Fast and Slow Technological Transitions

Rodrigo Adão, Martin Beraja, Nitya Pandalai-Nayar
{"title":"Fast and Slow Technological Transitions","authors":"Rodrigo Adão, Martin Beraja, Nitya Pandalai-Nayar","doi":"10.1086/730223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Do economies adjust slowly to certain technological innovations and more rapidly to others? We argue that the adjustment is slower when innovations mainly affect production activities that intensively use more specific skills. The reason is that the adjustment is driven more by the slow entry of younger generations of workers who invest in the skills that became more valuable and less by the relatively fast reallocation of older workers whose skills must be transferred across activities. We build an overlapping generations model of technological transitions that exhibits these features, motivated by new evidence documenting differences in how the U.S. labor market adjusted to two major technological innovations: Electricity in the early 20th century, and late 20th century advances in Information & Communications technologies (ICT). Our theoretical analysis yields a novel q -theory representation of equilibrium dynamics linking skill differences across generations to lifetime wage differentials ( q ). This allows us to sharply characterize when technological transitions are faster and, in particular, explain why the adjustment to ICT, but not Electricity, relied entirely on the slow entry of younger generations.","PeriodicalId":272883,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Political Economy Macroeconomics","volume":"74 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Political Economy Macroeconomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/730223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Do economies adjust slowly to certain technological innovations and more rapidly to others? We argue that the adjustment is slower when innovations mainly affect production activities that intensively use more specific skills. The reason is that the adjustment is driven more by the slow entry of younger generations of workers who invest in the skills that became more valuable and less by the relatively fast reallocation of older workers whose skills must be transferred across activities. We build an overlapping generations model of technological transitions that exhibits these features, motivated by new evidence documenting differences in how the U.S. labor market adjusted to two major technological innovations: Electricity in the early 20th century, and late 20th century advances in Information & Communications technologies (ICT). Our theoretical analysis yields a novel q -theory representation of equilibrium dynamics linking skill differences across generations to lifetime wage differentials ( q ). This allows us to sharply characterize when technological transitions are faster and, in particular, explain why the adjustment to ICT, but not Electricity, relied entirely on the slow entry of younger generations.
技术转型的快慢
经济体是否对某些技术创新的调整速度较慢,而对其他技术创新的调整速度较快?我们认为,当创新主要影响密集使用更多特定技能的生产活动时,调整速度会更慢。其原因在于,年轻一代工人的缓慢进入(他们投资于变得更有价值的技能)和年长工人的相对快速重新分配(他们的技能必须在不同活动之间转移)对调整的推动更大。我们建立了一个技术转型的世代交替模型,该模型展现了这些特征,其动机是有新的证据证明了美国劳动力市场如何适应两大技术创新的差异:20世纪初的电力和20世纪末的信息与通信技术(ICT)的进步。我们的理论分析得出了一种新颖的 q 理论均衡动态表述,将各代人的技能差异与终生工资差异(q)联系起来。这使我们能够清晰地描述何时技术转型更快,尤其是解释了为什么对信息和通信技术的调整(而非电力技术)完全依赖于年轻一代的缓慢进入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信