Economic Development, Industrialization, and Poverty Eradication: A Benchmarking Analysis of Developing, Emerging, and Developed Countries

Afonso Delgado, Paulo Caldas, Miguel Varela
{"title":"Economic Development, Industrialization, and Poverty Eradication: A Benchmarking Analysis of Developing, Emerging, and Developed Countries","authors":"Afonso Delgado, Paulo Caldas, Miguel Varela","doi":"10.54175/hsustain3010007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study utilizes benchmarking techniques to monitor productivity change in relation to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 1, 8, and 9, addressing the challenges faced by countries in interpreting measures. The first SDG 1, “No Poverty”, aims to completely eliminate poverty. The objective of SDG 8, “Decent Work and Economic Growth”, is to foster comprehensive economic advancement. Finally, SDG 9, “Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure”, focuses on the creation of durable and sustainable infrastructure, as well as promoting innovation to drive economic progress. Economic development, job creation, wealth creation, and poverty eradication are crucial for sustainable development. However, there is no other study estimating the evolution of countries’ performance in terms of these SDGs, whether countries have converged or not, and how each of these SDGs contributes to this performance development. This is the main goal of the present study, which compares 85 countries (2010–2020) from different profiles (developing, emerging, and developed) in terms of several SDG indicators. We applied data envelopment analysis (DEA) and Malmquist productivity indices that quantify changes in efficiency and technology over time to assess productivity dynamics and improvements. Results showed that emerging countries showed the highest productivity development, followed by developing countries and finally developed countries. The slower productivity development in developed countries indicates stagnation, allowing emerging countries to converge in terms of wealth creation, distribution, and poverty reduction.","PeriodicalId":259912,"journal":{"name":"Highlights of Sustainability","volume":"1 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Highlights of Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54175/hsustain3010007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study utilizes benchmarking techniques to monitor productivity change in relation to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 1, 8, and 9, addressing the challenges faced by countries in interpreting measures. The first SDG 1, “No Poverty”, aims to completely eliminate poverty. The objective of SDG 8, “Decent Work and Economic Growth”, is to foster comprehensive economic advancement. Finally, SDG 9, “Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure”, focuses on the creation of durable and sustainable infrastructure, as well as promoting innovation to drive economic progress. Economic development, job creation, wealth creation, and poverty eradication are crucial for sustainable development. However, there is no other study estimating the evolution of countries’ performance in terms of these SDGs, whether countries have converged or not, and how each of these SDGs contributes to this performance development. This is the main goal of the present study, which compares 85 countries (2010–2020) from different profiles (developing, emerging, and developed) in terms of several SDG indicators. We applied data envelopment analysis (DEA) and Malmquist productivity indices that quantify changes in efficiency and technology over time to assess productivity dynamics and improvements. Results showed that emerging countries showed the highest productivity development, followed by developing countries and finally developed countries. The slower productivity development in developed countries indicates stagnation, allowing emerging countries to converge in terms of wealth creation, distribution, and poverty reduction.
经济发展、工业化和消除贫困:发展中国家、新兴国家和发达国家的基准分析
本研究利用基准技术监测与可持续发展目标(SDGs)1、8 和 9 相关的生产力变化,解决各国在解释措施时面临的挑战。第一个可持续发展目标 1 "没有贫困 "旨在彻底消除贫困。可持续发展目标 8 "体面工作和经济增长 "的目标是促进经济全面进步。最后,可持续发展目标 9 "工业、创新和基础设施 "侧重于创建持久和可持续的基础设施,以及促进创新以推动经济进步。经济发展、创造就业、创造财富和消除贫困对于可持续发展至关重要。然而,目前还没有其他研究对各国在这些可持续发展目标方面的绩效演变情况、各国是否趋同以及每项可持续发展目标对绩效发展的贡献进行估算。这是本研究的主要目标,它比较了 85 个不同国家(发展中国家、新兴国家和发达国家)在几项可持续发展目标指标方面的表现(2010-2020 年)。我们采用了数据包络分析法(DEA)和 Malmquist 生产率指数(量化效率和技术随时间的变化)来评估生产率的动态变化和提高情况。结果显示,新兴国家的生产力发展水平最高,其次是发展中国家,最后是发达国家。发达国家的生产力发展较慢,表明其停滞不前,使得新兴国家在财富创造、分配和减贫方面趋于一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信