Student’s Reversible Thinking Processes: An Analysis Based on Adversity Quotient Type Climbers

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Fadrik Adi Fahrudin, C. Sa’dijah, E. Hidayanto, Hery Susanto
{"title":"Student’s Reversible Thinking Processes: An Analysis Based on Adversity Quotient Type Climbers","authors":"Fadrik Adi Fahrudin, C. Sa’dijah, E. Hidayanto, Hery Susanto","doi":"10.17583/qre.11964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reversibility thinking carried out mentally in mathematical operations has an important role in the process of understanding concepts as it involves developing a thinking process from beginning to end and from end to beginning. This qualitative research aims to describe students' reversible thinking processes in solving algebra problems, specifically in climber-type adversity quotient. A total of 2 students who have the climber type were selected as participants from 36 potential subjects involved in the research. Data collection was carried out by providing Adversity Response Profile questionnaires, Test of Thinking Reversible, and semi-structured interviews. Our participants solved problems according to polya stages and through forward and reverse processes. The results of data analysis show that in the forward process, there are 2 aspects of reversible thinking, namely negation and reciprocity, while in the reverse process, they involve 2 aspects of reversible thinking, namely the capability to return to initial data after obtaining the result and negation. The results suggest that student's ability to perform mental reversals indicates a strong reversible thought process, leading to more precise cognitive thinking.","PeriodicalId":42606,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Research in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17583/qre.11964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reversibility thinking carried out mentally in mathematical operations has an important role in the process of understanding concepts as it involves developing a thinking process from beginning to end and from end to beginning. This qualitative research aims to describe students' reversible thinking processes in solving algebra problems, specifically in climber-type adversity quotient. A total of 2 students who have the climber type were selected as participants from 36 potential subjects involved in the research. Data collection was carried out by providing Adversity Response Profile questionnaires, Test of Thinking Reversible, and semi-structured interviews. Our participants solved problems according to polya stages and through forward and reverse processes. The results of data analysis show that in the forward process, there are 2 aspects of reversible thinking, namely negation and reciprocity, while in the reverse process, they involve 2 aspects of reversible thinking, namely the capability to return to initial data after obtaining the result and negation. The results suggest that student's ability to perform mental reversals indicates a strong reversible thought process, leading to more precise cognitive thinking.
学生的可逆思维过程:基于逆境商数型攀登者的分析
在数学运算中以心理方式进行的可逆性思维在理解概念的过程中具有重要作用,因为它涉及到从头到尾和从尾到头的思维发展过程。本定性研究旨在描述学生在解决代数问题时的可逆性思维过程,特别是在攀登型逆境商中的可逆性思维过程。本研究从 36 名潜在研究对象中挑选了 2 名攀登者型学生作为参与者。数据收集通过提供逆境反应档案问卷、逆向思维测试和半结构式访谈进行。我们的参与者按照 polya 阶段,通过正向和逆向过程解决问题。数据分析结果表明,在正向过程中,涉及到可逆性思维的两个方面,即否定和对等,而在逆向过程中,涉及到可逆性思维的两个方面,即得到结果后返回初始数据的能力和否定。结果表明,学生的思维逆向能力表明其思维过程具有较强的可逆性,从而使认知思维更加精确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Qualitative Research in Education
Qualitative Research in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
4
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信