Direct Recycling Technology for Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries: Limitations of Current Implementation

IF 4.6 4区 化学 Q2 ELECTROCHEMISTRY
A. Pražanová, Zbyněk Plachý, Jan Kočí, Michael Fridrich, V. Knap
{"title":"Direct Recycling Technology for Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries: Limitations of Current Implementation","authors":"A. Pražanová, Zbyněk Plachý, Jan Kočí, Michael Fridrich, V. Knap","doi":"10.3390/batteries10030081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The significant deployment of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) within a wide application field covering small consumer electronics, light and heavy means of transport, such as e-bikes, e-scooters, and electric vehicles (EVs), or energy storage stationary systems will inevitably lead to generating notable amounts of spent batteries in the coming years. Considering the environmental perspective, material resource sustainability, and terms of the circular economy, recycling represents a highly prospective strategy for LIB end-of-life (EOL) management. In contrast with traditional, large-scale, implemented recycling methods, such as pyrometallurgy or hydrometallurgy, direct recycling technology constitutes a promising solution for LIB EOL treatment with outstanding environmental benefits, including reduction of energy consumption and emission footprint, and weighty economic viability. This work comprehensively assesses the limitations and challenges of state-of-the-art, implemented direct recycling methods for spent LIB cathode and anode material treatment. The introduced approaches include solid-state sintering, electrochemical relithiation in organic and aqueous electrolytes, and ionothermal, solution, and eutectic relithiation methods. Since most direct recycling techniques are still being developed and implemented primarily on a laboratory scale, this review identifies and discusses potential areas for optimization to facilitate forthcoming large-scale industrial implementation.","PeriodicalId":8755,"journal":{"name":"Batteries","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Batteries","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries10030081","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ELECTROCHEMISTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The significant deployment of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) within a wide application field covering small consumer electronics, light and heavy means of transport, such as e-bikes, e-scooters, and electric vehicles (EVs), or energy storage stationary systems will inevitably lead to generating notable amounts of spent batteries in the coming years. Considering the environmental perspective, material resource sustainability, and terms of the circular economy, recycling represents a highly prospective strategy for LIB end-of-life (EOL) management. In contrast with traditional, large-scale, implemented recycling methods, such as pyrometallurgy or hydrometallurgy, direct recycling technology constitutes a promising solution for LIB EOL treatment with outstanding environmental benefits, including reduction of energy consumption and emission footprint, and weighty economic viability. This work comprehensively assesses the limitations and challenges of state-of-the-art, implemented direct recycling methods for spent LIB cathode and anode material treatment. The introduced approaches include solid-state sintering, electrochemical relithiation in organic and aqueous electrolytes, and ionothermal, solution, and eutectic relithiation methods. Since most direct recycling techniques are still being developed and implemented primarily on a laboratory scale, this review identifies and discusses potential areas for optimization to facilitate forthcoming large-scale industrial implementation.
废旧锂离子电池的直接回收技术:当前实施的局限性
锂离子电池(LIB)的应用领域十分广泛,包括小型消费电子产品、轻型和重型交通工具(如电动自行车、电动摩托车和电动汽车)或固定式储能系统等,在未来几年内,锂离子电池不可避免地会产生大量废电池。从环境角度、材料资源可持续性和循环经济的角度考虑,回收利用是一种极具前景的 LIB 报废(EOL)管理策略。与火法冶金或湿法冶金等传统的大规模回收方法相比,直接回收技术是一种前景广阔的 LIB 报废处理解决方案,具有突出的环境效益(包括减少能源消耗和排放足迹)和重要的经济可行性。这项工作全面评估了最先进的直接回收方法在处理锂电子电池阴极和阳极废料方面的局限性和挑战。所介绍的方法包括固态烧结、有机和水性电解质中的电化学再结晶以及离子热、溶液和共晶再结晶方法。由于大多数直接再循环技术仍主要在实验室规模上开发和实施,本综述确定并讨论了潜在的优化领域,以促进即将到来的大规模工业实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Batteries
Batteries Energy-Energy Engineering and Power Technology
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
15.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信