Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern of Nosocomial and Community-Acquired Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Isfahan: A Prospective Multicenter Study

Sayed Nassereddin Mostafavi Esfahani, S. Rostami, Zahra Amini
{"title":"Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern of Nosocomial and Community-Acquired Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Isfahan: A Prospective Multicenter Study","authors":"Sayed Nassereddin Mostafavi Esfahani, S. Rostami, Zahra Amini","doi":"10.5812/jkums-140315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a ubiquitous bacillus responsible for severe infections in inpatients, especially nosocomial and intensive care unit (ICU) infections. Objectives: This study aimed to determine the antibiotic susceptibility of clinical isolates from inpatients in three referral hospitals in Isfahan, Iran. Methods: Standard tests identified the organism and antibiotic susceptibility testing. Stratification was performed by place of infection (community, hospital), admission ward (ICU, non-ICU), and age group (< 20 versus > 20 years). Results: P. aeruginosa showed high susceptibility to colistin (100%) and amikacin (81.8%) followed by tobramycin (69.2%), ciprofloxacin (68.5%), meropenem (67.2%), cefepime (65.7%), ceftazidime (64.3%), and imipenem (63.3%). Community-acquired strains were significantly more susceptible to meropenem (81.6%), ciprofloxacin (77.1%), cefepime (77.1%), imipenem (74.3%), and ceftazidime (72.2%) than nosocomial strains. Non-ICU isolates were more susceptible to carbapenems. P. aeruginosa isolates had higher antibiotic susceptibility in less than 20 years. Conclusions: Based on the results, a combination of colistin and amikacin would be appropriate for the empiric treatment of suspected P. aeruginosa infections in severe cases, nosocomial infections, or patients admitted to ICU. Ceftazidime, cefepime, ciprofloxacin, meropenem, or imipenem would be suitable for mild to moderate infections, especially in community-acquired infections.","PeriodicalId":507382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences","volume":"31 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/jkums-140315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a ubiquitous bacillus responsible for severe infections in inpatients, especially nosocomial and intensive care unit (ICU) infections. Objectives: This study aimed to determine the antibiotic susceptibility of clinical isolates from inpatients in three referral hospitals in Isfahan, Iran. Methods: Standard tests identified the organism and antibiotic susceptibility testing. Stratification was performed by place of infection (community, hospital), admission ward (ICU, non-ICU), and age group (< 20 versus > 20 years). Results: P. aeruginosa showed high susceptibility to colistin (100%) and amikacin (81.8%) followed by tobramycin (69.2%), ciprofloxacin (68.5%), meropenem (67.2%), cefepime (65.7%), ceftazidime (64.3%), and imipenem (63.3%). Community-acquired strains were significantly more susceptible to meropenem (81.6%), ciprofloxacin (77.1%), cefepime (77.1%), imipenem (74.3%), and ceftazidime (72.2%) than nosocomial strains. Non-ICU isolates were more susceptible to carbapenems. P. aeruginosa isolates had higher antibiotic susceptibility in less than 20 years. Conclusions: Based on the results, a combination of colistin and amikacin would be appropriate for the empiric treatment of suspected P. aeruginosa infections in severe cases, nosocomial infections, or patients admitted to ICU. Ceftazidime, cefepime, ciprofloxacin, meropenem, or imipenem would be suitable for mild to moderate infections, especially in community-acquired infections.
伊斯法罕医院和社区获得性铜绿假单胞菌的抗生素敏感性模式:一项前瞻性多中心研究
背景:铜绿假单胞菌(Pseudomonas aeruginosa)是一种无处不在的杆菌,可导致住院病人的严重感染,尤其是院内感染和重症监护室(ICU)感染。研究目的本研究旨在确定伊朗伊斯法罕三家转诊医院住院患者临床分离菌株的抗生素敏感性。方法:通过标准测试确定病原体和抗生素的敏感性:通过标准检测确定病原体并进行抗生素药敏试验。根据感染地点(社区、医院)、入院病房(重症监护室、非重症监护室)和年龄组(小于 20 岁和大于 20 岁)进行分层。结果显示铜绿假单胞菌对可乐定(100%)和阿米卡星(81.8%)的敏感性较高,其次是妥布霉素(69.2%)、环丙沙星(68.5%)、美罗培南(67.2%)、头孢吡肟(65.7%)、头孢他啶(64.3%)和亚胺培南(63.3%)。社区获得菌株对美罗培南(81.6%)、环丙沙星(77.1%)、头孢吡肟(77.1%)、亚胺培南(74.3%)和头孢他啶(72.2%)的敏感性明显高于非社区菌株。非重症监护室分离菌株对碳青霉烯类更敏感。20年以下的铜绿假单胞菌分离株对抗生素的敏感性更高。结论:根据研究结果,对于重症病例、院内感染或入住重症监护室的疑似铜绿假单胞菌感染患者,经验性治疗宜联合使用可乐定和阿米卡星。头孢他啶、头孢吡肟、环丙沙星、美罗培南或亚胺培南适用于轻度至中度感染,尤其是社区获得性感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信