“you just look at rocks, and have beards” Perceptions of Geology From the United Kingdom: A Qualitative Analysis From an Online Survey

S. Rogers, Sam Giles, Natasha Dowey, Sarah E. Greene, Rehemat Bhatia, K. V. van Landeghem, Chris King
{"title":"“you just look at rocks, and have beards” Perceptions of Geology From the United Kingdom: A Qualitative Analysis From an Online Survey","authors":"S. Rogers, Sam Giles, Natasha Dowey, Sarah E. Greene, Rehemat Bhatia, K. V. van Landeghem, Chris King","doi":"10.3389/esss.2024.10078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last few decades, Geology courses, particularly in the Global North, have seen a decline in student enrolment. Geologists have linked this downturn to a lack of exposure to the subject at school and college level. This work seeks to understand the public’s relationship with Geology and draws on over 5,000 open-ended question responses to a survey disseminated in 2021. The survey asked both those who had, and had not, studied geology as a subject a series of questions in order to explore their perceptions of the discipline. Our findings indicate that individuals “outside” of geology see the subject as old fashioned, boring, and environmentally damaging; simply the study of rock samples with nothing new to be discovered from; and with poor job prospects outside of the oil and gas industry. Geologists who responded to the survey paint a picture of a broad, interdisciplinary subject, with vibrant employability opportunities—yet struggle to coherently and collectively describe this when asked, “what is geology?”. In addition to the identified perception of geology as boring, and notions of poor employability being a barrier to prospective students, diversity and inclusivity issues are highlighted as significant barriers by those who study geology. Our findings indicate that both geologists and the geology curriculum need to coherently describe what geology is more effectively. We need to develop and better communicate the subject’s interdisciplinary nature and links to critical societal issues, such as the role of responsible mineral extraction in the energy transition and the importance of geology in vital areas such as climate change science, water resource management, environmental conservation, and sustainable urban/built development. Finding new ways to show that, far from being boring, geology is a subject that can fundamentally change the way you see and interact with the world around you is of central importance to achieving this. Efforts to make the subject more equitable are also highlighted as being critical in creating a more inclusive and accessible discipline.","PeriodicalId":148192,"journal":{"name":"Earth Science, Systems and Society","volume":"60 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth Science, Systems and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/esss.2024.10078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the last few decades, Geology courses, particularly in the Global North, have seen a decline in student enrolment. Geologists have linked this downturn to a lack of exposure to the subject at school and college level. This work seeks to understand the public’s relationship with Geology and draws on over 5,000 open-ended question responses to a survey disseminated in 2021. The survey asked both those who had, and had not, studied geology as a subject a series of questions in order to explore their perceptions of the discipline. Our findings indicate that individuals “outside” of geology see the subject as old fashioned, boring, and environmentally damaging; simply the study of rock samples with nothing new to be discovered from; and with poor job prospects outside of the oil and gas industry. Geologists who responded to the survey paint a picture of a broad, interdisciplinary subject, with vibrant employability opportunities—yet struggle to coherently and collectively describe this when asked, “what is geology?”. In addition to the identified perception of geology as boring, and notions of poor employability being a barrier to prospective students, diversity and inclusivity issues are highlighted as significant barriers by those who study geology. Our findings indicate that both geologists and the geology curriculum need to coherently describe what geology is more effectively. We need to develop and better communicate the subject’s interdisciplinary nature and links to critical societal issues, such as the role of responsible mineral extraction in the energy transition and the importance of geology in vital areas such as climate change science, water resource management, environmental conservation, and sustainable urban/built development. Finding new ways to show that, far from being boring, geology is a subject that can fundamentally change the way you see and interact with the world around you is of central importance to achieving this. Efforts to make the subject more equitable are also highlighted as being critical in creating a more inclusive and accessible discipline.
"你们只是看着石头,留着胡子"--英国人对地质学的看法:在线调查的定性分析
在过去的几十年里,地质学课程的学生注册人数有所下降,尤其是在全球北方地区。地质学家认为,这种下滑与学校和大学缺乏对地质学的了解有关。本作品旨在了解公众与地质学的关系,并参考了 5000 多份对 2021 年发布的调查问卷的开放式问题回复。调查向学习过或未学习过地质学的人提出了一系列问题,以探讨他们对该学科的看法。我们的调查结果表明,"地质学之外 "的人认为地质学是一门过时、枯燥和破坏环境的学科;仅仅是研究岩石样本,没有新的发现;在石油和天然气行业之外的工作前景不佳。对调查做出回应的地质学家们描绘了一个广泛的、跨学科的学科,以及充满活力的就业机会--然而,当被问及 "什么是地质学 "时,他们却很难连贯一致地描述这一点。除了认为地质学枯燥乏味、就业能力差是阻碍未来学生学习地质学的一个因素之外,多样性和包容性问题也是学习地质学的学生所面临的主要障碍。我们的研究结果表明,地质学家和地质学课程都需要更有效地连贯描述地质学是什么。我们需要发展并更好地宣传该学科的跨学科性质以及与关键社会问题的联系,例如负责任的矿物开采在能源转型中的作用,以及地质学在气候变化科学、水资源管理、环境保护和可持续城市/建筑发展等重要领域的重要性。要实现这一目标,最重要的是要找到新的方法来表明,地质学绝非枯燥乏味,而是一门可以从根本上改变你看待周围世界的方式以及与周围世界互动的学科。努力使这门学科更加公平也是创建一门更具包容性和更容易获得的学科的关键所在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信