astigmatism. In conclusion, infectious keratitis was a rare complication, more common after KLEx and less common after femtosecond-LASIK. Only 3/6 cases had a positive culture. All the cases in our series had a favorable outcome.","PeriodicalId":17981,"journal":{"name":"Laser therapy","volume":"39 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laser therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/ltj.2024.389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluates the incidence and outcome of infectious keratitis after laser vision correction by photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), femtosecond LASIK, and keratorefractive lenticule extraction (KLEx) in a retrospective, consecutive, single-institute series. Patients with presumed infectious keratitis between 2011 and 2023 were analyzed. In PRK, manual deepithelialization was done, and mitomycin C was used with spherical equivalents greater than 3 diopters. Femtosecond LASIK and KLEx were performed with an LDV Ziemer laser; the interface was rinsed in both techniques. All treatments received post-operative netilmicin eyedrops. Finally, 106269 eyes of 54278 patients were included; 6 eyes of 6 patients were identified as having infectious keratitis (3 by staphylococci, 3 culture-negative). The overall incidence of infectious keratitis was 0.0056% (0.0164% after PRK, 0.0023% after femtosecond LASIK, 0.1366% after KLEx; Chi2 p<0.00001). The odds ratio for PRK compared to LASIK was 7.2 (p=0.0307); for KLEx compared to LASIK 59.7 (p=0.0008). Presentation after KLEx (2 days) was earlier than after PRK (5, 4, and 5 days) and LASIK (6 and 4 days). In all cases, hourly fortified cefazolin and tobramycin eyedrops were used, with a good response: 3 eyes maintained a 20/20 uncorrected visual acuity; 2 eyes 20/20 with myopic astigmatism; 1 eye ended 20/25 with correction because of irregular astigmatism. In conclusion, infectious keratitis was a rare complication, more common after KLEx and less common after femtosecond-LASIK. Only 3/6 cases had a positive culture. All the cases in our series had a favorable outcome.
10 万眼病例系列中的光屈光性角膜切除术、飞秒激光角膜磨镶术和皮瓣摘除术后感染性角膜炎
本研究通过一项回顾性、连续性、单机构系列研究,评估了通过光屈光性角膜切除术(PRK)、飞秒激光角膜屈光手术(FASIK)和角膜屈光小体摘除术(KLEx)进行激光视力矫正后感染性角膜炎的发病率和结果。研究分析了 2011 年至 2023 年间推测患有感染性角膜炎的患者。在PRK手术中,进行了人工深层角膜剥离,并在球面等值大于3斜度时使用了丝裂霉素C。飞秒 LASIK 和 KLEx 采用 LDV Ziemer 激光器进行;两种技术都对界面进行了冲洗。所有治疗均在术后使用奈替米星眼药水。最后,共纳入了 54278 名患者的 106269 只眼睛;其中 6 名患者的 6 只眼睛被确定为感染性角膜炎(3 只为葡萄球菌感染,3 只培养阴性)。感染性角膜炎的总发生率为 0.0056%(PRK 后为 0.0164%,飞秒 LASIK 后为 0.0023%,KLEx 后为 0.1366%;Chi2 p<0.00001)。与 LASIK 相比,PRK 的几率比为 7.2(p=0.0307);与 LASIK 相比,KLEx 的几率比为 59.7(p=0.0008)。KLEx术后(2天)比PRK术后(5天、4天和5天)和LASIK术后(6天和4天)更早出现症状。所有病例都使用了每小时一次的强化头孢唑啉和妥布霉素眼药水,反应良好:3 只眼睛的未矫正视力维持在 20/20;2 只眼睛的未矫正视力为 20/20,但有近视散光;1 只眼睛的未矫正视力为 20/25,因为有不规则散光。总之,感染性角膜炎是一种罕见的并发症,KLEx术后较常见,飞秒激光角膜屈光手术后较少见。只有 3/6 的病例培养结果呈阳性。我们系列中的所有病例都获得了良好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Laser therapy
Laser therapy Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信