ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION: CASES OF USING CHATGPT 3.5

Dmytro Pokryshen
{"title":"ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION: CASES OF USING CHATGPT 3.5","authors":"Dmytro Pokryshen","doi":"10.31110/fmo2024.v39i1-08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Formulation of the problem. This research explores the possibilities and peculiarities of employing artificial intelligence in general secondary education. A retrospective analysis of human utilization of artificial intelligence is conducted. Emphasis is placed on the relevance and significance of aligning the education system with contemporary demands and implementing new technological solutions. The focus is on the correctness of queries to systems and the necessity of analyzing work outcomes.\nMaterials and methods. Data collection and processing were conducted during professional development courses for education professionals in the Chernihiv region (Ukraine) through pedagogical observation of course participants and their work with AI. Throughout the study, 34 training sessions were conducted, involving 748 teachers teaching various subjects. Among the showcased cases of AI usage, the most demanded queries among teachers are presented.\nResults. Examples of text analysis using the generative system ChatGPT 3.5 are provided. The obtained results are analyzed. The findings emphasized the necessity of clearly formulating queries and providing comprehensive input data and complete texts for analysis. In such cases, the artificial intelligence system can provide more accurate responses. This study demonstrated that the system handles this task quite successfully when providing the text of a program code and requesting commentary. However, solving mathematical problems poses specific difficulties, and obtaining the correct answer is only sometimes achievable. That reiterates the critical approach toward the system's obtained work outcomes.\nConclusions. ChatGPT 3.5 can correctly analyze well-known facts and provide accurate information about them, but if the facts are local, the system cannot cope with the task. Simple math problems and tasks are performed correctly, but more complex ones already cause difficulties. It is essential not only to write prompts correctly but also to present input data. Such tasks as paraphrasing, translation, and changing the text's tone demonstrate modern AI systems' capabilities. ChatGPT 3.5 can become a good teacher's assistant or assistant for preparing various documentation. Requests for help in writing lesson plans, preparation of educational activities, formation of project topics, and technological maps of projects are carried out by the system at a high level.","PeriodicalId":244674,"journal":{"name":"Physical and Mathematical Education","volume":"98 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical and Mathematical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31110/fmo2024.v39i1-08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Formulation of the problem. This research explores the possibilities and peculiarities of employing artificial intelligence in general secondary education. A retrospective analysis of human utilization of artificial intelligence is conducted. Emphasis is placed on the relevance and significance of aligning the education system with contemporary demands and implementing new technological solutions. The focus is on the correctness of queries to systems and the necessity of analyzing work outcomes. Materials and methods. Data collection and processing were conducted during professional development courses for education professionals in the Chernihiv region (Ukraine) through pedagogical observation of course participants and their work with AI. Throughout the study, 34 training sessions were conducted, involving 748 teachers teaching various subjects. Among the showcased cases of AI usage, the most demanded queries among teachers are presented. Results. Examples of text analysis using the generative system ChatGPT 3.5 are provided. The obtained results are analyzed. The findings emphasized the necessity of clearly formulating queries and providing comprehensive input data and complete texts for analysis. In such cases, the artificial intelligence system can provide more accurate responses. This study demonstrated that the system handles this task quite successfully when providing the text of a program code and requesting commentary. However, solving mathematical problems poses specific difficulties, and obtaining the correct answer is only sometimes achievable. That reiterates the critical approach toward the system's obtained work outcomes. Conclusions. ChatGPT 3.5 can correctly analyze well-known facts and provide accurate information about them, but if the facts are local, the system cannot cope with the task. Simple math problems and tasks are performed correctly, but more complex ones already cause difficulties. It is essential not only to write prompts correctly but also to present input data. Such tasks as paraphrasing, translation, and changing the text's tone demonstrate modern AI systems' capabilities. ChatGPT 3.5 can become a good teacher's assistant or assistant for preparing various documentation. Requests for help in writing lesson plans, preparation of educational activities, formation of project topics, and technological maps of projects are carried out by the system at a high level.
教育领域的人工智能:使用 chatgpt 3.5 的案例
问题的提出。本研究探讨了在普通中等教育中应用人工智能的可能性和特殊性。对人类利用人工智能的情况进行了回顾性分析。重点放在使教育系统符合当代需求和实施新技术解决方案的相关性和意义上。重点是系统查询的正确性和分析工作成果的必要性。数据收集和处理是在切尔尼戈夫州(乌克兰)教育专业人员职业发展课程期间,通过对课程参与者及其使用人工智能工作的教学观察进行的。在整个研究过程中,共举办了 34 次培训课程,有 748 名教师参与了不同科目的教学。在展示的人工智能使用案例中,介绍了教师需求量最大的查询。提供了使用生成系统 ChatGPT 3.5 进行文本分析的示例。对获得的结果进行了分析。研究结果表明,必须清楚地提出查询,并提供全面的输入数据和完整的文本以供分析。在这种情况下,人工智能系统可以提供更准确的回复。这项研究表明,在提供程序代码文本和要求评论时,系统能相当成功地处理这项任务。不过,解决数学问题会遇到一些特殊困难,只有在某些情况下才能获得正确答案。这重申了对系统所取得的工作成果的批判性态度。ChatGPT 3.5 可以正确分析众所周知的事实并提供准确的相关信息,但如果事实是局部的,系统就无法完成任务。简单的数学问题和任务都能正确完成,但更复杂的问题和任务就会造成困难。不仅要正确书写提示语,还要正确呈现输入数据。诸如转述、翻译和改变文本语气等任务都展示了现代人工智能系统的能力。ChatGPT 3.5 可以成为教师的得力助手或编写各种文档的助手。在撰写教案、准备教学活动、制定项目主题和项目技术图等方面的帮助请求,系统都能高水平地完成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信